(Re)creating gender hierarchies within northern landscapes: a study of stories about nature and gender

References

• Aarseth, H. (2007). Between labour and love: The re-erotization of home-making in Egalitarian couples within a Nordic context. NORA – Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies , 15 , 133–143.10.1080/08038740701511669
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective feelings or, the impressions left by others. Theory, Culture & Society , 21 , 25–42.10.1177/0263276404042133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. , Squire, C. , & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2013). Doing narrative research . Los Angeles, CA : Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aure, M. , & Munkejord, M. C. (2015). Creating a man for the future: A narrative analysis of male in-migrants and their constructions of rural masculinities. Sociologia Ruralis . doi:10.1111/soru.12111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandth, B. , & Haugen, M. S. (2005). Doing rural masculinity – From logging to outfield tourism. Journal of Gender Studies , 14 , 13–22.10.1080/0958923042000331452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bye, L. M. (2009). ‘How to be a rural man’: Young men’s performances and negotiations of rural masculinities. Journal of Rural Studies , 25 , 278–288.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullum, L. (2003). Narratives at work. Women, men, unionization, and the fashioning of identities . Newfoundland: ISER Books, University of Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism . Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Flemmen, A. B. (2007). Russiske kvinner i nordnorske aviser – minoritets- og majoritetskonstruksjoner [Russian women in north-Norwegian newspapers: Constructions of minorities and majorities]. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning , 1 , 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Flemmen, A. B. (2008). Transnational marriages – Empirical complexities and theoretical challenges. An exploration of intersectionality. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research , 16 , 114–129.10.1080/08038740802140244
   Google Scholar
• Førde, A. , & Magnussen, T. (2012). Når hundekjeksen tar over – opplevingar av stad gjennom landskap [When the cow parsley (anthriscus sylvestris) takes over. Experiences of place through landscapes]. In M. B. Bringslid (Ed.), Bygdeutviklingas paradoks (pp. 91–118). Oslo: Spartacus.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, G. (2001). The difference that space makes. A way to describe the construction of local and regional gender contracts. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift , 55 , 161–165.10.1080/002919501753129916
   Google Scholar
• Frohlick, S. , Dragojlovic, A. , & Piscitelli, A. (2015). Introduction: Foreign travel, transnational sex, and transformations of heterosexualities. Gender, Place and Culture , 23 , 235–242. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2015.1034999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, S. (2005). Living with the fish quotas: Changing gendered practices? Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning , 29 , 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, S. (2013). Mobilities, materialities, and masculinities: Interconnected mobility practices in Norwegian coastal fisheries. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography , 67 , 312–319.10.1080/00291951.2013.847482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies . Stanford, CA: The Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. (2006). Plausible prejudice . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Gurholt, K. P. (2008). Norwegian friluftsliv and ideals of becoming an ‘educated man’. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning , 8 , 55–70.10.1080/14729670802097619
   Google Scholar
• Haavind, H. (1994). Kjønn i forandring – som fenomen og forståelsemåte [Gender in flux as a phenomenon and as a way of understanding]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologiforening , 31 , 767–783.
   Google Scholar
• Haavind, H. (1998). Understanding women in the psychological mode: The challenge from the experiences of Nordic women. In D. von der Fehr , B. Rosenbeck , & A. G. Jónasdóttir (Eds.), Is there a Nordic feminism? Nordic feminist thought on culture and society (pp. 243–271). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haavind, H. (1999). Kjønn og fortolkende metode. Metodiske muligheter i kvalitativ metode [Gender and interpretative methodology. Methodological opportunities in qualitative research]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, L. , & Olsen, K. (2012). Livsstilsmigrasjon i nordområdene [Lifestyle migration in the barents region]. Nordisk Østforum , 26 , 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. (2002). Gender and rural geography. Identity, sexuality and power in the countryside . Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. , & Panelli, R. (2007). ‘Outback’ romance? A reading of nature and heterosexuality in rural Australia. Sociologia Ruralis , 47 , 173–188.10.1111/soru.2007.47.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place. Understanding feminist feographies . Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist . Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). Kroppens fenomenologi [Phenomenology of the body] . København: Pax Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture, and society (pp. 68–87). Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, K. G. , & Humberstone, B. (2000). Gendered ‘natural’ spaces: A comparison of contemporary women’s experiences of outdoor adventure (UK) and friluftsliv (Norway). In B. Humberstone (Ed.), Her outdoors. Risk, challgenge and adventure in gendered open spaces (pp. 101–111). Bolton, UK: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. , Hockey, J. , & Meah, A. (2004). ‘What I used to do … on my Mother’s settee’: Spatial and emotional aspects of heterosexuality in England. Gender, Place and Culture , 11 , 417–435.10.1080/0966369042000258712
   Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, M. Z. (2001). Women, culture and society. A theoretical overview. In M. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, culture & society (pp. 17–42). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. (Ed.). (2001). Praksis, rum og mobilitet. Socialgeografiske bidrag [Practice, space and mobility: Contributions from human geography]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. (2005). Byens mange ansigter – konstruktion af byen i praksis og fortælling [The many faces of the city. Constructions of the city through practices and stories]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. , & Fairbrother, P. (2013). Bushfires are “men’s business”: The importance of gender and rural hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Rural Studies , 30 , 110–119.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. , Valestrand, H. , Gerrard, S. , & Aure, M. (2013). Gendered mobilities in the North: Advancing an international comparative perspective. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography , 67 , 260–265.10.1080/00291951.2013.847857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiestad, E. (2007). Romlig selv. Med vekt på kjønn og lokalisering [Spatial selves, gender and context]. Norsk filosofisk tidsskrift, 42 , 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1999). How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice (pp. 64–78). London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208857
   Google Scholar