18,399
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Only sluts love sexting: youth, sexual norms and non-consensual sharing of digital sexual images

ORCID Icon &
Pages 79-90 | Received 30 Apr 2020, Accepted 19 Jul 2020, Published online: 06 Aug 2020

References

  • Albury, K. (2015). Selfies, sexts, and sneaky hats: Young people’s understandings of gendered practices of self-representation. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1734–1745.
  • Angelides, S. (2013). ‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’: The affective politics of teenage sexting. Sexualities, 16(5–6), 665–689.
  • Bailey, J., & Hanna, M. (2011). The gendered dimensions of sexting: Assessing the applicability of Canada’s child pornography provision. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(2), 405–441.
  • Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 19(4), 835–863.
  • Burns, A. (2015). Self(ie)-discipline: Social regulation as enacted through the discussion of photographic practice. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1716–1733.
  • Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Hallford, D. J. (2019). The dark side of sexting - Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 266–272.
  • Crofts, T., Lee, M., McGovern, A., & Milivojevic, S. (2015). Sexting and young people. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • de Graaf, H., van den Borne, M., Nikkelen, S., Twisk, D., & Meijer, S. (2017). Seks onder je 25e: Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2017. Delft: Eburon.
  • DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2016). Thinking sociologically about image-based sexual abuse: The contribution of male peer support theory. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(4), 1–8.
  • Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dobson, A. S. (2019). The things you didn’t do’: Gender, slut-shaming, and the need to address sexual harassment in narrative resources responding to sexting and cyberbullying. In H. Vandebosch & L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 147–160). Cham: Springer.
  • Dobson, A. S., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of Tagged and Exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21.
  • Döring, N. M. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology, 8(1), 1.
  • Fox, N. J. (2008). Induction. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 430–431). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Gatti, J. (2009). A thin line: Digital abuse study [Report]. http://www.athinline.org/MTV-AP_Digital_Abuse_Study_Full.pdf
  • Giraldi, A., & Monk-Turner, E. (2017). Perception of rape culture on a college campus: A look at social media posts. Women's Studies International Forum, 62, 116–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.05.001
  • Handyside, S., & Ringrose, J. (2017). Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and affect. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 347–360.
  • Hasinoff, A. A., & Shepherd, T. (2014). Sexting in context: Privacy norms and expectations. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2932–2955.
  • Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2016). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 19(2), 195–208.
  • Karaian, L. (2014). Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 282–299.
  • Krebbekx, W. (2018). Making sex, moving difference: An ethnography of sexuality and diversity in Dutch schools. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Lee, M., & Crofts, T. (2015). Gender, pressure, coercion and pleasure: Untangling motivations for sexting between young people. British Journal of Criminology, 55(3), 454–473.
  • Lewis, J., & Knijn, T. (2002). The politics of sex education policy in England and Wales and The Netherlands since the 1980s. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 669–694.
  • Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t … if you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386.
  • Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327–335.
  • Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(5), 459–483.
  • McGlynn, C., Rackley, E., & Houghton, R. (2017). Beyond ‘revenge porn’: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 25(1), 25–46.
  • McGovern, A., & Lee, M. (2018). A sexting ‘panic’? What we learn from media coverage of sexting incidents. In M. Walrave, J. van Ouytsel, & K. Ponnet (Eds.), Sexting: Motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation (pp. 99–118). Nottingham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: SAGE.
  • Naezer, M., & van Oosterhout, L. (2019). Sharing is caring? Jongeren, sexting en de ongewenste verspreiding van sexy beeldmateriaal. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid.
  • Naezer, M. (2018a). Sexting: Een beter verhaal. In M. A. Lieskamp & W. Baardemans (Eds.), #ShameOver: Ongewenste sexting (pp. 18–25). Roermond: Bureau Jeugdzorg Limburg.
  • Naezer, M. (2018b). Sexy adventures: An ethnography of youth, sexuality and social media. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
  • Naezer, M. (2020). Sexy selves: Girls, selfies and the performance of intersectional identities. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(1), 41–56.
  • Ravn, S., Coffey, J., & Roberts, S. (2019). The currency of images: Risk, value and gendered power dynamics in young men’s accounts of sexting. Feminist Media Studies, 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1642229
  • Renold, E., Ringrose, J., & Egan, R. D. (2015). Children, sexuality and sexualization. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ricciardelli, R., & Adorjan, M. (2019). ‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if a guy’s photo gets sent around’: Gender, sexting, and the teenage years. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(5), 563–577.
  • Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). Boobs, back-off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens’ sexting images. Continuum, 29(2), 205–217.
  • Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.
  • Ringrose, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Regulating the abject. Feminist Media Studies, 8(3), 227–246.
  • Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media and Society, 18(11), 2723–2739.
  • Salter, M., Crofts, T., & Lee, M. (2013). Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(3), 301–316.
  • Schalet, A. T. (2011). Not under my roof: Parents, teens, and the culture of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Scholte, R., Nelen, W., Wit, W. D., & Kroes, G. (2016). Veiligheidsmonitor: Sociale veiligheid in en rond scholen. Nijmegen: Praktikon.
  • Setty, E. (2019). ‘Confident’ and ‘hot’ or ‘desperate’ and ‘cowardly’? Meanings of young men’s sexting practices in youth sexting culture. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(5), 561-577.
  • Setty, E. (2019b). Meanings of bodily and sexual expression in youth sexting culture: Young women’s negotiation of gendered risks and harms. Sex Roles, 80(9–10), 586–606.
  • Setty, E. (2019c). A rights-based approach to youth sexting: Challenging risk, shame, and the denial of rights to bodily and sexual expression within youth digital sexual culture. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(4), 298–311.
  • Strohmaier, H., Murphy, M., & DeMatteo, D. (2014). Youth sexting: Prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 245–255.
  • Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2018). Sexting scripts in adolescent relationships: Is sexting becoming the norm? New Media & Society, 20(10), 3836–3857.
  • Waling, A., & Pym, T. (2019). ‘C’mon, no one wants a dick pic’: Exploring the cultural framings of the ‘Dick Pic’ in contemporary online publics. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 70–85.
  • Walker, K., & Sleath, E. (2017). A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 9–24.
  • Walker, K., Sleath, E., Hatcher, R. M., Hine, B., & Crookes, R. L. (2019). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 088626051985341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853414
  • Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(6), 697–701.
  • Weaver, H., Smith, G., & Kippax, S. (2005). School‐based sex education policies and indicators of sexual health among young people: A comparison of the Netherlands, France, Australia and the United States. Sex Education, 5(2), 171–188.