1,504
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Navigating visibility and risk: disabled young women’s self-presentation practices on social media

Pages 512-523 | Received 16 Jun 2022, Accepted 23 May 2023, Published online: 04 Jun 2023

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Bailey, M., & Mobley, I. A. (2019). Work in the intersections: A black feminist disability framework. Gender & Society, 33(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218801523
  • Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002772
  • Bitman, N. (2022). ”Authentic” digital inclusion? Dis/ability performances on social media by users with concealable communicative disabilities. New Media & Society, 4(2), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063183
  • Burch, L. (2018). You are a parasite on the productive classes: Online disablist hate speech in austere times. Disability & Society, 3(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1411250
  • Burch, L. (2021). Everyday hate and affective possibility. Disabled people’s negotiations of space, place and identity. International Journal of Disability and Social Justice, 1(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.13169/intljofdissocjus.1.1.0073
  • Christensen-Strynø, M. B., & Bruun Eriksen, C. (2020). Madeline Stuart as disability advocate and brand: Exploring the affective economies of social media. In D. Garrisi & J. Johanssen, Eds. Disability, media, and representations: Other bodies. Routledge (pp. 35–50). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469244-3
  • Cooper, H. (2016). Passing or trespassing? Unseen disability, containment and the politics of “feeling like a fraud” in a neoliberal bureaucracy. In R. Mallett, C. Ogden, & J. Slater (Eds.), Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane: Precarious Positions (pp. 120–143). Chester University Press.
  • Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media and self-representation. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dobson, A. S., & Kanai, A. (2019). From “can-do” girls to insecure and angry: Affective dissonances in young women’s post-recessional media. Feminist Media Studies, 19(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1546206
  • Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2019). Gendered visibility on social media: Navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4983–5002 https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11729/2821.
  • Dusenbery, M. (2018). Doing harm: The truth about how bad medicine and lazy science leave women dismissed, misdiagnosed, and sick. HarperOne (Harper Collins).
  • Furr, J. B., Carreiro, A., & McArthur, J. A. (2016). Strategic approaches to disability disclosure on social media. Disability & Society, 31(10), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1256272
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity 1990. Penguin Books.
  • Hale, C., Brough, J., Allam, A., Lydiard, S., Springfield, F., Fixter, A., Wright, N., Clutton, V., Bole, K. (2021) Submission to the department of health and social care’s inquiry into women’s health and wellbeing in England, Chronic Illness Inclusion, June, Available from https://chronicillnessinclusion.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CII.DHSC-Womens-Health-England-June-2021.pdf (Retrieved May 31, 2022).
  • Hamilton, A. (2020) Fake it off: Reddit’s r/Illnessfakers community and the politics of disbelief, Bitch Media, 23rd March. https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/illness-fakers-subreddit-politics-of-disbelief (Accessed March 9th, 2022).
  • Handyside, S., & Ringrose, J. (2017). Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and affect. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1280384
  • Harris, A. (2004). Future girls: Young women in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
  • Hendry, N. A. (2020). Young women’s mental illness and (in-)visible social media practices of control and emotional recognition. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 205630512096383. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120963832
  • Hill, S. (2017). Exploring disabled girls’ self-representation practices online. Girlhood Studies, 10(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2017.100209
  • Hill, S. (2023). (Not) being the ‘cool disabled person’: Queering / Cripping postfeminist girlhood on social media. In T. Sikka, G. Longstaff, & S. Walls, Eds. Disrupted Knowledge: Scholarship in a Time of Change, Brill (pp. 155–173). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004536418_010
  • Johansson, A. (2021). Fat, Black and napologetic: Body positive activism beyond white, neoliberal rights discourses. In E. Alm, L. Berg, M. Lundahl Hero, A. Johansson, P. Laskar, L. Martinsson, D. Mulinari, & C. Wasshede (Eds.), Pluralistic struggles in gender, sexuality and coloniality: Challenging Swedish exceptionalism (pp. 113–146). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47432-4
  • Kent, M. (2020). Social media and disability: It’s complicated. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, B. Haller, & R. Curtis (Eds.), The Routledge companion to disability and media (pp. 264–274). Routledge.
  • Marwick, A E., & boyd d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995
  • McCosker, A., & Gerrard, Y. (2021). Hashtagging depression on Instagram: Towards a more inclusive mental health research methodology. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1899–1919. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820921349
  • McLaughlin, J. (2017). The medical reshaping of disabled bodies as a response to stigma and a route to normality. Medical Humanities, 43, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-011065
  • Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001
  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. (2015). The Biopolitics of disability: Neoliberalism, ablenationalism and peripheral embodiment. University of Michigan Press.
  • Oliver, M. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Macmillan.
  • Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE.
  • Ryan, F. (2021) During Covid, to be “vulnerable” is to be told your life doesn’t matter, The Guardian, 24th June, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/24/covid-vulnerable-life-death-toll-old-disabled (Retrieved May 5th, 2022).
  • Sandahl, C. (2003). Queering the crip or cripping the queer? Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies, 9(1–2), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
  • Sarkar, T., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Hanebutt, R., & Cohen, M. (2021). Good morning, Twitter! What are you doing today to support the voice of people with #disability?”: Disability and digital organizing. Journal of Community Practice, 29(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2021.1982802
  • Schalk, S. (2022). Black disability politics. Duke University Press.
  • Sheppard, E. (2020). Performing normal but becoming crip: Living with chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.619
  • Siebers, T. (2004). Disability as masquerade. Literature and Medicine, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2004.0010
  • Sweet, K. S., LeBlanc, J. K., Stough, L. M., & Sweany, N. W. (2020). Community building and knowledge sharing by individuals with disabilities using social media. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12377
  • Tiidenberg, K. (2018). Selfies: Why we love (and hate) them. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787543577
  • Todd, A. (2018). Virtual (dis)orientations and the luminosity of disabled girlhood. Girlhood Studies, 11(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2018.110305
  • Tyler, I. (2018). Resituating Erving Goffman: From stigma power to black power. The Sociological Review Monographs, 66(4), 744–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118777450
  • Vickery, J. R., & Everbach, T. (2018). Mediating misogyny: Gender, technology, and harassment. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6.
  • Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097