Eliciting student participation in video-mediated EFL classroom interactions: focus on teacher response-pursuit practices

References

• Abe, M. (2021). L2 interactional competence in asynchronous multiparty text-based communication: Study of online collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614070
   Google Scholar
• Akayoglu, S., Üzüm, B., & Yazan, B. (2022). Supporting teachers’ engagement in pedagogies of social justice (STEPS): Collaborative project between five universities in Turkey and the USA. Focus on ELT Journal, 4(1), 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrup, M. (2019). ‘Well let me put it uhm the other way around maybe’: Managing students’ trouble displays in the CLIL classroom. Classroom Discourse, 10(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1567360
   Google Scholar
• Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
   Google Scholar
• Badem-Korkmaz, F., & Balaman, U. (2020). Third position repair for resolving troubles in understanding teacher instructions. Linguistics and Education, 60, 100859.
   Google Scholar
• Badem-Korkmaz, F., Ekin, S., & Balaman, U. (2022). Pre-service language teachers’ resistance to teacher trainer advice on task design for video-mediated L2 interaction.Classroom Discourse, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. (2021). The interactional organization of video‐mediated collaborative writing: Focus on repair practices. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3034
   Google Scholar
• Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017). The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. (2018). Task-induced development of hinting behaviors in online task-oriented L2 interaction. Language Learning&Technology, 22(2), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G., Mandelbaum, J., & Wilkinson, S. (2012). Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.673380
   Google Scholar
• Canto, S., & Jauregi-Ondarra, K. (2021). Interaction games to boost students’ engagement in foreign language virtual exchanges: The case of virtual worlds and video-communication. In N. Zoghlami, C. Brudermann, C. Sarré, M. Grosbois, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL and professionalisation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 41–45). Research-publishing.net.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
   Google Scholar
• Chazal, K. (2015). Pedagogical artifacts in teacher-initiated response pursuits: A conversation analytic study of interaction in the French foreign language classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Çimenli, B., Sert, O., & Jenks, C. (2022). Topic maintenance in video-mediated virtual exchanges: Rolling the ball back in L2 interactions. System, 108, 102834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102834
   Google Scholar
• Duran, D., & Jacknick, C. M. (2020). Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions. Linguistics and Education, 56, 100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808
   Google Scholar
• Ekin, S., Balaman, U., & Badem-Korkmaz, F. (2021). Tracking telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review.
   Google Scholar
• Etehadieh, E., & Rendle-Short, J. (2016). Intersubjectivity or preference: Interpreting student pauses in supervisory meetings. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121529
   Google Scholar
• Foung, D., Chen, J., & Lin, L. (2022). When ‘blended’ becomes ‘online’: A data-driven study on the change of self-directed engagement during COVID-19. CALICO Journal, 39(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.19666
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2020). ‘Soy estudiante de ingles:)’ – A telecollaborative approach to intercultural and ethnographic engagement in a Hong Kong university course. JALT CALL Journal, 16(1), 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2004). On delaying the answer: Question sequences extended after the question. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 246–266).Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (2014). Making meaning online: Computer-mediated communication for language learning. In A. Peti-Stantić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Language as information. Proceedings from the CALS conference 2012. (pp. 89–106).Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500335455
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In. G. Button (Ed.), Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hochuli, K. (forthcoming). Non talking heads: How architectures of digital co-presence shape question-silence-answer sequences in university teaching. In D. vom Lehn, W. Gibson & N. Ruiz-Junco (Eds.) People, technology, and social organization: Interactionist studies of everyday life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y. (2014). Missing response after teacher question in primary school English as a foreign language classes. Linguistics and Education, 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D. (2013). Two preferences in question – Answer sequences in language classroom context. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.783497
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and beyond New Series, 125, 13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, C. J. (2014). Social interaction in second language chat rooms. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jocuns, A., Shi, L., Zhang, L., Yin, T., Gu, X., Huang, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Translocating classroom discourse practices during the Covid-19 pandemic in China: A reflective nexus analysis account. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2012). Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.716624
   Google Scholar
• Kardaş İşler, N., Balaman, U., & Şahin, A. E. (2019). The interactional management of learner initiatives in social studies classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100341
   Google Scholar
• Komter, M. L. (2006). From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
   Google Scholar
• Lam Hoang, T. G., & Filipi, A. (2019). In pursuit of understanding and response: A micro-analysis of language alternation practices in an EFL university context in Vietnam. The Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1221439
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is learning: A personal account of learning to teach online. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.581-600
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and skype video calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
   Google Scholar
• Malabarba, T., Mendes, A. C. O., & de Souza, J. (2022). Multimodal resolution of overlapping talk in video-mediated L2 instruction. Languages, 7(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020154
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001455X
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2014). Managing synchronous polyfocality in new media/new learning. Online Language Educators’ Instructional Strategies. System, 42, 177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Google Scholar
• Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2021). E-classroom interactional competencies: Mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
   Google Scholar
• Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting next speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next speaker in planned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959463
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (Eds.). (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oittinen, T. (2018). Multimodal accomplishment of alignment and affiliation in the local space of distant meetings. Culture and Organization, 24(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189
   Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A., & Gimeno-Sanz, A. (2020). Exploring L2 Learners’ engagement and attitude in an intercultural encounter. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 187–208. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44716
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & Park, S. (2022). Eliciting student participation in synchronous online L2 lessons: The use of oral and written DIUs. Linguistics and Education, 71, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101085
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152–163). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Google Scholar
• Reddington, E. (2018). Managing participation in the adult ESL classroom: Engagement and exit practices. Classroom Discourse, 9(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1433051
   Google Scholar
• Ro, E. (2022). Going beyond practicing English: Language alternation in an L2 book club’s Zoom meetings. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221114731
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, J. F. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M. (2013). Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL, 25(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000286
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M. (2015). Sustaining multimodal language learner interactions online. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 480–507. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26508
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M. (2016). Meaning-making in online language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing. ReCALL, 28(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000100
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M., & Wigham, C. R. (2017). Multimodal instruction-giving practices in webconferencing-supported language teaching. System, 70, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Satar, M., & Wigham, C. R. (2020). Delivering task instructions in multimodal synchronous online language teaching. Alsic. Apprentissage Des Langues et Systèmes D’Information et de Communication, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/alsic.4571
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745
   Google Scholar
• Schönfeldt, J., & Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O., & Balaman, U. (2018). Orientations to negotiated language and task rules in online L2 interaction. ReCALL, 30(3), 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis, a practical guide (2nd ed.) SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tudini, V. (2012). Conversation analysis of computer‐mediated interactions. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 265–275). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000814
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation‐Response‐Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, A. (2016). Engaging in an interactional routine in EFL classroom: The development of L2 interactional competence over time. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(1), 48–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wigham, C. R., & Satar, M. (2021). Multimodal (inter) action analysis of task instructions in language teaching via videoconferencing: A case study. ReCALL, 33(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000070
   Google Scholar