A pen that ‘looks like a CEO in a business suit’: gendering the fountain pen

References

• Aaltojärvi, I. A. (2012). “That mystic device only women can use” – Ascribing gender to domestic technologies. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 4(2), 208–230.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, J. (1989). Form/female follows function/male: Feminist critiques of design. In J. A. Walker (Ed.), Design history and the history of design (pp. 199–225). London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, J. (1996). Barbie and action man: Adult toys for girls and boys, 1959–93. In P. Kirkham (Ed.), The gendered object (pp. 80–89). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auster, C. J., & Mansbach, C. S. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the Disney store website. Sex Roles, 67(7/8), 375–388.10.1007/s11199-012-0177-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre, M., Mills, J., & Gill, J. (2011). Two steps forward, one step back: Women in professional engineering in Australia. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(2), 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Duschinsky, R. (2012). Sexualisation’s four faces: Sexualisation and gender stereotyping in the Bailey review. Gender and Education, 24(3), 303–310.10.1080/09540253.2012.660136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A., & Lie, M. (1995). Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20(3), 332–351.10.1177/016224399502000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society, 14(3), 418–434.10.1177/089124300014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. (1986). Made in patriarchy: Toward a feminist analysis of women and design. Design Issues, 3(2), 3–14.10.2307/1511480
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1997). Domestic technologies: Cinderella and the engineers. Women’s studies International forum, 20(3), 361–371.10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00020-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. & Fürst-Dilic, R. (Eds.). (1994). Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (2005). Men and masculinities in work, organizations and management. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 289–310). London: Sage.10.4135/9781452233833
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., & Wood, J. (2005). Globalization and business masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 7(4), 347–364.10.1177/1097184X03260969
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards an institutional analysis. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(1), 91–103.10.1111/gwao.2014.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, K. (2002). Wearing gender and sexuality “On your sleeve”: Dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work. Gender Issues, 20(1), 3–25.10.1007/s12147-002-0005-5
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnberger, K., Räsänen, M., & Ilstedt, S. (2012). Visualising gender norms in design: Meet the Mega Hurricane Mixer and the drill Dolphia. International Journal of Design, 6(3), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(1), 79–95.10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forty, A. (1986). Objects of desire: Design and society since 1750. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K. & Gill, R. (Eds.). (1995). The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hendershot, H. (1996). Dolls: Odour, femininity and toy design. In P. Kirkham (Ed.), The gendered object (pp. 90–102). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M., Sklar, M., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2011). Men at work: Using dress to communicate identities. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 412–427.10.1108/13612021111169924
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, P. (2013). Understanding the role of organizations in the occupational status of industrial designers through the exploration of dress and appearance norms. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 30(2), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. C. (2010). Pink technology: Mediamaking gear for girls. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, 25(2), 1–39.10.1215/02705346-2010-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelan, E. K. (2013). The becoming of business bodies: Gender, appearance, and leadership development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45–61.10.1177/1350507612469009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, L. J., Angell, L. C., & McLoughlin, L. (2015). The symbolic meaning of artifacts for the workplace identity of women in academia. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(5), 379–396.10.1108/GM-07-2013-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, P. (Ed.). (1996). The gendered object. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, P. (Ed.). (2000). Women designers in the USA 1900–2000: Diversity and difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleif, T., & Faulkner, W. (2003). “I’m no athlete [but] I can make this thing dance!” – Men’s pleasures in technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 28(2), 296–325.10.1177/0162243902250908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, N., Oldenziel, R., & Mohun, A. P. (Eds.). (2003). Gender and technology: A reader. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. (2008). Performing gender in the workplace: Gender socialization, power, and identity among women faculty members. Community College Review, 35(4), 277–305.10.1177/0091552108314756
   Google Scholar
• Lie, M. (1995). Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 2(3), 379–394.10.1177/135050689500200306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(3), 25–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaw, J. A. (2003). Why feminine technologies matter. In N. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A. P. Mohun (Eds.), Gender and technology: A reader (pp. 13–36). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKellar, S. (1996). Guns: The “last frontier on the road to equality”. In P. Kirkham (Ed.), The gendered object (pp. 60–69). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E., & Kolb, D. M. (2000). “Moving out of the armchair”: Developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, 7(4), 553–571.10.1177/135050840074003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nemoto, K. (2013). When culture resists progress: Masculine organizational culture and its impacts on the vertical segregation of women in Japanese companies. Work, employment and society, 27(1), 153–169.10.1177/0950017012460324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy, N. (1996). Bicycles. In P. Kirkham (Ed.), The gendered object (pp. 60–69). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. (2003). Why masculine technologies matter. In N. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A. P. Mohun (Eds.), Gender and technology: A reader (pp. 37–71). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized gender: How shavers configure the user’s femininity and masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The construction of users and technology (pp. 193–208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osgerby, B. (2003). A pedigree of the consuming male: Masculinity, consumption and the American “leisure class”. The Sociological Review, 51(S1), 57–85.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2003.tb03603.x
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., Saetnan, A., & Lie, M. (2002). On gender and things: Reflections on an exhibition on gendered artifacts. Women's Studies International Forum, 25(4), 471–483.10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00284-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, J. K., Harris, C., Ravenswood, K., Giddings, L., Ryan, I., & Jaeger, S. (2017). Women’s career progression in law firms: Views from the top, views from below. Gender, Work and Organization, 24(4), 435–449.10.1111/gwao.v24.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priola, V. (2007). Being female doing gender: Narratives of women in education management. Gender and Education, 19(1), 21–40.10.1080/09540250601087728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommes, E., Bos, M., & Geerdink, J. O. (2011). Design and use of gender specific and gender stereotypical toys. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(1), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, E., van Oost, E., & Oudshoorn, N. (1999). Gender in the design of the digital city of Amsterdam. Information, Communication & Society, 2(4), 476–495.10.1080/136911899359510
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational cultures, women managers and exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16(8), 371–382.10.1108/EUM0000000006289
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, V. (1991). Taking the wheel: Women and the coming of the motor age. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. (1996). Hearing aids: Sweet nothings, or an ear for an ear. In P. Kirkham (Ed.), The gendered object (pp. 60–69). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, R., & Decker, M. (2008). A car of her own: Volvo’s “Your Concept Car” as a vehicle for feminism? Studies in Popular Culture, 30(2), 100–118.
   Google Scholar
• Shade, L. R. (2007). Feminizing the mobile: Gender scripting of mobiles in North America. Continuum, 21(2), 179–189.10.1080/10304310701269032
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (2009). Men in caring occupations: Doing gender differently. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230594333
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, P. (1995). As long as it’s pink: Sexual politics of taste. London: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., Backman, M., & Börjesson, S. (2005). The gendered machine: Concept car development at Volvo car corporation. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(6), 551–571.10.1111/gwao.2005.12.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., & Johansson, T. (2016). Leadership varieties: The role of economic change and the new masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van der Velden, M., & Mörtberg, C. (2012). Between need and desire: Exploring strategies for gendering design. Science, Technology & Human Values, 37(6), 663–683.10.1177/0162243911401632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar