671
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perceiving an ambiguous situation as sexual harassment: the influence of observer and harasser gender

, &
Pages 33-47 | Received 20 May 2021, Accepted 24 Aug 2021, Published online: 29 Sep 2021

References

  • Aguilar, S. J., & Baek, C. (2020). Sexual harassment in academe is underreported, especially by students in the life and physical sciences. PloS One, 15(3), e0230312.
  • Avendaño, A. (2018). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Where were the unions? Labor Studies Journal, 43(4), 245–262.
  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.
  • Bendixen, M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2017). Advances in the understanding of same-sex and opposite-sex sexual harassment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 583–591.
  • Berthet, V., & Kantola, J. (2020). Gender, violence, and political institutions: Struggles over sexual harassment in the European Parliament. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. doi:10.1093/sp/jxaa015
  • Brown, C. S., & Stone, E. A. (2016). Gender stereotypes and discrimination: How sexism impacts development. In S. S. Horn, M. D. Ruck, & L. S. Liben (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 50. Equity and justice in developmental science: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 105–133). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.001
  • Carstensen, G. (2016). Sexual harassment reconsidered: The forgotten grey zone. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2017.1292314
  • Central Israeli Bureau of Statistics (2018). Table 1.3: Persons aged 20 and over who were victims of crime during the 12 months preceding the survey, by type of crime, age, and sex. Personal Safety Survey 2018, 101. Retrieved March 10, 2019, from https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/doclib/2019/1767_bitachon_ishi_2018/t01_03.pdf
  • Child Online Protection Bureau. (2019). Amendment 10 to the prevention of sexual harassment law (the video law). Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.gov.il/en/departments/legalInfo/10_amendment_to_prevention_of_sexual_harassment_law
  • Cleveland, J. N., & Kerst, M. E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An under-articulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 49–67.
  • Dahl, J., Vescio, T., & Weaver, K. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254.
  • Davis, T., & Wilson, J. M. (2016). Gender schema theory. Gender schema theory, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss655
  • Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2016). Predicting sexual harassment from hostile sexism and short-term mating orientation: Relative strength of predictors depends on situational priming of power versus sex. Violence Against Women, 24(2), 123–143.
  • Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2018). Predicting sexual harassment from hostile sexism and short-term mating orientation: Relative strength of predictors depends on situational priming of power versus sex. Violence Against Women, 24(2), 123–143.
  • Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275–298.
  • Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., & Valido, A. (2018). Associations among family violence, bullying, sexual harassment, and teen dating violence. In D. A. Wolfe & J. R. Temple (Eds.), Adolescent dating violence: Theory, research, and prevention (pp. 85–102). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811797-2.00004-9
  • Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 398–413.
  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775.
  • Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 55–59.
  • Goh, J. X., Bandt-Law, B., Cheek, N. N., Sinclair, S., & Kaiser, C. R. (2021). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/pspi0000260
  • Griffith, J. (2019). The sexual harassment–suicide connection in the US military: Contextual effects of hostile work environment and trusted unit leaders. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior, 49(1), 41–53.
  • Gutek, B. A. (2015). Sexual harassment. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1–1.
  • Gurung, A., Priyadarshini, S., & Margaret, B. E. (2016). Perception of sexual harassment among the undergraduate students. Manipal Journal of Nursing and Heath Sciences, 2(1), 46–51.
  • Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3–17). Manhattan, NY: Springer International.
  • Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment: Undermining the wellbeing of working women. In M. L. Connerley & J. Wu (Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 83–101). Manhattan, NY: Springer.
  • Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., Gustafson, A. M., Seabrook, R. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment against men: Examining the roles of feminist activism, sexuality, and organizational context. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 17–29.
  • IBM, IBM. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 24.0).
  • Johnson, P. A., Widnall, S. E., & Benya, F. F. (Eds.). (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994
  • Joseph, J. (2015). Sexual harassment in tertiary institutions: A comparative perspective. Temida, 18(2), 125–144.
  • Kamir, O. (2009). Harassed: Living with Israel’s sexual harassment law. Carmel & Hakibbutz Hameuchad (Hebrew).
  • Kamir, O. (2019). A dignitarian feminist jurisprudence with applications to rape, sexual harassment and honor codes. In R. West & C. G. Bowman (Eds.), Research handbook on feminist jurisprudence (pp. 303–321). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Kara, D., & Toygar, S. A. (2018). Gender differences in attitudes toward sexual harassment of health care employees: A Turkish case study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3574–3591.
  • Karami, A., Swan, S. C., White, C. N., & Ford, K. (2019). Hidden in plain sight for too long: Using text mining techniques to shine a light on workplace sexism and sexual harassment. Psychology of Violence. doi:10.1037/vio0000239
  • Knapp, D. E., DuBois, C. L., Hogue, M., Astakhova, M. N., & Faley, R. H. (2019). Russian workers’ experiences with and perceptions of sexual harassment severity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(13), 2049–2076.
  • Kudryavtsev, A. (2017). The availability heuristic and reversals following large stock price changes. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19(2), 159–176.
  • Law for the Prevention of Employment of Sex Offenders in Certain Institutions. (2011). Israel: Prevention of employment of sex offenders in specific institutions. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2011-06-20/israel-prevention-of-employment-of-sex-offenders-in-specific-institutions/)
  • Kunst, J. R., Bailey, A., Prendergast, C., & Gundersen, A. (2019). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the# metoo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology, 25(5), 818–843.
  • McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 1–17.
  • McDonald, P., Charlesworth, S., & Cerise, S. (2011, July). Below the “tip of the iceberg”: Extra-legal responses to workplace sexual harassment. In Women’s studies international forum (Vol. 34, pp. 278–289). Pergamon.
  • McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 625–647.
  • Mellgren, C., Andersson, M., & Ivert, A. K. (2018). “It happens all the time”: Women’s experiences and normalization of sexual harassment in public space. Women & Criminal Justice, 28(4), 262–281.
  • Mikorski, R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2017). Masculine norms, peer group, pornography, Facebook, and men’s sexual objectification of women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(4), 257–267.
  • Olivarius, A. (2017). Sexual harassment and assault in the academy. Medieval Feminist Forum: A Journal of Gender and Sexuality, 53(1), 11–36.
  • Pina, A., & Gannon, T. A. (2012). An overview of the literature on antecedents, perceptions and behavioral consequences of sexual harassment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 209–232.
  • Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law (1998). https://knesset.gov.il/review/data/eng/law/kns14_harassment_eng.pdf
  • Quick, J. C., & McFadyen, M. (2017). Sexual harassment: Have we made any progress? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 286–298.
  • Quintero Johnson, J. M., & Miller, B. (2016). When women “snap”: The use of mental illness to contextualize women’s acts of violence in contemporary popular media. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(2), 211–227.
  • Rothgerber, H., Kaufling, K., Incorvati, C., Andrew, C. B., & Farmer, A. (2020). Is a reasonable woman different from a reasonable person? Gender differences in perceived sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84(3–4), 208–220.
  • Rozmann, N., & Levy, I. (2019). Attribution of blame toward offenders: Victim and offender ethnicity, and observer ethnic and religious background. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260519885914. doi:10.1177/0886260519885914
  • Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7), 565–573.
  • Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). Engendering identity: Toward a clearer conceptualization of gender as a social identity. Sex Roles, 73(11), 474–480.
  • Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility as- signed for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 101–113.
  • Shechory-Bitton, M., & Zvi, L. (2020). Is it harassment? Perceptions of sexual harassment among lawyers and undergraduate students. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1793. Retrieved August 12, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01793
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Terrance, C., Logan, A., & Peters, D. (2004). Perceptions of peer sexual harassment among high school students. Sex Roles, 51(7/8), 479–490.
  • Traylor, L., & Richie, B. (2012). Female offenders and women in prison. In J. Petersilia & K. Reitz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections (pp. 561–583). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0023
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
  • Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113.
  • Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30.
  • Wiener, R. L., & Vardsveen, T. C. (2018). The objective prong in sexual harassment: What is the standard? Law and Human Behavior, 42(6), 545–557.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.