653
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

“Bois of Isolation”: queering place, gender binaries and the ‘self’ through selfies in pandemic lockdown

&
Pages 524-540 | Received 22 Apr 2022, Accepted 31 May 2023, Published online: 11 Aug 2023

References

  • Archer, D., Iritani, B., Kimes, D. D., & Barrios, M. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.725
  • Askins, K. (2018). Feminist geographies and participatory action research: Co-producing narratives with people and place. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(9), 1277–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2018.1503159
  • Barker, M. J., & Iantaffi, A. (2019). Life isn’t binary: On being both, beyond, and in-between. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Blanchfield, C., & Lotfi-Jam, F. (2017). The Bedroom of things. Log, 41, 129–134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323727
  • Bonner-Thompson, C. (2017). ‘The meat market’: Production and regulation of masculinities on the grindr grid in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1611–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2017.1356270
  • Chatterjee, A. (2002). Portrait profiles and the notion of agency. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.2190/3WLF-AGTV-0AW7-R2CN
  • Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011
  • Cockayne, D. G., & Richardson, L. (2018). A queer theory of software studies: Software theories, queer studies. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(11), 1587–1594. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2017.1383365
  • Darr, C. R., Doss, E. F., Humphreys, L., & Humphreys, L. (2022). The fake one is the real one: Finstas, authenticity, and context collapse in teen friend groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac009
  • Darwin, H. (2017). Doing gender beyond the binary: A virtual ethnography. Symbolic Interaction, 40(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.316
  • de Larch, G. (2014). The visible queer: Portraiture and the reconstruction of gender identity. Agenda, 28(4), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2014.968408
  • Döring, N., Reif, A., & Poeschl, S. (2016). How gender-stereotypical are selfies? A content analysis and comparison with magazine adverts. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 955–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.001
  • Duguay, S. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer visibility through selfies: Comparing platform mediators Across Ruby Rose’s Instagram and vine presence. Social Media + Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641975
  • Ehlin, L. (2014). The subversive selfie: Redefining the mediated subject. Clothing Cultures, 2(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1386/cc.2.1.73_1
  • Felmlee, D., Inara Rodis, P., & Zhang, A. (2019). Sexist slurs: Reinforcing feminine stereotypes online. Sex Roles, 83(1–2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01095-z
  • Franzoi, S. L. (1995). The body-as-object versus the body-as-process: Gender differences and gender considerations. Sex Roles, 33(5–6), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01954577
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
  • Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. Harper Torchbooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16079-2
  • Grogan, S., Rothery, L., Cole, J., & Hall, M. (2018). Posting selfies and body image in young adult women: The selfie paradox. Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 15–36. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/618951
  • Hakim, J. (2019). Work that body: Male bodies in digital culture. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Jones, A. (1998). Body art performing the subject. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kang, M.-E. (1997). The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 979–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936350
  • Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/Space [electronic resource] : Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
  • Lehner, A. (2019). Trans self-imaging praxis, decolonizing photography, and the work of alok vaid-menon. Refract: An Open Access Visual Studies Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/r72145857
  • Leszczynski, A. (2019). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721
  • Liu, C. (2021). Exploring selfie practices and their geographies in the digital society. The Geographical Journal, 187(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12394
  • Luciano, D., & Chen, M. Y. (2015). Has the queer ever been human? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2843215
  • March, L. (2020). Queer and trans* geographies of liminality: A literature review. Progress in Human Geography, 45(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520913111
  • Matthews, P., Poyner, C., & Kjellgren, R. (2018). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer experiences of homelessness and identity: Insecurity and home(o)normativity. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(2), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1519341
  • Miles, S. (2018). Still getting it on online: Thirty years of queer male spaces brokered through digital technologies. Geography Compass, 12(11), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12407
  • Murray, D. C. (2015). Notes to self: The visual culture of selfies in the age of social media. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(6), 490–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1052967
  • Murray, D. C. (2021). On photographic photography’s multitudes in the age of online self-imaging. In J. Lewis & K. Parry (Eds.), Ubiquity (pp. 179–196). Leuven University Press.
  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284004
  • Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507085213
  • Pilkey, B., Scicluna, R. M., & Gorman-Murray, A. (2015). Alternative domesticities. Home Cultures, 12(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2015.1046294
  • Prieler, M., & Kohlbacher, F. (2017). Face-ism from an international perspective: gendered self-presentation in online dating sites across seven countries. Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0745-z
  • Richardson, L. (2021). Glitch feminism: A manifesto: By L. Russell, 2020, London, Verso, 178 pp., $14.95 (Paperback), ISBN, 978-1786632661 (Paperback). Gender, Place & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1981638
  • Rose, G. (2016). Cultural geography going viral. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(6), 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1124913
  • Russell, L. (2020). Glitch feminism: A manifesto. Penguin Random House.
  • Simon, S., & Hoyt, C. L. (2012). Exploring the effect of media images on women’s leadership self-perceptions and aspirations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212451176
  • Suitner, C., Maass, A., & Ronconi, L. (2016). From spatial to social asymmetry. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316676045
  • Tiidenberg, K. (2018). Selfies: Why we love (and hate) them. Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787543577
  • Vivienne, S. (2017). “I will not hate myself because you cannot accept me”: Problematizing empowerment and gender-diverse selfies. Popular Communication, 15(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1269906
  • Walker Rettberg, J. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476661
  • Wells, G., Horwitz, J., & Seetharaman, D. (2021). 2021 September 14. Facebook knows Instagram is toxic for teen girls, company documents show. The Wall Street Journal Retrieved 20 September 2021 from https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
  • Williams, A. A., & Marquez, B. A. (2015). The lonely selfie king: Selfies and the conspicuous prosumption of gender and race. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1775–1787. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3162
  • Zawisza, M. J. (2019). Advertising, gender and society: A psychological perspective (First ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144306