576
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gendered perceptions in Punjab, Pakistan: structural inequity, oppression and emergence

Pages 386-402 | Received 12 Jun 2018, Accepted 21 Jun 2019, Published online: 01 Jul 2019

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
  • Alim, M. A. (2009). Changes in villagers’ knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes concerning gender roles and relations in Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 19(3), 300–310.
  • Bandura, A. B., & Bussey, K. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
  • Beutal, A. M., & Axinn, W. G. (2002). Gender, social change and educational attainment. Economic Development and Social Change, 51(1), 109–134.
  • Bhatti, F. (2014). Punjabi Families in Transition: An Intergenerational study of fertility and family Change (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh. UK.
  • Bradley, T., & Saigol, R. (2012). Religious values and beliefs and education for women in Pakistan. Development in Practice, 22(5–6), 675–688.
  • Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 477–487.
  • Bukhari, F. Y., & Ramzan, M. (2013). Gender discrimination: A myth or truth women status in Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 88–97.
  • Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423.
  • Chafetz, J. S. (1997). Feminist theory and sociology: Underutilized contributions for mainstream theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 97–120.
  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social sciences. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2004). Gender inequality and women’s agency. In M. Mohanty (Ed.), Readings in indian government and politics: Caste, class and gender (pp. 338–387). New Dehli: Sage Publications.
  • Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demography behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (Eds.). (2012). Social role theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Farooq, A., & Kayani, A. K. (2013). Changes in traditions and material exchanges: A study of a Punjabi rural community. South Asian Survey, 20(1), 150–161.
  • Farooq, A., & Kayani, A. K. (2014). Social dynamics in rural Punjab: Changes in gender roles, spatial mobility and decision making. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(5/6), 317–333.
  • Flax, J. (Ed.). (1999). Women Do Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Fuchs, C. (2015). Critical Theory. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc001. pp. 1-13
  • Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1988). Family change and gender differences: Implications for theory and practice. Family Relations, 37(1), 36–41.
  • Heyer, J. (2016). Rural gounders on the move in Western Tamil Nadu: 1981–2 to 2008–9. In P. J. Himanshu & G. Rodgers (Eds.), The changing village india: insights from longitudinal research (pp. 327–356). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
  • Jeffery, P. (2001). A uniform customary code? Marital breakdown and women’s economic entitlements in Rural Bijnor. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 35(1), 1–32.
  • Jeffery, P. (2016). Plain tales from the plains: A personal account of researching in Rural Bijnor over three decade, in Himanshu. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. In P. Jha & G. Rodgers (Eds.), The changing village India: Insights from longitudinal research (pp. 35–64). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Jeffery, P., & Jeffery, R. (1996). Don’t marry me to a Plowman. Oxford: Westview Press, Inc.
  • Jeffery, R., & Basu, A. M. (1996). Schooling as Contraception? In R. Jeffery & A. M. Basu (Eds.), Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility change in South Asia (pp. 15–47). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.
  • Kelkar, G. (2005). Development effectiveness through gender mainstreaming: gender equality and poverty reduction in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(44/45), 4690–4699.
  • Khan, A. (1999). Mobility of women and access to health and family planning services in Pakistan. Reproductive Health, 7(14), 39–48.
  • Langton, M. (1997). Grandmother’s law, company business and succession in changing Aboriginal land tenure systems. In G. Yunupingu (Ed.), Our Land is our Life (pp. 84–116). St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
  • Lay, K., & Daley, J. G. (2007). A critique of feminist theory. Advances in Social Work, 8(1), 49–61.
  • Lindsey, L. L. (2005). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Lips, H. M. (2008). Sex and gender: An introduction. Illionois: Waveland Press, Inc.
  • Lopez-Claros, A., & Zahidi, S. (2005). Women empowerment: Measuring the global gender gap (pp. 2005). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  • Lueptow, L. B., Garovich-Szabo, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80(1), 1–36.
  • Madhok, S. (2007). Autonomy, gendered subordination and transcultural dialogue. Journal of Global Ethics, 3(3), 335–357.
  • Marini, M. M. (1990). Sex and gender: what do we do? Sociological Forums, 5(1), 95–120.
  • Mason, C. (2000). A short history of Asia. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  • Mason, K. O. (1986). The status of Women: Conceptual and Methodological issues in Demographic Studies. The Eastern Sociological Society, 1(2), 284–300.
  • Mason, K. O. (2001). Gender and family systems in the fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 27(supplement), 160–176.
  • Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2003). Women’s empowerment and social context: Results from five Asian Countries. A Working Paper.
  • Naz, A., Hussain, M., Daraz, U., Khan, W., Khan, T., Salman, M., & Khan, M. S. (2013). A paradigm shift in women’s movement and gender reforms in Pakistan (A historical overview). Global Journal of Human Social Science Sociology and Culture, 13(1), 21–25.
  • Noronha, C., Jeffery, R., & Jeffery, P. with RECOUP India Research Team. (2008). Schooling, transitions and reproductive citizenship for poor people in urban and rural north India: Preliminary results from Alwar and Dewas. New Delhi, India: Research Consortium on Educational Outcomes and Poverty.
  • Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1699.
  • Predelli, L. N. (2004). Interpreting gender in Islam: A case study of immigrant Muslim women in Oslo, Norway. Gender and Society, 8(4), 473–493.
  • Riley, N. E. (1999). Challenging demography: Contributions from feminist theory. Paper presented at the Sociological Forum.
  • Sarkar, P. C. (2010). Women in Patriarchal Society. New Delhi: Serial Publication.
  • Sathar, A. Z., & Jejeeboy, S. J. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influences of religion and region. Political and Development Review, 27(4), 687–714.
  • Sathar, Z. A., & Kazi, S. (1997). Women’s Autonomy, Livelihood and Fertility. A Study of Rural Punjab. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Studies.
  • Sathar, Z. A., & Kazi, S. (2000). Women’s autonomy in the context of Rural Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 39(2), 89–110.
  • Sathar, Z. A., & Kiani, M. F. (1998). Some consequences of rising age at marriage in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 37(4), 541–556.
  • Serbin, L. A., Powlishta, K. K., Gulko, J., Martin, C. L., & Lockheed, M. E. (1993). The development of sex typing in middle childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(2), 1–99.
  • Shaffer, P. (1998). Gender, poverty and deprivation: Evidence from the Republic of Guinea’. World Development, 26(12), 2119–2135.
  • Sharma, P. (2014). Oligarchic patriarchal political culture of women participation in South Asia: With special reference to India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. A paper presented in World Congress 2014, Montreal, Canada.
  • Siddique, R. (2005). Modelling gender dimensions of the impact of economic reforms on time allocation among market, household, and leisure activities in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 44(4), 615–639.
  • Sinha, D., Tiwar, D. K., Bhattacharya, R., & Kattumuri, R. (2016). Public services, social relations, politics, and gender: Tales from a North Indian Village. In P. J. Himanshu & G. Rodgers (Eds.), The changing village India: Insights from longitudinal research (pp. 401–436). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Sudha, S., Khanan, S. R., Irdudaya, S., & Rana, S. (2007). Vulnerable daughters in modernizing society. From son preference to daughter discrimination in Rural South India. In I. Attane & C. Guilmoto (Eds.), Watering the neighbours garden: The growing demographic female deficit in Asia (pp. 267–294). Paris: Committee for International Cooperation in National Research in Demography.
  • Thompson, A. (2003). Caring in context: Four feminist theories on gender and education. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(1), 9–65.
  • Wirth, L. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling. Women in Management. Geneva: International Labour Office. 39.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Zafar, S., Batool, Z., & Bano, S. (2005). Female participation in decision making process in family matters in district Faisalabad-Pakistan. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences, 1(3), 285–287.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.