Mary Wollstonecraft’s divergent attitudes towards trust

References

• Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, E. (1757/2015). A philosophical enquiry. In P. Guyer (Ed.), A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful (pp. 1–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, M.A.R. (2005). A history of literary criticism and theory - From Plato to the present. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. (2007). Historien om K. E. Løgstrup [The story about K. E. Løgstrup] (2nd ed.). Copenhagen: Forlaget Anis.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (1993). Radical sensibility – literature and ideas in the 1790s. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2002). Mary Wollstonecraft’s vindications and their political tradition. In C. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 42–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (1956/2007). The ethical demand. T. I. Jensen & G. Puckering, Trans.. In H. Fink, & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), The ethical demand (1–264). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (1968/2007). The Sovereign expressions of life [excerpt from Controverting Kierkegaard]. S. Dew & H. Flegal, Trans.. In K. v. K. N (Ed.), Beyond the ethical demand (49–82). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinick, D. (2007). Sublime heroism and the wrongs of woman : Passion, reason, agency. European Romantic Review, 18(1), 1-27.
   Google Scholar
• Markley, A. A. (2009). Conversion and reform in the British novel in the 1790s – A revolution of opinions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Niknam, A. T. 2017. Risking (dis)trust: Intimacy and the fragility of trust in Mary Wollstonecraft’s ‘Maria’. Spheres - ENGEROM, KU, Retrived from https://spheresjournal.com/2017/10/05/risking-distrust-intimacy-and-the-fragility-of-trust-in-mary-wollstonecrafts-maria-by-arman-teymouri-niknam-2/
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, J. (2007). Feminizing the enlightenment: The problem of sensibility. In M. Fitzpatrick, P. Jones, C. Knellwolf, & I. McCalman (Eds.), The enlightenment world (pp. 253–271). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. (2017). ‘Trust is basic’ – Løgstrup on the priority of trust. In P. Faulkner & T. Simpson (Eds.), The philosophy of trust (pp. 272–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2003). Mary Wollstonecraft and the feminist imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. (1980). Reason and sensibility in Mary Wollstonecraft’s The wrongs of woman. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 5(3), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaselli, S. (2016). Reflections on inequality, respect, and love in the political writings of Mary Wollstonecraft. In S. Bergès & A. Coffee (Eds.), The social and political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 14–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann-Margalit, E. (2004). Trust, distrust, and in between. In R. Hardin (Ed.), Distrust (pp. 60–82). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1790/1993). A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In J. Todd (Ed.), A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (pp. 1–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/1993). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In J. Todd (Ed.), A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (pp. 63–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1796/2009). Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. In T. Brekke & J. Mee (Eds.), Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark (pp. 1–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1798/2007). The wrongs of woman; or Maria. In G. Kelly (Ed.), Mary and the wrongs of woman (pp. 63–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, N. (1999). Wollstonecraft, Rousseau and the revision of romantic subjectivity. Studies in Romanticism, 38(4), 537–557. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25601415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar