Equality, empowerment, and choice: what does feminism mean to contemporary women?

References

• AbowitzD. A. (2008). The campus F word: Feminist self-identification (and not) among undergraduates. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 34, 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• AckerJ., BarryK., & EsseveldJ. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 423–435. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(83)90035-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AronsonE., WilsonT. D., & AkertR. M. (2007). Social psychology (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• AronsonP. (2003). Feminists or ‘postfeminists’?: Young women's attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17, 903–922. doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203257145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BargadA., & HydeJ. S. (1991). Women's studies: A study of feminist development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181–201. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00791.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman-FinkC., & VerderberK. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00860.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoydC. (1989). Mothers and daughters: A discussion of theory and research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 291–301. doi:10.2307/352493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Highlights of women's earnings in, 2011, Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ChakravartyK. (2011). Much less religious, a little more spiritual: The religious and spiritual views of third-wave feminists in the UK. Feminist Review, 97, 32–55. doi:10.1057/fr.2010.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CowanG., MestlinM., & MasekJ. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321–330. doi:10.1007/BF00289942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeauxK., ReidA., MizrahiK., & CottingD. (1999). Connecting the personal to the social: The functions of social identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DuncanL. E. (2010). Women's relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 498–507. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01599.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EiseleH., & StakeJ. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233–244. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ExC. T., & JanssensJ. M. (1998). Maternal influences on daughters' gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 38, 171–186. doi:10.1023/A:1018776931419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisK. L., MelaasK., & RodackerE. (1999). The impact of women's studies courses on college students of the 1990s. Sex Roles, 40, 969–977. doi:10.1023/A:1018885407873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson-KingD., & StewartA. J. (1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on women's experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415–426. doi:10.1177/0146167297234007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooksB. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• HouvourasS., & Scott CarterJ. (2008). The F word: College students' definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234–256. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00072.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacksonL. A., FleuryR. E., & LewandowskiD. A. (1996). Feminism: Definitions, support, and correlates of support among female and male college students. Sex Roles, 34-34, 687–693. doi:10.1007/BF01551502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JaggerA. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenhied.
   Google Scholar
• KaneE. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419–439. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatzJ., SwindellS., & FarrowS. (2004). Effects of participation in a first women's studies course on collective self-esteem, gender-related attitudes, and emotional well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2179–2199. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02696.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlonoffA. E., & LandrineH. (1995). The schedule of sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–470. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeaperC., & AriasD. M. (2011). College women's feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64, 475–490. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabeJ. (2005). What's in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and feminist attitudes among U.S. women and men. Gender and Society, 19, 480–505. doi:10.1177/0891243204273498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyaskovskyL., & WittigM A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861–883. doi:10.1007/BF02936344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonJ. A., LissM., ErchullM. J., HurtM. M., RamseyL. R., TurnerD. I., & HainesM. E. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721–728. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReidA., & PurcellN. (2004). Pathways to feminist identification. Sex Roles, 50, 759–769. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029095.40767.3c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobnettR. D., AndersonK. J., & HunterL. E. (2012). Predicting feminist identity: Associations between gender-traditional attitudes, feminist stereotyping, and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 67, 143–157. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0170-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinghS. (2007). Deconstructing ‘gender and development’ for ‘identities of women’. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 100–109. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwirskyJ. M., & AngeloneD. J. (2014). Femi-nazis and bra burning crazies: A qualitative evaluation of contemporary beliefs about feminism. Current Psychology, 33, 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TongR. (2009). Feminist thought. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• WalbyS. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23, 213–234. doi:10.1177/0038038589023002004.
   Google Scholar
• WalkerA. J., & ThompsonL. (1984). Feminism and family studies. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 545–570. doi:10.1177/019251384005004010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilkinsonS. (1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 221–244. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00355.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsR., & WittigM. A. (1997). ‘I'm not a feminist, but…’: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904. doi:10.1007/BF02936345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar