Legitimate subjects: diverse pedagogical practices and gendered subjectivities in high school classrooms

References

• Allard, A. C. (2004). Speaking of gender: Teachers’ metaphorical constructs of male and female students. Gender and Education, 16(3), 347–363.10.1080/09540250042000251489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2012). It’s no laughing matter: Boys’ humour and the performance of defensive masculinities in the classroom. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(3), 239–251.10.1080/09589236.2012.691648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2002a). Competing discourses in the classroom: A post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 827–842.10.1177/0957926502013006760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2002b). A juggling act: A feminist post-structuralist analysis of girls’ and boys’ talk in the secondary classroom. Gender and Education, 14, 5–19.10.1080/09540250120098843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230501263
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2008). Feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis: A new theoretical and methodological approach? In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 243–255). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2010). Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 117–137). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall, V. L. (1998). Constructing and enacting gender through discourse: Negotiating multiple roles as female engineering students. In V. L. Bergvall, J. M. Bing, & A. F. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research (pp. 173–201). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.10.2307/3207893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge. ( Original work published 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Castaneda-Pena, H. (2008). Interwoven and competing gendered discourses in a pre-school EFL lesson. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 256–268). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chasnoff,  D. (Director). (2009). Straightlaced [Documentary]. Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ: New Day Films. 
   Google Scholar
• Christian-Smith, L. K. (1993). Texts of desire: Essays on fiction, femininity, and schooling. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobbett, M. C. (2013). ‘Beauties’, ‘geeks’ and ‘men-john’: The possibilities and costs of girls’ performances of gender in Antiguan schools. Gender and Education, 25(3), 251–266.10.1080/09540253.2012.721538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, M. (2003). Educating the ‘variant’, educating the public: Gender and the rhetoric of legitimation in The Ladder magazine for lesbians. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 233–255.10.1023/A:1022919129613
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1989). Frogs and snails and feminist tales. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2003). Shards of glass. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Banks, C. (1992). The gender trap: A feminist poststructuralist analysis of primary school children’s talk about gender. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(1), 1–25.10.1080/0022027920240101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1997). Jockeying for position: The construction of masculine identities. Discourse & Society, 8(2), 203–217.
10.1177/0957926597008002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault ,M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction (R.Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon. ( Original work published 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (1999). Modernist reductionism or post-structuralist relativism: Can we move on? An evaluation of the arguments in relation to feminist educational research. Gender and Education, 11(4), 381–393.10.1080/09540259920465
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2008a). Teaching manfully? Exploring gendered subjectivities and power via analysis of men teachers’ gender performance. Gender and Education, 20(2), 109–122.10.1080/09540250701797226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2008b). Engendering debate: How to formulate a political analysis of the divide between genetic bodies and discursive gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 17(3), 211–223.10.1080/09589230802204241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2010). Re/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom? Gender and Education, 22(5), 477–490.10.1080/09540250903341146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2012). Gender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(1), 1–15.10.1080/09589236.2012.639174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., & Paechter, C. (2015). The problem of gender categorisation: Addressing dilemmas past and present in gender and education research. Gender and Education, 27(7), 776–790.10.1080/09540253.2015.1092503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. ed). New York, NY: Continuum. ( Original work published 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P., & Taylor, S. (1992). Fashioning the feminine: Girls, popular culture and schooling. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257–293.10.17763/haer.53.3.a67x4u33g7682734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, J. (2003). What we can do for you! What can ‘we’ do for ‘you’? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 331–348). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groundspark. (2014). About the respect for all project. Retrieved from http://groundspark.org/respect-for-all
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamada, L. (2008). Discursive ‘embodied’ identities of ‘half’ girls in Japan: A multiperspective approach. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 174–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L. (1994). Making ‘hope practical’ rather than ‘despair convincing’: Feminist post‐structuralism, gender reform and educational change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 187–210.10.1080/0142569940150203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (1997). The social drama of literature discussions in a fifth/sixth grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(2), 163–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckmann, T. (1987). Comments on legitimation. Current Sociology, 35, 109–117.10.1177/001139287035002011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orner,  M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for student voice in ‘liberatory’ education: A feminist poststructuralist perspective. In  C.  Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C., & Clark, S. (2016). Being ‘nice’ or being ‘normal’: Girls resisting discourses of ‘coolness’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2010). Normative cruelties and gender deviants: The performative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 573–596.10.1080/01411920903018117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauntson, H. (2012). Approaches to gender and spoken classroom discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230343580
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1993). Transforming the texts: Towards a feminist classroom practice. In L. K. Christian-Smith (Ed.), Texts of desire: Essays on fiction, femininity, and schooling (pp. 126–144). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing social action. Discourse & Society, 6(1), 81–106.10.1177/0957926595006001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112.10.1177/1750481307071986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 144–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Critical discourse analysis and multimodality. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 281–296). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.10.1177/1461445699001001005
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change: Gender, class & power. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2005). Sex–gender–sexuality: How sex, gender and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools. Gender and Education, 17(3), 249–270.10.1080/09540250500145148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar