‘I was completely oblivious to gender’: an exploration of how women in STEMM navigate leadership in a neoliberal, post-feminist context

References

• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, S. (2012). Chairing and caring: Gendered dimensions of leadership in academe. Gender and Education, 24, 411–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, F. (2007). Sluts and riot grrrls: Female identity and sexual agency. Journal of Gender Studies, 16, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65, 157–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2009). Women in science: Maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Report prepared for the Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies. Retrieved from: https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/28877/264253_2009_bell_women_report.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel optimism. Differences, 17(3), 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bismark, M., Morris, J., Thomas, L., Loh, E., Phelps, G., & Dickinson, H. (2015). Reasons and remedies for under-representation of women in medical leadership roles: A qualitative study from Australia. BMJ Open, 5. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2006). Deconstructing diversity discourses in the field of educational management and leadership. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 34, 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 433–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 244–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coate, K., & Howson, C. K. (2016). Indicators of esteem: Gender and prestige in academic work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37, 567–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, J., Harris, P., & Thiele, B. (2000). Sacrifices in greedy universities: Are they gendered? Gender and Education, 12, 269–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. A. (2015). Champions of gender equality: Female and male executives as leaders of gender change. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 34, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, A. (2004). Women, research and the politics of professional development. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 591–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pwq
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65, 216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for Women’s Leadership Development Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 474–493. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41318068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, R., & Pringle, J. K. (2000). Women CEOs in New Zealand: Where are you? Women in Management Review, 15, 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2010). Life is a pitch: Managing the self in new media work. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work (pp. 249–262). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2011). Sexism reloaded, or, it’s time to get angry again! Feminist Media Studies, 11, 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R, & Orgad, S. (2015). The confidence cult (ure). Australian Feminist Studies, 30, 324-344. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2016.1148001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, G., Bradley, H., & Forson, C. (2011). Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 18, 467–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersson, C. (2013). Recruiting managing directors: Doing homosociality. Gender, Work and Organisation, 20, 454–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvino, E. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 248–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvino, E., & Blake-Beard, S. (2004). Women discussing their differences: A promising trend. The Diversity Factor, 12(3), 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/academic/academic-search-ultimate
   Google Scholar
• Kelan, E. K. (2009). Gender fatigue: The ideological dilemma of gender neutrality and discrimination in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Baker, C. (2016). White knights: Leadership as the heroicisation of whiteness. Leadership, 12, 420–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumby, J., & Morrison, M. (2010). Leadership and diversity: Theory and research. School Leadership & Management, 30, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, T. W., Toussaint, L. L., & Schweiger, J. A. (2004). The influence of social status on token women leaders’ expectations about leading male-dominated groups. Sex Roles, 50, 401–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2004). Post‐feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2000). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 126–136. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/academic/business-source-ultimate
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25, 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 114–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2016). Troubling intra-actions: Gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy. Journal of Education Policy, 31, 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favour male students. Proceedings Natural Academic Sciences, 109, 16474–16479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M, Davies, A, & Moore, R. (2017). What style of leadership do women in STEMM fields perform? Findings from an international survey. Plos One, 12(10), e0185727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double-bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–208. Retrieved from Proquest 201201306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, C. (1997). Charting the currents of the Third Wave. Hypatia, 12(3), 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsley, R., Beavis, A. S., & Clifford-Hordacre, N. (2016). Busting myths about women in STEM. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/OCS-paper-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., Rhodes, C., & Thanem, T. (2017). Affective politics in gendered organizations: Affirmative notes on becoming-woman. Organization, 24, 105–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, A., Jones, D., Vasquez, C. R., & Krisjanous, J. (2016). Confronting gender inequality in a business school. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 1025–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, P. A. (2008). Together but unequal: Combating gender inequity in the academy. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13, 185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfelt, D., & Stacey, J. (1990). Second thoughts on the Second Wave. In K. V. Hansen & I. J. Philipsen (Eds.), Women, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialist-feminist reader (pp. 549–567). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28, 418–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). “The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Savigny, H. (2014). Women, know your limits: Cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education, 26, 794–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheltzer, J. M., & Smith, J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings Natural Academic Sciences, 111, 10107–10112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steidl, C. R., & Sterk, C. E. (2016). Interpreting productivity: Symbolic negotiation of gendered faculty career trajectories in the United States. Symbolic Interaction, 39, 595–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stempel, C. R., Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2015). Think transformational leadership – Think female? Leadership, 11, 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobe, K., Dovidio, J. F., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., & John, M. (2011). Is the world a just place? Countering the negative consequences of pervasive discrimination by affirming the world as just. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 484–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. R., & Delaney, S. (2016). A femininity that ‘giveth and taketh away’: The prosperity gospel and postfeminisim in the neoliberal economy. Human Relations, 70, 836–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2015). Women in science. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/ScienceTechnology/Documents/fs34-2015-women%20in%20science-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., & Hall, E. V. (2014). Double jeopardy? Gender bias against women of color in science. Retrieved from http://www.uchastings.edu/news/articles/2015/01/double-jeopardy-report.pdf
   Google Scholar