Young people’s digitally-networked bodies: the changing possibilities of what a gendered body can be, do and become online

References

• Abidin, C. (2016). Happy monthsary babe: Vernacular readings and practices of monthsaries among young couplings on social media. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCcsa Postgraduate Network, 9(6), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2016.96.483
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Albury, K. (2015). Selfies, sexts and sneaky hats: Young people’s understandings of gendered practices of self-representation. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 1734–1745.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. 2015.“Sexual assemblages: mobile phones/young people/school Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education“. 36(1), 120– 132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.846901
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. 2017. (Un)doing Youth sexualities: Mapping young people’s bodies and pleasures beyond ‘sex’. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2008). The body. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S. (2015). What about the boys? : Sexualisation, media and masculinities. (E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & D. Egan, Eds.). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S., Renold, E., Ringrose, J., and Jackson, C. 2018“‘More than boy, girl, male, female’: exploring young people’s views on gender diversity within and beyond school contexts“. Sex Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1439373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Kanai, A. (2021). Authenticity, uniqueness and talent: Gay male beauty influencers in post-queer, postfeminist Instagram beauty culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549421988966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Boobs and Barbie: Feminist posthuman perspectives on gender, bodies and practices. In J. Lynch, J. Rowlands, T. Gale, & A. Skourdoumbis (Eds.), Practice theory and education: Diffractive readings in professional practice. pp. 175–192. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. (2011). Transforming images: Screens, affect, futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2000). The men and the boys. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M. (2017). One health approach to prevent obesity in people and their pets. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 156(4), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2017.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejmanee, T. (2016). ‘Food porn’ as postfeminist play: Digital femininity and the female body on food blogs. Television & New Media, 17(5), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415615944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. translated from the French by. (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, (Eds.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demitrou, D. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017596718715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, S., & Coulter, N. (Eds.). (2018). Youth mediations and affective relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. The Sociological Review, 61(4), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francombe-Weber, J., Depper, A., & Rich, E. 2016. Why young women need to be given a louder voice in the obesity debate. The Conversation 22 November. Available at: http://theconversation.com/why-young-women-need-to-be-given-a-loudervoice-in-the-obesity-debate-68861 [Accessed 28 Feb 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2011). Bend it like Beckham: The challenges of reading gender and visual culture. In P. Reavey (Ed.), Visual methods in psychology: Using and interpreting images in qualitative research (pp. 29–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Girlguiding. (2021). Girls’ Attitude survey 2021: A snapshot of girls’ and young women’s lives. Girlguiding.
   Google Scholar
• Greenebaum, J., & Dexter, B. (2018). Vegan men and hybrid masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(6), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287064
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, J. (2019). Work that body: Male bodies in digital culture. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. 2016.“Sex, work, meat: the feminist politics of veganism“. Feminist Review, 114(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-016-0011-1
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2019). Veganism, sex and politics: Tales of danger and pleasure. HammerOn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Ringrose, J. (2015). Sexting, ratings and (Mis)recognition: Teen boys performing classed and racialised masculinities in digitally networked publics. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualisation. pp. 352- 367. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerpen, S. and Marston, K. (2019 Heteronormativity). SAGE Research Methods Foundations in Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. Williams (Eds.), . DOI: 10.4135/9781526421036767642.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2019). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data-human assemblages big data &. Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715619947
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2019). Vitalities and visceralities: Alternative body/food politics in new digital media. In M. Phillipov & K. Kirkwood (Eds.), Alternative food politics: From the margins to the mainstream. Routledge pp. 151- 168 .
   Google Scholar
• Maclure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164–183). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manago, A. (2013). Negotiating a sexy masculinity on social networking sites. Feminism & Psychology, 23(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353513487549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Application, reflection and ethics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, K. (2019). Researching LGBT+ youth intimacies and social media: The strengths and limitations of participant-led visual methods. Qualitative inquiry, 25(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2008). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, S. (2005). The cuteness of the avant-garde. Critical inquiry, 31(4), 811–847. https://doi.org/10.1086/444516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, S. (2015). Our aethetic categories: Zany, cute, interesting. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PETA. 2019. ‘Traditional’ masculinity is dead [Facebook]. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=790708347949569 [Accessed 28 Feb. 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages. Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2012). ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. philoSOPHIA, 2(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. (2013). Theorising learning and nature: Post-human possibilities and problems. Gender and Education, 25(1), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.831811
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., Holland, S., Ross, N., & Hillman, A. (2008). ‘Becoming Participant’: Problematizing ‘Informed Consent’ in Participatory Research with Young People in Care. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325008097139
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. (2015). Mud, mermaids and burnt wedding dresses: Mapping queer assemblages in teen girls’ talk on gender and sexual violence. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualization (pp. 239–255). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. and Ivinson, G. 2019.“Anticipating the more-than: working with prehension in artful interventions with young people in a post-industrial community“. Futures: the journal of policy, planning and future studies, 112, 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Pin-balling and boners: The posthuman phallus and intra-activist sexuality assemblages in secondary school. In L. Allen & M. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sexuality education (pp. 631–653). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. 2019. Jarring: Making Phematerialist Research Practices Matter. MAI: Feminism and Visual Culture. Retrieved from: https://maifeminism.com/introducing-phematerialism-feminist-posthuman-and-new-materialist-research-methodologies-in-education/ [Accessed 30 Jan]
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E., Allwood, R., Evans, J., & Davies, B. (2008). Education, disordered eating and obesity discourse: Fat fabrications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E., & Evans, J. (2013). Changing times, future bodies? The significance of health in young women’s imagined futures 1. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748680
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E., Monaghan, L., & Aphramor, L. (Eds.). (2011). Debating obesity: Critical perspectives. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S., Evans, A., & Mackiewicz, A. (2016). It’s just between girls: Negotiating the postfeminist gaze in women’s ‘looking talk’. Feminism & Psychology, 26(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353515626182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., & Coleman, R. (2013). Looking and desiring machines: A feminist deleuzian mapping of bodies and affects. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 125–144). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. and Harvey, L. 2015. Boobs, back off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens’ sexting images. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 29(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1022952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society for Public Health. (2017). #Statusofmind social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Royal Society for Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, T., Ellis, D., & Maddison, S. (Eds.). (2018). Affect and social media: Emotion, mediation, anxiety and contagion [E-book]. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Setty, E. (2019). ‘Confident’ and ‘hot’ or ‘desperate’ and ‘cowardly’? Meanings of young men’s sexting practices in youth sexting culture. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(5), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1635681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siibak, A. (2010). Constructing masculinity on a social networking site the case-study of visual self-presentations of young men on the profile images of SNS rate. YOUNG, 18(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001800403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B., & Woods, H. (2012). Reacting to reality television: Performance, audience and value. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbock, E. (2017). Catties and T-selfies. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 22(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2017.1322835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffoletti, K., & Thorpe, H. (2021). Bodies, gender and digital affect in fitspiration media feminist mediastudies. Feminist Media Studies, 21(5), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1713841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. (2008).““Chav mum chav scum” Class disgust in contemporary Britain“. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Paws, U. K. 2020. Pet influencers. Available at: https://www.urbanpawsuk.com/petinfluencers/[Accessed 28 Feb 2022]
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., & Jiminez, L. (2012). Gender, work and community after de-industrialisation: A psychosocial approach to affect. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M. (2016). ‘Placing young men’: The performance of young working-class masculinities in the South Wales Valleys. In D. Mannay (Ed.), Our changing land: Revisiting gender, class and identity in contemporary wales (pp. 88–111). University of Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2015). Multiple mutating masculinities: Of maps and men. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 20(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1017387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar