Subverting gendered norms of cohabitation: Living Apart Together for women over 45

References

• Asendorpf, J.B., 2008. Living apart together: Altersund. Kohner zeitschrift fur soziologie und sozialpsycholgie, 60, 749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2009. 4102.0 – Australian social trends, March 2009. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011a. 6105.0 – Australian labour market statistics, October 2011. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011b. 6310.0 – Employee earnings, benefits and trade union membership, Australia 2011. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012. 4102.0 – Australian social trends, September 2012. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., 1993. Work at home: the domestic division of labour. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., 2000. The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34, 609–631.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, M., 1991. Juggling time. Canberra: The Office of the Status of Women, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, M., 1995. Recent changes in unpaid work. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 4154.0.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, M. and Pixley, J., 1997. The double life of the family. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bulbeck, C., 2012. Imagining the future: young Australians on sex, love and community. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Martin, T., Dominguez-Folgueras, M. and Martin-Garcia, T., 2008. Not truly partnerless: non residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain. Demographic research, 18, 436–468.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong Gierveld, J., 2004. Remarriage, unmarried cohabitiation, living apart together: partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of marriage and family, 66, 236–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, K., 2002. Who gets the best deal from marriage: women or men?Journal of sociology, 38, 91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., 1996. Interpretive ethnography: ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. and Phillips, M., 2010. People who live apart together (LATs) – how different are they?The sociological review, 58, 112–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermisch, J. and Siedler, T., 2008. Living apart together. In: M.Brynin and J.Ermisch, eds. Changing relationships. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge, 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M., 2005. Mapping loneliness in Australia. Canberra: The Australia Institute, February, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1992. The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haskey, J., 2005. Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT). Population trends, 122, 35–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haskey, J. and Lewis, J., 2006. Living-apart-together in Britain: context and meaning. International journal of law in context, 2, 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Leavy, P., 2011. The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasawa, M., 2004. Partnership transition in contemporary Japan: prevalence of non-cohabiting couples. Japanese journal of population, 2, 76–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., 1999. Heterosexuality in question. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L., 1999. Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology, 33, 477–494.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S.G. and Borell, K., 2005. A home of their own. Women's boundary work in LAT-relationships. Journal of aging studies, 19, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S.G., et al., 2007. Caring while living apart. Journal of gerontological social work, 49, 3–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin, I., 2004. Living apart together: a new family form. Current sociology, 52, 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Maushart, S., 2001. Wifework: what marriage really means for women. Melbourne: Text.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, A. and Peters, A., 2003. Couples living apart. Canadian social trends. Statistics Canada, 11, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier-Loilier, A., Beaujouan, E. and Villeneuve-Gokalp, C., 2009. Neither single, nor in a couple: a study of living apart together in France. Demographic research, 21, 75–108.
   Google Scholar
• Reimondos, A., Evans, A. and Gray, E., 2011. Living-apart-together (LAT) relationships in Australia. Family matters, 87, 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., 1996. Heterosexuality and social theory. In: D.Richardson, ed. Theorising heterosexuality: telling it straight. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., 2000. Evaluating ethnography. Qualitative inquiry, 6, 253–255.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S., 2006. On not living with a partner: Unpacking coupledom and cohabitation. Sociological Research Online. www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/roseneil.htm.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, R., 2012. Bridging theory and experience: a critical-interpretive ethnography of sexuality and disability. In: R.Mcruer and A.Mollow, eds. Sex and disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strohm, C.Q., et al., 2009. ‘Living apart together’ relationships in the United States. Demographic research, 21, 177–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, M., 1994. On method and hope. In: A.Gitlin, ed. Power and method. London: Routledge, 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2011. Measurement of different emerging forms of households and families. The conference of European statisticions' task force on families and households. New York, NY and Geneva: United Nations, 1–94.
   Google Scholar
• Upton-Davis, K., 2012. Living apart together relationships (LAT): severing intimacy from obligation. Gender issues, 29, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hooff, J.H., 2011. Rationalising inequality: heterosexual couples' explanations and justifications for the division of housework along traditionally gendered lines. Journal of gender studies, 20, 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar