References
- Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, islam, modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Bailey, C. (1997). Making waves and drawing lines: The politics of defining the vicissitudes of feminism. Hypatia, 12(3), 17–28.
- Beattie, T. (2005). Religious identity and the ethics of representation: The study of religion and gender in the secular academy. In U. King & T. Beattie (Eds.), Gender, religion, and diversity: Cross-cultural perspectives. London: Continuum
- Braidotti, R. (2008). In spite of the times: The post-secular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 1–24.
- Browne, V. (2013). Backlash, repetition, untimeliness: The temporal dynamics of feminist politics. Hypatia, 28(4), 905–920.
- Browne, V. (2014). Feminism, time and nonlinear history. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 1–23.
- Castelli, E. (2001). Women, gender, religion: Troubling categories and transforming knowledge. In N. Castelli (Ed.), Women, gender, religion: A reader (pp. 3–25). York: Palgrave/St. Martin’s Press.
- Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton. NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Dussel, E. (1995). The invention of the Americas: Eclipse of ‘the other’ and the myth of modernity. (M. D. Barber, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
- Firestone, S. (1971). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Jonathan Cape.
- Fleissner, J. (2002). Is feminism a historicism? Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 21(1), 45–66.
- Freeman, E. (2000). Packing history, count(er)ing generations. New Literary History, 31(4), 727–744.
- Friedman, S. S. (1995). Making history: Reflections on feminism, narrative and desire. In D. Elam & R. Wiegman (Eds.), Feminism beside itself (pp. 11–55). New York and London: Routledge.
- Graham, E. L. (2012). What’s missing? Gender, reason and the post-secular. Political Theology, 13(2), 233–245.
- Greer, G. (1970). The female eunuch. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
- Hemmings, C. (2005). Telling feminist stories. Feminist Theory, 6(2), 115–139.
- Hemmings, C. (2011). Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
- Herbert, D. (2003). Religion and civil society: Rethinking public religion in the contemporary world. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Hesford, V. (2013). Feeling women’s liberation. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
- Hewitt, N. A. (ed.). (2010). No permanent waves: Recasting histories of U.S. feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In J. Schmidt (Ed.), What is enlightenment? eighteenth-century answers and twentieth- century questions (pp. 58–65). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kaplan, C. (2002). Mary Wollstonecraft’s receptions and legacies. In C. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 246–271). Cambridge University Press.
- Laird, H. (ed.). (2002). Feminism and time. Special issue of Tulsa studies in women’s literature (Vol. 21, pp. 1), University of Tulsa.
- Llewellyn, D. (2015). Reading, feminism and spirituality: Troubling the waves. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Mann, R. (2011). Theorizing ‘What could have been’: Black feminism, historical memory, and the politics of reclamation. Women’s Studies, 40(5), 575–599.
- Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions: Or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- McCutcheon, R. (2003). Manufacturing religion: The discourse on Sui Generis religion and the politics of Nostalgia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.
- Reilly, N. (2011). Rethinking the interplay of feminism and secularism in a neo-secular age. Feminist Review, 97, 5–31.
- Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
- Schmidt, J. (ed.). (1996). What is enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
- Scott, J. (2007). The politics of the veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Sorkin, D. (2008). The religious enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Taylor, B. (2003). Mary Wollstonecraft and the feminist imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Thompson, E. P. (1974, September 19). 'Solitary Walker’ (review of Claire Tomalin, the life and death of Mary Wollstonecraft (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson 1974). New Society.
- Tims, M. (1976). Mary Wollstonecraft: A social pioneer. London: Millington.
- Wiegman, R. (2000). Feminism’s apocalyptic futures. New Literary History, 31(4), 805–825.
- Withers, D.-M. (2015). Feminism, digital culture and the politics of transmission. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Wollstonecraft, M. (1993). A Vindication of the Rights of Men, and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, an historical and moral view of the origin and progress of the French Revolution. J. Todd (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wollstonecraft, M. (2009). Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. T. Brekke & J. Mee (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yeo, E. J. (1997). Introduction. In Yeo (Ed.), Mary Wollstonecraft and 200 Years of Feminisms. New York: New York University Press.