852
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Navigating, challenging, and contesting normative gendered discourses surrounding women’s pornography use

ORCID Icon
Pages 578-590 | Received 02 Oct 2018, Accepted 01 Mar 2019, Published online: 28 Mar 2019

References

  • Abbot, S. A. (2010). Motivations for pursuing a career in pornography. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography and the sex industry (2nd ed., pp. 47–66). New York: Routledge.
  • Abramson, P. R., & Pinkerton, S. D. (1995). With pleasure. Thoughts on the nature of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Attwood, F. (2002). Reading porn: The paradigm shift in pornography research. Sexualities, 5, 91–105.
  • Attwood, F. (2005). Fashion and passion: Marketing sex to women. Sexualities, 8, 392–406.
  • Boulton, C. (2008). Porn and me(n): Sexual morality, objectification and religion at the wheelock anti-porn conference. The Communication Review, 11, 247–273.
  • Boynton, P. M. (1999). ‘Is that supposed to be sexy?’ Women discuss women in ‘Top Shelf’ magazines. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 449–461.
  • Bryson, V. (2003). Feminist political theory: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Busby, K. (1999). LEAF and pornography: Litigating on equality and sexual representations. In N. Larsen & B. Burtch (Eds.), Law in society. Canadian readings (pp. 42–60). Toronto: Nelson.
  • Carol, A., & Pollard, N. (1993). Changing perceptions in the feminist debate. In A. Assister & A. Carol (Eds.), Bad girls and dirty pictures. The challenge to reclaim feminism (pp. 45–56). London: Pluto Press.
  • Ciclitira, K. (2004). Pornography, women and feminism: Between pleasure and politics. Sexualities, 7, 281–301.
  • Cooper, A., McLoughlin, I., & Campbell, K. (2000). Sexuality in cyberspace: Update for the 21st century. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 7–14.
  • Cowan, G., & Campbell, R. (1994). Racism and sexism in interracial pornography: A content analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 323–338.
  • Davies, K. (1997). Voluntary exposure to pornography and men’s attitudes toward feminism and rape. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 131–137.
  • DeVoss, D. (2002). Women’s porn sites: Spaces of fissure and eruption or ‘I’m a little bit of everything’. Sexuality and Culture, 6, 75–94.
  • Dines, G. (2010). PornLand: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Friedman, A. (2003). Sadists and sissies: Anti-pornography campaigns in cold war America. Gender and History, 15, 201–227.
  • Gossett, J. L., & Byrne, S. (2002). ‘Click here’: A content analysis of internet rape sites. Gender and Society, 16, 689–709.
  • Griffith, J. D., Mitchell, S., Hart, C. L., Adams, L. T., & Gu, L. L. (2012). Pornography actresses: An assessment of the damaged goods hypothesis. Journal of Sex Research, e-pub, 1–12.
  • Juffer, J. (1998). At home with pornography: Women, sex and everyday life. New York: New York University Press.
  • Kipnis, L. (1996). Bound and gagged: Pornography and the politics of fantasy in America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kukkonen, T. M., Binik, Y. M., Amsel, R., & Carrier, S. (2007). Thermography as a physiological measure of sexual arousal in both men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 93–105.
  • Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs. Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.
  • Monk-Turner, E., & Purcell, H. C. (1999). Sexual violence in pornography: How prevalent is it? Gender Issues, 17, 58–67.
  • Parvez, F. (2006). The labour of pleasure: How perceptions of emotional labour impact women’s enjoyment of pornography. Gender and Society, 20, 605–631.
  • Paul, P. (2005). Pornified. How pornography is damaging our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Holt.
  • Polan, M. L., Desmond, J. E., Banner, L. L., Pryor, M. R., McCallum, S. W., Atlas, S. W., … Arnow, B. A. (2003). Female sexual arousal: A behavioural analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 1480–1487.
  • Regnerus, M., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2016). Documenting pornography use in America: A comparative analysis of methodological approaches. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 873–881.
  • Rice, C. (2009). Imagining the other? Ethical challenges of researching and writing women’s embodied lives. Feminism and Psychology, 19, 245–266.
  • Ross, M. W., Månsson, S.-A., Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Tikkanen, R. (2005). Biases in internet sexual health samples: Comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 245–252.
  • Ryberg, I. (2013). ‘Every time we fuck, we win’: The public sphere of queer, feminist, and lesbian as a (safe) space for sexual empowerment. In T. Taormino, C. Parreñas Shimizu, C. Penley, & M. Miller-Young (Eds.), The feminist porn book. The politics of producing pleasure (pp. 140–154). New York: The Feminist Press.
  • Senn, C. Y. (2003). Women’s multiple perspectives and experiences with pornography. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 319–341.
  • Slon, S. (2015). Sexuality in midlife and beyond. Boston: Harvard Health Publications.
  • Smith, C. (2007). One for the girls! The pleasures and practices of reading women’s porn. Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd.
  • Stein, M. C. (1990). The ethnography of an adult bookstore: Private scenes, public spaces. New York: Edwin Mellon Press.
  • Storr, M. (2002). Classy lingerie. Feminist Review, 71, 18–36.
  • Tewksbury, R. (1990). Patrons of porn: Research notes on the clientele of adult bookstores. Deviant Behaviour, 11, 259–271.
  • Thomas, J. A. (2010). Gay male pornography since stonewall. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography and the sex industry, (2nd ed., pp. 67–89). New York: Routledge.
  • van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Proulx, C. M., & Pasley, K. (2008). A comparison of internet and face-to-face (FTF) qualitative methods in studying relationships of gay men. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4, 181–204.
  • Williams, L. (2008). Screening sex. Durham, NJ: Duke University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.