‘Hey man, how’s u?’: masculine speech and straight-acting gay men online

References

• Albury, K., & Byron, P. (2016). Safe on my phone? Same-sex attracted young people’s negotiations of intimacy, visibility, and risk on digital hook-up apps. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood, F. (2009). deepthroatfucker’ and ‘Discerning Adonis’: Men and cybersex. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(3), 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2002). Polari – The lost language of gay men. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2019). Fabulosa! The story of Polari, Britain’s secret gay language. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B. (2001). ‘Male gossip and language play in the letters of men’s lifestyle magazines’. Journal of Popular Culture, 34(4), 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benwell, B. (2003). ‘Ambiguous masculinities: Heroism and anti-heroism in the men’s lifestyle magazine’. The Sociological Review, 51(1), 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B. (2005). Lucky this is anonymous. Ethnographies of reception in men’s magazines: A ‘textual culture’ approach. Discourse & Society, 16(2), 147–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgeson, K., & Valeri, R. (2015). Gay skinheads: Negotiating a gay identity in a culture of traditional masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 23(1), 44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In S. Johnson & U. H. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and embodied identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world, 1890-1940. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, J. (2006). “Everyday joe” versus “pissy, bitchy, queens”: Gay masculinity on straightacting.com. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 14(2), 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N. (2011). The sociolinguistics of style. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 138–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darsey, J. (1981). “Gayspeak”: A response. In J. Chesebro (Ed.), Gayspeak: Gay male & lesbian communication (pp. 58–67). New York: Pilgrim Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easthope, A. (1990). What a man’s gotta do: The masculine myth in popular culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhaus, E., & Ben-Hador, B. (2019). Gossip and gender differences: A content analysis approach. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2006). Cultures of Masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, S. (2010). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: The rhetorical strategy of “Straight-Acting” among gay men. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38(3), 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (1999). ‘Lads, lasses and (new) labour: 14-16 year old students’ responses to ‘laddish behaviour and boys’ underachievement debate’. British Journal of Education, 20, 353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 16(4), 347–365.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, D. (2012). How to be gay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (1981). Gayspeak. In J. Chesebro (Ed.), Gayspeak: Gay male & lesbian communication (pp. 45–57). New York: Pilgrim Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennen, P. (2008). Fairies, bears, and leathermen: Men in community queering the masculine. Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesling, S. (2004). Dude. American Speech, 79(3), 281–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesling, S. (2005). Homosocial desire in men’s talk: Balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society, 34(5), 695–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. (2011). Language, sexuality and place: The view from cyberspace. Gender and Language, 5(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotthoff, H. (2005). Gender and humor: The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(1), 4–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1973). ’Language and women’s place’. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. (1998). Gay macho: The life and death of the homosexual clone. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levon, E. (2007). Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society, 36(4), 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levon, E. (2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society, 43(5), 539–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., Rivière, C. A., & Morel, J. (2016). Grindr casual hook-ups as interactional achievements. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2540–2558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, B. (2016). Producing sexual cultures and pseudonymous publics with digital networks. In R. A. Lind (Ed.), Race and gender in electronic media: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 231–246). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnes, J. (1998). End of masculinity: The confusion of sexual genesis and sexual difference in modern society. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet. New York: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J., & Schaffner, S. (2011). Football, it’s a man’s game: Insult and gendered discourse in the gender bowl. Discourse and Society, 22(5), 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes, D., & Bollens, J. (2000). Learning on the job: Metaphors of choreography and the practice of sex in sex-on-premises venues. Venereology, 13(1), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (2015). ‘“Dude, where’s your face?” Self-presentation, self-description, and partner preferences on a social networking application for men who have sex with men: A content analysis’. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 637–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (2018). Textually presenting masculinity and the body on mobile dating apps for men who have sex with men. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2016). “Masculine guys only”: The effects of femmephobic mobile dating application profiles on partner selection for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 176–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., & Babel, M. (2007). Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 416–449.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, E. (1972). Mother camp: Female impersonators in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, K. (2018). Moving beyond ideas of laddism: Conceptualising ‘mischievous masculinities’ as a new way of understanding everyday sexism and gender relations. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodin, N., Carballo-Diéguez, A., & Leal, I. (2014). Sexual use of the internet: Perceived impact on MSM’s views of self and others. New Media & Society, 16(5), 719–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podesva, R. (2007). Phonotation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(4), 478–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, K. (2014). Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: Online hook-up devices in gay life. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 17(4), 496–511.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J., & Richaerd, D. V. (2016). “There’s too many gay categories now”: Discursive constructions of gay masculinity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(4), 321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, T. (2015). Becoming fungible: Queer intimacies in social media. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(2), 55–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., Huemmer, J., & Blumell, L. (2016). Mobile masculinities: An investigation of networked masculinities in gay dating apps. Masculinities and Social Change, 5(3), 241–267.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (2005). Typing, Doing, and Being: Sexuality and the Internet. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 342–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Y. (2014). Locating the “Scruff guy”: Theorizing body and space in gay geosocial media. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2113–2133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarson, C. 2020. Masc4Masc: Masculinity, gay men, and the cultures of online cruising [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Birmingham City University.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (2008). Dude-sex: White masculinities and ‘authentic’ heterosexuality among dudes who have sex with dudes. Sexualities, 11(4), 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and masculinities. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar