Queer Singaporean futures after 377a: establishing homonormativity as concrete labour

References

• 2019 Archive. (n.d.). IndigNationSG. Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://www.indignationsg.com/2019-archive
   Google Scholar
• Altman, D., & Symons, J. (2016). Queer wars. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, M. (2019). Queer temporalities: The past, present and future of ‘gay’ migrants from India in Singapore. Current Sociology, 67(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118792922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2000). The sexual citizen: Queer politics and beyond. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, S. (2011). Economics, performativity, and social reproduction in global development. Globalizations, 8(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2010.493014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (1997). The Queen of America goes to Washington City: Essays on sex and citizenship. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Merely cultural. Social Text, 52(53), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/466744
   Google Scholar
• Channel News Asia (Director). (2022, August 22). Singapore to repeal 377A: Lawrence Wong and Edwin Tong speak to CNA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct02hNXuv0Y&t=91s
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. (2000). Reading capital politically. AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism (pp. 175–194). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822383901-008
   Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., & Loftus, A. (2020). On “the concrete”: Labour, difference and method. Antipode, 52(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elson, D. (1979). Value the representation of labour in capitalism: Essays.
   Google Scholar
• Farjoun, E. D., Machover, M., & Zachariah, D. (2022). How labor powers the global economy: A labor theory of capitalism. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93321-0
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. (2021). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Penguin Book.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41(s1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2009). The reification of desire: Toward a Queer Marxism (NED-New ed.). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts5bg
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2015, October 31). Social reproduction, but not as we know it. Viewpoint Magazine. https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/social-reproduction-but-not-as-we-know-it/
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. (2020). The global LGBT workplace equality movement. In Companion to sexuality studies (pp. 445–463). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119315049.ch24
   Google Scholar
• Gore, E. (2022). Understanding queer oppression and resistance in the global economy: Towards a theoretical framework for political economy. New Political Economy, 27(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1952558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2022). Constituition of the Republic of Singapore (Amendement no 3) Bill, Parliament 77. https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=bill-607
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, S. (2016). The belly of the world: A note on Black Women’s labors. Souls, 18(1), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2016.1162596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, K. K. (2015). Dealing in desire: Asian ascendancy, western decline, and the hidden currencies of global sex work (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt13x1hcz
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2010). Cracks and the crisis of abstract labour. Antipode, 42(4), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (2015). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Feminist-Theory-From-Margin-to-Center/hooks/p/book/9781138821668
   Google Scholar
• Kotiswaran, P. (2011). Dangerous sex, invisible labor: Sex work and the Law in India. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7t170
   Google Scholar
• Laing, M., Pilcher, K., & Smith, N. (2015). Queer sex work. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761960
   Google Scholar
• Lamond, G. (2001). Coercion and the Nature of law. Legal Theory, 7(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325201071026
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675231
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L. (2022, August 21). National day rally 2022. https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/National-Day-Rally-2022-English
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.-H. (2016). LGBT rights versus asian values: undefined/re-constructing the universality of human rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 20(7), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1192537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I.-C., & Lin, W.-F. (2022). Us versus them: The debates on the legislation of same-sex marriage (1994 – 2015) in Taiwan. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1848148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, E.-B. (2005). Glocalqueering in New Asia: The politics of performing gay in Singapore. Theatre Journal, 57(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2005.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. F. (2004). Where love dares (not) speak its name: The expression of homosexuality in Singapore. Urban Studies, 41(9), 1759–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000243147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, V. (2022, August 22). Religious groups support government’s move to protect definition of marriage in constitution as it repeals 377A. Channel News Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/section-377a-repeal-gay-sex-marriage-constitution-religious-groups-reactions-2891396
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P. (2015). Queer Marxism in two Chinas. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P. (2023). The specter of materialism: Queer theory and Marxism in the age of the Beijing Consensus. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzini, D. (2018). Governmentality, subjectivity, and the neoliberal form of life. Journal for Cultural Research, 22(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2018.1461357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (2023). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into freud. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A critique of political economy, volume 1. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Maulod, A. (2021). Coming home to one’s self: Butch Muslim masculinities and negotiations of piety, sex, and parenthood in Singapore. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(7), 1106–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1888584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2020). Sexual and gender diversities: Implications for LGBTQ studies. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1528079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowlabocus, S. (2021). Interrogating homonormativity: Gay men, identity and everyday life. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87070-6
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. H. (2023). The political economy of heteronormativity. Review of Radical Political Economics, 55(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134211011269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, V., & Hiramoto, M. (2021). For family, for friends, for (true) love: Negotiating discourses of love within the LGBTQ community in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 10(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20009.hir
   Google Scholar
• Paul Tan, K., & Lee Jack Jin, G. (2007). Imagining the gay community in Singapore. Critical Asian Studies, 39(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710701339311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. V. (2005). How (the meaning of) gender matters in political economy. New Political Economy, 10(4), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prankumar, S. K., Aggleton, P., & Bryant, J. (2021). Belonging, citizenship and ambivalence among young gay, bisexual and queer Indian Singaporean men. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1773762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (1991). White paper on shared values.
   Google Scholar
• Prügl, E. (2015). Neoliberalising Feminism. New Political Economy, 20(4), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.951614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radics, G. B. (2013, December 15). Decolonizing Singapore’s sex laws: Tracing section 377a of Singapore’s penal code. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 45(1). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2484257
   Google Scholar
• Radics, G. B. (2019). #Ready4Repeal? Viewing s 377A of the Singaporean penal code through the lens of legal actors and artists. SSRN Scholarly Paper 3488568. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3488568
   Google Scholar
• Radics, G. B. (2024). Cultural wars and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) rights in Southeast Asia: ‘Asian values’, human rights, and the ‘homosexual turn’. Current Sociology, 00113921241241808. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921241241808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (1997). Spiritual and menial housework. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1282
   Google Scholar
• Rofel, L. (2007). Desiring China: Experiments in neoliberalism, sexuality, and public culture. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. (2012). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394068-006
   Google Scholar
• Saad Filho, A. (1997). Concrete and abstract labour in marx’s theory of value. Review of Political Economy, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259700000042
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, A. (1990). Abstract and concrete labour. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), Marxian economics (pp. 42–44). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20572-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, M., Farrugia, D., Coffey, J., Threadgold, S., Adkins, L., & Gill, R. (2022). Queer subjectivities in hospitality labor. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(5), 1511–1525. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J. (2020). Introduction. In N. J. Smith (Ed.), Capitalism’s sexual history. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530276.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity. Radical History Review, 2008(100), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2007-026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. (2022). Revolting Subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal britain. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. In The problem with work. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822394723
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2005). Who sets social policy in metropolis? Economic positioning and social reform in Singapore*. New Political Science, 27(3), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393140500220102
   Google Scholar
• Why Sponsor?. (2020). Red dot for pink dot. https://reddotforpinkdot.sg/benefits/
   Google Scholar
• Ye, S. (2021). ‘Paris’ and ‘scar’: Queer social reproduction, homonormative division of labour and HIV/AIDS economy in postsocialist China. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(12), 1778–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1873742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, G. (2000). Embodied political economy or an escape from disembodied knowledge. In G. Youngs (Ed.), Political economy, power and the body (pp. 11–30). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983904_2
   Google Scholar
• Yue, A. (2012). Introduction Queer Singapore: A Critical Introduction. In A. Yue & J. Zubillaga-Pow (Eds.), Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures. Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888139330.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Yue, A. (2017). Trans-Singapore: Some notes towards queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 18(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1273911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yulius, H., Tang, S., & Offord, B. (2018). The globalization of LGBT identity and same-sex marriage as a catalyst of neo-institutional values: Singapore and Indonesia in focus. In B. Winter, M. Forest, & R. Sénac (Eds.), Global perspectives on same-sex marriage: A neo-institutional approach (pp. 171–196). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_9
   Google Scholar