1,740
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

New kinships, new family formations and negotiations of intimacy via social media sites

Pages 361-371 | Received 14 Dec 2015, Accepted 24 Jan 2017, Published online: 08 Feb 2017

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388074
  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392781
  • Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life . London: Sage.
  • Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age . Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry , 24 , 281–288.10.1086/448875
  • Berlant, L. (2008). The female complaint . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822389163
  • Blyth, E. , Crawshaw, M. , Frith, L. , & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine , 19 , 769–789.
  • Bos, H. (2013). Lesbian-mother families formed through donor insemination. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parents families (pp. 21–37). New York, NY : Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-4556-2
  • Broom, A. , Hand, K. , & Tovey, P. (2009). The role of gender, environment and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 12 , 51–65.
  • Dahl, U. (2014). Not gay as in happy, but queer as in fuck you. Lambda Nordica , 3–4 , 143–168.
  • De Ridder, S. (2015). Are digital media institutions shaping youth’s intimate stories? New Media & Society , 17 , 356–374.10.1177/1461444813504273
  • Duncan, S. , Phillips, M. , Roseneil, S. , Carter, J. , & Stoilova, M. (2013). Living apart together: Uncoupling intimacy and co-residence. The Sociology Teacher , 3 , 4–11.
  • Ellison, N. , & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Emerson, R. M. , Fretz, R. I. , & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson , A. Coffey , S. Delamont , J. Lofland , & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 356–357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Eng, D. (2010). The feeling of kinship . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392828
  • Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822378259
  • Frankin, S. , & McKinnon, S. (Eds.). (2001). Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Franklin, S. , & Ragoné, H. (Eds.). (1998). Reproducing reproduction: Kinship power and technological innovations . Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Freeman, T. , Jadva, V. , Kramer, W. , & Golombok, S. (2009). Gamete donation: Parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor sibling and donor. Human Reproduction , 24 , 505–516.
  • Hertz, R. , & Mattes, J. (2011). Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers: New families, clans, and the Internet. Journal of Family Issues , 32 , 1129–1155.10.1177/0192513X11404345
  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2006). The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. In Hesse-Biber, S.N. & Leavy, P. (Eds.), The practice of qualitative research (pp. 111–148). London: Sage.
  • Internet World Stats . (2015). Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm#europe
  • Kovacs, G. T. , Wise, S. , & Finch, S. (2012). Functioning of families with primary school-age children conceived using anonymous donor sperm. Human Reproduction , 28 , 375–384.
  • Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined . London: Sage.
  • Kroløkke, C. , Myong, L. , Adrian, S. W. , & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (Eds.). (2016). Critical kinship studies . London: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Kunstman, A. , & Karatzogianni, A. (Eds.). (2012). Digital cultures and the politics of emotions . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Livingstone, S. , Van Couvering, E. , & Thumin, N. (2008). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies. In J. Coiro , M. Knobel , C. Lankshear , & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 103–132). New York, NY : Routledge.
  • Markham, A. (2012). Fabrication as ethical practice. Information, Communication and Society , 15 , 334–353.10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993
  • Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practices and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In Maynard, M. & Purvis, J. (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10–16). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Myong, L. (2009). Adopteret – Fortællinger om transnational og racialiseret tilblivelse [Adopted: Stories of transnational and racialised subjectification] (Doctoral dissertation). University of Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate citizenship: Personal decisions and public dialogues . Seattle : University of Washington Press.
  • Rodríguez, J. M. (2014). Sexual futures, queer gestures and other Latina longings . New York : New York University Press.
  • Scott, J. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry , 17 , 773–797.10.1086/448612
  • Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction . London: SAGE.
  • Tasker, F. (2013). Lesbian and gay parenting post-heterosexual divorce and separation. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parents families (pp. 3–20). New York, NY : Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-4556-2
  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other . New York, NY : Basic Books.
  • van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity . Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.