Investigating EFL learners’ inferential listening comprehension skills through computerized dynamic assessment

References

• Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania State. Ableeva_PS_Thesis_FINAL. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/5374
   Google Scholar
• Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages (pp. 57–86). Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, A., & Barabadi, E. (2014). Examining Iranian EFL learners’ knowledge of grammar through a computerized dynamic test. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(2), 161–183.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2014). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/328585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. S. K., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barabadi, E. (2010). Designing computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension of Iranian university students and its comparison with static test of L2 reading comprehension [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229100800105
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2003). Assessing listening (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2011). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, S., & Doherty, J. (1992). Testing receptive skills within a comprehension-based approach. In R. J. Courchêne, J. I. Glidden, J. S. John, & C. Therien (Eds.), Comprehension-based second language teaching (pp. 299–318). University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, M. (2014). Reducing the need for guesswork in multiple-choice tests. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.902192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge University Press & Assessment. (2021). Cambridge English: B2 first handbook for teachers. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/b2-first-handbook.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840975.004
   Google Scholar
• Choppin, B. (1988). Correction for guessing. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 384–386). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
   Google Scholar
• Compernolle, R. A. v., & Williams, L. E. (2011). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darhower, M. A. (2014). Synchronous computer-mediated dynamic assessment : A case study of l2 Spanish past narration. CALICO Journal, 31(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.2.221-243
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• DonYei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Bashir, S. (2020). An exploration into EFL learners’ writing skills via mobile-based dynamic assessment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1995–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10348-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2019). Exploring L2 learning potential through computerized dynamic assessment. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Vakili Latif, S. (2015). Dynamic assessment of EFL learners’ listening comprehension via computerized concept mapping. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.2.3613
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., Weisi, H., Monkaresi, H., & Bahramlou, K. (2018). Exploring lexical inferencing as a vocabulary acquisition strategy through computerized dynamic assessment and static assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 790–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1451344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estaji, M., & Saeedian, A. (2020). Developing EFL learners’ reading comprehension through computerized dynamic assessment. Reading Psychology, 41(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1768981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2008). Alternative assessment. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 7, 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00004-0
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B., Forzano, L. B., & Witnauer, J. E. (2020). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J. (2015). Inference-making and linguistic skills in listening comprehension: An observation of French students learning Chinese. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 12(2), 204–219.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214564505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, H., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huhta, A., Luoma, S., Oscarson, M., Sajavaara, K., Takala, S., & Teasdale, A. (2002). DIALANG: A diagnostic language assessment system for learners. In Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Case studies (pp. 130–145). Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, Y. T., & Kuo, H. C. (2021). Diagnosing l2 English learners’ listening difficulties and learning needs through computerized dynamic assessment. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1876738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlström, P., & Lundin, E. (2013). CALL in the zone of proximal development: Novelty effects and teacher guidance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.663760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2-3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.767616
   Google Scholar
• Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Sabbe, E. (2013). Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education – Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. (2017). A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: A socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehri Kamrood, A., Davoudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2019). Diagnosing L2 learners’ development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 868–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1645181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A. (2005). Students’ dynamic assessment via online chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 513–536. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24147936 https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i3.513-536
   Google Scholar
• Pileh Roud, L. F., & Hidri, S. (2021). Toward a sociocultural approach to computerized dynamic assessment of the TOEFL iBT listening comprehension test. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4943–4968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10498-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishghadam, R., Barabadi, E., & Kamrood, A. M. (2011). The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 13–53. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1353-1358
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (CDA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Leontjev, D. (2018). To correct or to cooperate: Mediational processes and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 24(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2014). Computerized dynamic assessment (CDA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robillos, R. J. (2023). Implementing translanguaging with pedagogical approach in an English as a foreign language (EFL) listening classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16233a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ listening skill and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive strategy instruction with pedagogical cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15322a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7(2), 137–170.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N., Gomez‐Laich, M. P., & Arrufat‐Marques, M. J. (2016). Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, T. Y. (2021). The impact of immersive virtual reality on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1272–1293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121994291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, A. (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (1995). Assessment of second/foreign language listening comprehension. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A Guide for the Teaching of Second Language Listening (pp. 31–58). Dominie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research methods: The concise knowledge base. Atomic Dog Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Exploring EFL learners’ developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-face and computer-mediated dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1698616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right’: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.58.4.555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, H., & Elena, C. (2013). The inclusion of bottom up and top down strategies in listening comprehension tasks for second semester students from an English licenciatura programa [Bachelor thesis]. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. 3726044H493. https://repositorio.utp.edu.co/items/176bf5c6-97f4-463c-9189-e038e5472565
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. The Collected Works of ls Vygotsky, 5, 187–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1987). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. H., Sun, Y., & Huang, N. W. (2021). Implementation of web-based dynamic assessment in improving low English achievers’ learning effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 36(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1998129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, C. J., & Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2017). Assessing English reading comprehension by Chinese EFL learners in computerized dynamic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0042-3
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2019). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbainos, D., & Sagia, C. (2022). Dynamic assessment of creativity for diagnostic purposes. European Psychologist, 27(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar