733
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Negotiating same-sex partnership in a ‘tolerant’ state

&
Pages 512-524 | Received 09 Jun 2020, Accepted 09 May 2021, Published online: 25 May 2021

References

  • Altman, D. ([1971] 1993). Homosexual: Oppression and liberation. New York & London: NYU Press.
  • Association for the Promotion of LGBT Understanding. (n.d.). What is the law for the promotion of LGBT understanding? Retrieved May 31, 2020, from http://lgbtrikai.net/zoshinho/index.html
  • Befu, H. (2001). Premises, models and ideologies. In H. Befu (Ed.), Hegemony of homogeneity: An anthropological analysis of nihonjinron (pp. 66–85). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
  • Brainer, A. (2019). Queer kinship and family change in Taiwan. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Brake, E. (2012). Minimizing marriage: Marriage, morality, and the law. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Butler, J. (2002). Is kinship always heterosexual? Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13(1), 14–44.
  • Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
  • Croce, M. (2018). Desiring what the law desires: A semiotic view on the normalization of homosexual sexuality. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 14(3), 401–419.
  • Dahl, U. (2017). Becoming fertile in the land of organic milk: Lesbian and queer reproductions of femininity and motherhood in Sweden. Sexualities. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717718509
  • Duggan, L. (2002). The new heteronormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Eng, D. L. (2010). The feeling of kinship: Queer liberalism and the racialization of intimacy. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. [eBook edition] https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/1446/The-Feeling-of-KinshipQueer-Liberalism-and-the
  • Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love & eroticism in modern societies. Stanford: Stanford University.
  • Horie, Y. (2010). 同性間の「婚姻」に関する批判的考察―日本の社会制度の文脈から. [A critical analysis of same-sex ‘marriage’: An investigation of the context of the social system of Japan]. 社会システム研究, 21,37 - 57.
  • Horton, B. A. (2017). What’s so ‘queer’ about coming out? Silent queers and theorizing kinship agonistically in Mumbai. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717718506.
  • Hu, Y.-Y. (2017). Mainstreaming female masculinity, signifying lesbian visibility: The rise of the zhongxing phenomenon in transnational Taiwan. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717701690.
  • Hull, K. E. (2006). Same-sex marriage: The cultural politics of love and law. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iketomi, H. (2017). 長谷川健・渋谷区長が熱く語る 誰も街づくりに関わるべき必然 [The necessity of everyone’s involvement in town-making, according to Shibuya Mayor Hasebe Ken]. Oriijin, 40–42.
  • Ishikawa, A. (2016, November 18). Changes and stability one year after obtaining same-sex partnership certificate. Imidas. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from https://imidas.jp/jijikaitai/l-40-229-16-11-g516
  • Iwabuchi, K. (2013). De-westernisation, inter-Asian referencing and beyond. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17, 44–57.
  • E. M. A., Japan (n.d.) 同性婚 Q & A [Q & A on same-sex marriage]. Retrieved January 9, 2020, from. http://emajapan.org/promssm/ssmqaa
  • Kamano, S., Kamiya, Y., Sugiura, I., & Taniguchi, H. (2018). Family and partnership: Experiences of and ideas on same-sex partnership certificate in Shibuya. Paper presented at the XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.
  • Kazama, T. (2020). Conditional inclusion: Sexual minorities, tolerance and nationalism. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 29, 39–51.
  • Khor, D. (2010). The foreign gaze? A critical look at claims about same-sex sexuality in Japan in the english language literature. Gender and Sexuality: Journal of Center for Gender Studies, 5, 46–59.
  • Khor, D. (2020). Framing same-sex marriage in Japan. GIS Journal: The Hosei Journal of Global and Interdisciplinary Studies, 6, 29–41.
  • Khor, D., Tang, D., & Kamano, S. (2020). Global norms, state regulations and local activism: Marriage equality and SOGI rights in Japan and Hong Kong. In M. J. Bosnia, S. M. McEvoy, & M. Rahman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global LGBT politics (pp. 283–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Klessy, C. (2007). On the road to equality? Gender, sexuality and race in sociological meta-narratives on transformation of intimacy. In N. Rumens & A. Cervantes-Carson (Eds.), Sexual politics of desire and belonging (pp. 59–80). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi B.V.
  • Kong, T. S. K. (2019). Transnational queer sociological analysis of sexual identity and civic-political activism in Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China. The British Journal of Sociology. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12697.
  • Lasio, D., & Serri, F. (2017). The Italian public debate on same-sex civil unions and gay and lesbian parenting. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717713386.
  • Liberal Democratic Party. (2008). 日本国憲法改正草案 [Draft of amendment of the Japanese Constitution]. Retrieved January 9, 2020, from http://constitution.jimin.jp/document/draft/
  • Liberal Democratic Party Policy Research Council. (2016). 性的指向・性同一性 (性認知) の多様性って?自民党の考え方 [The liberal Democratic Party’s thoughts on the diversity of sexual orientation and sexual identity]. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from https://www.jimin.jp/news/policy/132489.html.
  • Marriage for All, Japan. (n.d.). Retrieved January 9, 2020, from http://marriageforall.jp/en/
  • Martin, F., Jackson, P. A., McLelland, M., & Audrey, Y. (Eds.). (2008). AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking genders and sexualities. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Puar, J. K. ([2007] 2017). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. [eBook edition] https://www.dukeupress.edu/Assets/PubMaterials/978-0-8223-7150-2_601.pdf
  • Richardson, D. (1998). Sexuality and citizenship. Sociology, 32, 83–100.
  • Robertson, J. (2007). Dying to tell: Sexuality and suicide in Imperial Japan. In E. Blackwood, S. E. Wieringa, & A. Bhaiya (Eds.), Women’s sexualities and masculinities in a globalizing Asia (pp. 217–242). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Scott, J., & Theron, L. (2017). The promise of heteronormativity: Marriage as a strategy for respectability in South Africa. Sexualities. Advanced online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717713384.
  • Sugita, M. (2018). LGBT支援の度が過ぎる[There is too much support for LGBT]. 新潮 45, 57–62.
  • Sugiura, H. (2013). 自民党憲法改正草案/現憲法対比 [LDP’s constitutional amendment draft: Comparison with current constitution]. Retrieved January 9, 2020 from http://www.azusawa.jp/topics/topics-20130413.html
  • Tang, D., Khor, D., & Chen, Y.-C. (2020). Legal recognition of same-sex partnership: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan and Japan. Sociological Review, 68(1), 184–208.
  • Taniguchi, H. (2013). Japan’s 2003 gender identity disorder act: The sex reassignment surgery, no marriage, and no child requirements as perpetuations of gender norms in Japan. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 14(2), 108–117.
  • The Constitution of Japan. (n.d.) https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
  • The Japanese Federation of Bar Association. (2019). 同性の当事者による婚姻に関する意見書 [Written opinion on marriage between parties of the same sex]. Retrieved January 9, 2020 from https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/library/ja/opinion/report/data/2019/opinion_190718_2.pdf
  • White, L. (2019). Gender and the koseki in contemporary Japan. New York: Routledge.
  • Yarbrough, M. W. (2017). Something old, something new: Historicizing same-sex marriage within ongoing struggles over African marriage in South Africa. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717718507.
  • Yue, A. (2017). Trans-Singapore: Queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 18(1), 10–24.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.