646
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effects of mobile-assisted reading on incidental L2 word learning: a processing perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, W. K., & Al-Marzouqi, A. H. (2015). Using blended learning for self-learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2015.072025
  • Ballenghein, U., Kaakinen, J. K., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2020). Cognitive engagement during reading on digital tablet: Evidence from concurrent recordings of postural and eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1820–1829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820931830
  • Ballenghein, U., Megalakaki, O., & Baccino, T. (2019). Cognitive engagement in emotional text reading: Concurrent recordings of eye movements and head motion. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1448–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1574718
  • Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163.
  • Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T.-W., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? Journal of Computers in Education, 1, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0012-z
  • Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020). The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1769–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5
  • Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq031
  • Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
  • Day, R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991). Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(2), 541–551.
  • Delgado, P., & Salmerón, L. (2022). Cognitive effort in text processing and reading comprehension in print and on tablet: An eye-tracking study. Discourse Processes, 59(4), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2030157
  • Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
  • Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012). The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811431377
  • Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., & Van Assche, E. (2018). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000109
  • Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307071600
  • Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock “n” roll. Sage.
  • Fisher, T., Sharples, M., Pemberton, R., Ogata, H., Uosaki, N., Edmonds, P., Hull, A., & Tschorn, P. (2012). Incidental second language vocabulary learning from reading novels: A comparison of three mobile modes. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2012100104
  • Godfroid, A. (2020). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Routledge.
  • Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., Lee, S., Sarkar, A., & Yoon, H.-J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000219
  • Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000119
  • Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the Noticing Hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Inside the learner’s mind: Cognitive processing and second language acquisition (pp. 169–197). John Benjamins.
  • Godfroid, A., & Spino, L. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing reactivity of think-alouds and eye tracking: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Language Learning, 65(4), 896–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12136
  • Gutiérrez-Colón, M., Frumuselu, A. D., & Curell, H. (2020). Mobile-assisted Language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: A selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813179
  • Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., & Tavakoli, M. (2016). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL Learners. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.708051
  • Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.355
  • Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207–223.
  • Hu, M., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
  • Huang, H., & Liou, H. (2007). Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 64–82.
  • Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002028
  • Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x
  • Jeong, Y. J., & Gweon, G. (2021). Advantages of print reading over screen reading: A comparison of visual patterns, reading performance, and reading attitudes across paper, computers, and tablets. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(17), 1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1908668
  • Joseph, H. S., Wonnacott, E., Forbes, P., & Nation, K. (2014). Becoming a written word: Eye movements reveal order of acquisition effects following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading. Cognition, 133(1), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.015
  • Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280544000075
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
  • Kabugo, D., Muyinda, P. B., Masagazi, F. M., Mugagga, A. M., & Mulumba, M. B. (2016). Tracking students’ eye-movements when reading learning objects on mobile phones: A discourse analysis of Luganda language teacher-trainees’ reflective observations. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v3i1.129
  • Kantar, M., & Dogan, M. (2015). Development of mobile learning material for 9th grade physics course to use in FATIH project: Force and motion unit. Participatory Educational Research, 2, 5–7.
  • Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Foster, A. (2013). Integrating the visual arts back into the classroom with mobile applications: Teaching beyond the “click and view” approach. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784727
  • Keating, G. D. (2014). Eye-tracking with text. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPattern (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 69–92). Routledge.
  • Kim, D., & Kim, D. J. (2012). Effect of screen size on multimedia vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01145.x
  • Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
  • Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS One. 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revised and updated version]. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley. http://oro.open.ac.uk/57023/
  • Latif, M. M. (2019). Eye-tracking in recent L2 learner process research: A review of areas, issues, and methodological approaches. System, 83, 25–35.
  • Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412019
  • Lee, J. F. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future tense morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102001031
  • Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2019). Native and nonnative processing of active and passive sentences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(04), 853–879. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311800027X
  • Lee, J. F., Malovrh, P. A., Doherty, S., & Nichols, A. (2020). A self-paced reading (SPR) study of the effects of processing instruction on the L2 processing of active and passive sentences. Language Teaching Research, 26(6), 1133–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820914025
  • Leow, R. P., & Cerezo, L. (2016). Deconstructing the I and SLA in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.3
  • Levulis, S. J., Harris, D. J. (2015). Are all tests equal? A comparison of emulator and device testing for mobile usability evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 976–980.
  • Li, Y., & Hafner, C. A. (2022). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Investigating receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. ReCALL, 34(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000161
  • Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014875
  • Lin, C. C. (2017). Learning English with electronic textbooks on tablet PCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1242505
  • Lin, J. J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
  • Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2016). Reading on the move: A study of reading behavior of undergraduate smartphone users in China. Library and Information Science Research, 38(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.007
  • Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2930
  • Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)
  • Miranda, A. M., Nunes-Pereira, E. J., Baskaran, K., & Macedo, A. F. (2018). Eye movements, convergence distance and pupil-size when reading from smartphone, computer, print and tablet. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 11(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5384/sjovs.vol11i1p1-5
  • Mohamed, A. A. (2018). Exposure frequency in L2 reading: An eye-movement perspective of incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000092
  • Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 97–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000224
  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31–55.
  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Scoring Yes-No vocabulary tests: Reaction time vs. nonword approaches. Language Testing, 29(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212438053
  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A., Tragant, E., Conklin, K., Rodgers, M., Serrano, R., & Llanes, Á. (2020). Young learners’ processing of multimodal input and its impact on reading comprehension: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000091
  • Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 1–28.
  • Rahimi, M., & Miri, S. S. (2014). The impact of mobile dictionary use on language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1469–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.567
  • Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 1339–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000099
  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.779
  • Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555
  • Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002
  • Ronconi, A., Veronesi, V., Mason, L., Manzione, L., Florit, E., Anmarkrud, O., & Bråten, I. (2022). Effects of reading medium on the processing, comprehension, and calibration of adolescent readers. Computers & Education, 185, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104520
  • Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004039
  • Sackstein, S., Spark, L., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Are e-books effective tools for learning? Reading speed and comprehension: iPad vs. paper. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1202
  • Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., & Rayne, S. (2019). Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2477–2502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
  • Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  • Senoo, Y., & Yonemoto, K. (2014). Vocabulary learning through extensive reading: A case study. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 1–12.
  • Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., & Wurtz, P. (2012). Reading on LCD vs e-ink displays: Effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x
  • Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., & Groner, R. (2011). Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2011.05.005
  • Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
  • Song, D., Kim, P., Karimi, A. (2012). Inquiry-based learning environment using mobile devices in math classroom. Proceedings of the Association for Education Communications and Technology, 386–392.
  • Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.
  • Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Stockwell, G. (2022). Mobile assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and challenges. Cambridge University Press.
  • Suwantarathip, O., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted exercises to support students’ vocabulary skill development. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163–171.
  • Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
  • Uchihara, T., Webb, S., & Yanagisawa, A. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69(3), 559–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12343
  • Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050023
  • Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245.
  • Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1204.1
  • Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How do frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559800
  • Yu, J., Zhou, X., Yang, X., & Hu, J. (2022). Mobile-assisted or paper-based? The influence of the reading medium on the reading comprehension of English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2012200
  • Zambarbieri, D., & Carniglia, E. (2012). Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, eReaders and printed books. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00930.x
  • Zou, X. L., & Ou, L. (2020). EFL reading test on mobile versus on paper: A study from metacognitive strategy use to test-media impacts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09320-0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.