5,048
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gender back on the agenda in higher education: perspectives of academic staff in a contemporary UK case study

, , &
Pages 101-113 | Received 18 Nov 2020, Accepted 28 Jun 2021, Published online: 21 Jul 2021

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke University Press.
  • Ahrens, P., Celis, K., Childs, S., Engeli, I., Evans, E., & Mügge, L. (2018). Contemporary crises in European politics: Gender equality+ under threat. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(3), 301–306.
  • Aiston, S. J., & Kent, F. C. (2020). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716955
  • Arday, J. (2018). Dismantling power and privilege through reflexivity: Negotiating normative Whiteness, the Eurocentric curriculum and racial micro-aggressions within the Academy. Whiteness and Education, 3(2), 141–161.
  • Bhambra, G., Gebrial, D., & Nisancioglu, K. (Eds). (2018). Decolonising the University. Pluto Press.
  • Bhopal, K. (2020). Gender, ethnicity and career progression in UK higher education: A case study analysis. Research Papers in Education, 35, 6.
  • Bhopal, K., & Henderson, H. (2019). Competing inequalities: Gender versus race in higher education institutions in the UK. Educational Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1642305
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Brule, E. (2004). Going to Market: Neoliberalism and the Social Construction of the University Student as an Autonomous Consumer. In M. Reimer (Ed.), Inside the Corporate U: Women in the Academy Speak Out. Sumach Press, 255.
  • Burke, P. J., & Carolissen, R. (2018). Gender, post-truth populism and higher education pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 543–547.
  • Coate, K. (2018). Teaching gender: An inter-generational discussion. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(3), 485–488.
  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell University Press.
  • Corrêa, S. (2018). The globalisation of anti-gender campaigns. Transnational anti-gender movements in Europe and Latin America create unlikely alliances. International Politics and Society. [Accessed May 2021]. https://www.ips-journal.eu/topics/democracy-and-society/the-globalisation-of-anti-gender-campaigns–2761/
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  • Danvers, E., Hinton-Smith, T. & Webb, R. (2018). Power, pedagogy and the personal: Feminist ethics in facilitating a doctoral writing group. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 32–46.
  • Darder, A., & Baltodano, M. (2003). The critical pedagogy reader. Routledge.
  • David, M. (2014). Feminism, Gender and Universities: Politics, Passion and Pedagogies. Routledge.
  • David, M. (2016). A Feminist Manifesto for Education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • De Jong, S., Icaza, R., & Ritazibwa, O. (Eds). (2018). Decolonization and Feminisms in Global Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
  • Department for Education (2020). Plan your relationships, sex and health curriculum. UK Government. [Accessed January 2021]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908013/Relationships_Education__Relationships_and_Sex_Education__RSE__and_Health_Education.pdf
  • Department for Education (2021). Press Release: Landmark proposals to strengthen free speech at universities. UK Government. [Accessed June 2021]. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/landmark-proposals-to-strengthen-free-speech-at-universities
  • Drew, E., & Canavan, S. (2020). The Gender-Sensitive University: A Contradiction in Terms? Routledge.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case Study Research. Qualitative Enquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
  • Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of the neoliberal university. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). Routledge.
  • Gill, R. (2016). Post-postfeminism?: New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630.
  • Giroux, H. (2021). Race, Politics, and Pandemic Pedagogy: Education in a Time of Crisis. Bloomsbury.
  • Gore, J. (1992). What can we do for you? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54–73). Routledge.
  • Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521–535.
  • Hall, R. (2020). The Hopeless University: Intellectual Work at the End of the End of History. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 830–848.
  • Heffernan, T. (2021). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
  • Henderson, E. (2015). Gender Pedagogy: Teaching, Learning and Tracing Gender in Higher Education. London: Palgrave.
  • Henderson, E. (2018). Gender defender: Response to Kelly Coate’s review of Gender Pedagogy (Palgrave). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(3), 489–490.
  • Henderson, E. (2019). On being the ‘gender person’ in an academic department: Constructions, configurations and implications. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(6), 730–742.
  • Hinton-Smith,T., Marvell, R., Morris, C. and Brayson, K. (2021). It’s not something that we think about with regard to curriculum. Exploring gender and equality awareness in higher education curriculum and pedagogy. Exploring gender and equality awareness in higher education curriculum and pedagogy,Gender and Education. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1947472
  • Hinton-Smith, T., Danvers, E., & Jovanovic, T. (2018). Roma women’s higher education participation: Whose responsibility? Gender and Education, 30(7), 811–828.
  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
  • Hooks, B. (2015). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Routledge.
  • Jackson, C., & Sundaram, V. (2020). Lad Culture in Higher EducationSexism, Sexual Harassment and Violence. Routledge.
  • Kayali, L., & Walters, M. (2019). Prejudice and hate on university campuses: Repairing harms through student-led dialogue. Final evaluation report, University of Sussex. [Accessed June 2019]. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/84557
  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2020). Short-term, short-changed? A temporal perspective on the implications of academic casualisation for teaching in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1742681
  • Lugones, M. (2007). Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia, 22(1), 186–209.
  • Lynch, K. (2010). Carelessness: A hidden doxa of higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(1), 54–67.
  • MacKinnon, C. A. (2017a). Gender Literacy, in Butterfly Politics (pp. 217–224). Harvard University Press.
  • MacKinnon, C. A. (2017b). Mainstreaming Feminism in Legal Education. In Butterfly Politics (pp. 225–241). Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Maldonado-Torres, N., Vizcaino, R., Wallace, J., & Jeong Eun, A. W. (2017). Decolonising Philosophy (64–90). In G. Bhambra, D. Gebrial, & K. Nisancioglu (Eds.), Decolonising the University. Pluto Press.
  • McAlpine, L. (2010). Fixed-term researchers in the social sciences: Passionate investment, yet marginalizing experiences. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 229–240.
  • Méndez, X. (2015). Notes towards a decolonial feminist methodology: Revisiting the race/gender matrix. Trans-scripts, 5, 41–59.
  • Morley, L. (1998). All you need is love: Feminist pedagogy for empowerment and emotional labour in the academy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2(1), 15–27.
  • Morley, L. (2007). Sister-matic: Gender mainstreaming in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5–6), 607–620.
  • Morley, L. (2012). Researching Absences and Silences in Higher Education: Data for Democratisation. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 353–368.
  • Morley, L. (2013). The Rules of the Game: Women and the Leaderist Turn in Higher Education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131.
  • Morris, C., Kadiwal, L., Telling, K., Ashall, W., Kirby, J., & Mwale, S. (2021). (in press) Restorying imposter syndrome in the Early Career stage: Reflections, recognitions and resistance. In M. Addison, M. Breeze, & Y. Taylor (Eds.), (2021) Handbook of Imposter Syndrome in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Moss, D., & Richter, I. (2011). Changing times of feminism and higher education: From community to employability. Gender and Education, 23(2), 137–151.
  • Mügge, L., Montoya, C., Emejulu, A., & Weldon, L. (2018). Intersectionality and the politics of knowledge production. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1), 17–36.
  • Muhs, G., Niemann, Y.N., Gonzalez, C. & Harris, A. (eds.). (2012). Presumed Incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Utah State University Press.
  • Naffine, N. (2002). In praise of legal feminism. Legal Studies, 22(1), 71–101.
  • Nielsen, G. B. (2019). Radically democratising education? New student movements, equality and engagement in common, yet plural, worlds. Research in Education, 103(1), 85–100.
  • Pereira, M. (2012a). ‘Feminist theory is proper knowledge, but …’: The status of feminist scholarship in the academy. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 283–303.
  • Pereira, M. (2012b). Uncomfortable classrooms: Rethinking the role of student discomfort in feminist teaching. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(1), 128–135.
  • Pereira, M. (2016). Struggling within and beyond the performative university. Articulating Activism and Work in an “Academia without Walls” Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 100–110.
  • Phipps, A. (2017). Speaking up for what’s right: Politics, markets and violence in higher education. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 357–361.
  • Phipps, A. (2020). Me, not you: The problem with mainstream feminism. Manchester University Press.
  • Phipps, A., & Young, I. (2015). Neoliberalisation and ‘Lad Cultures’ in Higher Education. Sociology, 49(2), 305–322.
  • Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. Sage.
  • Read, B. (2018). Truth, masculinity and the anti-elitist backlash against the university in the age of Trump. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 593–605.
  • Read, B. & Leathwood, C. (2020). Casualised academic staff and the lecturer-student relationship: Shame, (Im)permanence and (Il)legitimacy,British Journal of Sociology of Education,41 (4), 539–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1748570
  • Reay, D. (2004). Cultural Capitalists and Academic Habitus: Classed and Gendered Labour in UK Higher Education. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27(1), 31–39.
  • Rees, T. (1998). Mainstreaming equality in the European Union. Routledge.
  • Sang, K., Powell, A., Finkel, R., & Richards, J. (2015). ‘Being an academic is not a 9–5 job ’: Long working hours and the ‘ideal worker’ in UK academia. Labour and Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 25(3), 235–249.
  • Smyth, J. (2017). The Toxic University: Zombie Leadership, Academic Rock Stars and Neoliberal Ideology. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tudor, A. (2021). Decolonizing Trans/Gender Studies: Teaching Gender, Race and Sexuality in Times of the Rise of the Global Right. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 8(2), (Forthcoming).
  • UCU (Universities and Colleges Union). (2019). Counting the costs of casualisation in higher education. UCU.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2002). Gender mainstreaming: Learning and development pack. UNDP.
  • Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 321–343.
  • Wallach Scott, J. (2008). Women’s studies on the edge. Duke University Press.
  • Weiner, G. (2006). Out of the ruins: Feminist pedagogy in recovery. In C. Skelton, B. Francis & L. Smulyan (eds.), The Sage Handook of Gender and Education. London: Sage Publications, 79-92.
  • Wright, T. (2016). Whatever happened to the F word in higher education? Journal of Gender Studies, 25(2), 215–227.