Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: the dialectic between ideology and utopia

References

• AndersonE., 2008. Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting. Men and masculinities, 10 (5), 604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonE., 2009. Inclusive masculinities: the changing nature of masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BeasleyC., 2008a. Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and masculinities, 11 (1), 86–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeasleyC., 2008b. Reply to Messerschmidt and to Howson. Men and masculinities, 11 (1), 114–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownW., 1993. Wounded attachments. Political theory, 21 (3), 390–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ConnellR.W., 1987. Gender & power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• ConnellR.W., 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• ConnellR.W., 2000. The men and the boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• ConnellR.W., 2005. Globalization, imperialism, and masculinities. In: M.S.Kimmel, J.Hearn and R.W.Connell, eds. Handbook of studies on men & masculinities. London: Sage, 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• ConnellR. and MesserschmidtJ., 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19 (6), 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DemetriouD.Z., 2001. Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity: a critique. Theory and society, 30 (3), 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DonaldsonM., 1993. What is hegemonic masculinity?Theory and society, 22 (5), 643–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DreyfusH.L., 1991. Being-in-the-world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• GiddensA., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• GlynosJ. and HowarthD., 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• GlynosJ. and HowarthD., 2008. Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations. Political studies review, 6 (2), 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroszE., 2010. The untimeliness of feminist theory. NORA – Nordic journal of feminist and gender research, 18 (1), 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• HabermasJ., 1984. The theory of communicative action. Vol. I: reason and the rationalization of society. London: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• HalberstamJ., 1998. Female masculinity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HallS., 1997. Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• HaywoodC. and Macan GhaillM., 2003. Men and masculinities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HearnJ., 2004. From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist theory, 5 (1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• HearnJ. et al., 2012. Hegemonic masculinity and beyond: 40 years of research in Sweden. Men and masculinities, 15 (1), 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerzM. and JohanssonT., 2012. Maskuliniteter: kritik, tendenser, trender[Masculinities: critique, tendencies, trends]. Malmö: Liber förlag.
   Google Scholar
• HowarthD., 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HowarthD., 2004. Towards a Heideggerian social science: Heidegger, Kisiel and Weiner on the limits of anthropological discourse. Anthropological theory, 4 (2), 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• HowsonR., 2006. Challenging hegemonic masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• JohanssonT. and KlinthR., 2008. Caring fathers: the ideology of gender equality and masculine positions. Men and masculinities, 11 (1), 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohanssonT., 2011a. Fatherhood in transition: paternity leave and changing masculinities. Journal of family communication, 11 (3), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• JohanssonT., 2011b. The construction of the new father: how middle-class men become present fathers. International review of modern sociology, 37 (1), 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M.S., Hearn, J., Connell, R.W., eds., 2005. Handbook of studies on men & masculinities. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• LaclauE., 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• LaclauE. and MouffeC., 1985/2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed.London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• MarchartO., 2007. Post-foundational political thought: political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MesserschmidtJ.W., 2008. And now, the rest of the story: a commentary on Christine Beasley's rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and masculinities, 11 (1), 104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MesserschmidtJ.W., 2012. Engendering gendered knowledge: assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and masculinities, 15 (1), 56–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MollerM., 2007. Exploiting patterns: a critique of hegemonic masculinity. Journal of gender studies, 16 (3), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MouffeC., 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• MouffeC., 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MulhallS., 1996. Heidegger and being and time. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NicholsonL.J., 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RicoeurP., 1986. Lectures on ideology and utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• StyhreA., 2010. Visual culture in organizations: theory and cases. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WedgewoodN., 2009. Connell's theory of masculinity – its origin and influences in the study of gender. Journal of gender studies, 18 (4), 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar