Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature

Bibliography

• Bartles, Charles K. “Getting Gerasimov Right.” Military Review 96, no. 1 (January/February 2016): 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Brister, Paul. “Revisiting the Gordian Knot: Strategic Considerations for Hybrid Warfare.” In Hybrid Warfare and Transnational Threats: Perspectives for an Era of Persistent Conflict, edited by Paul Brister, William H Natter, and Robert R Tomes, 49–59. New York: Council for Emerging National Security Affairs, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Allen. “Justifying Preventive War.” In Preemption, edited by Henry Shue and David Rodin, 126–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233137.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, Carl Von. On War. Translated and edited by Sir Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, Davi M. Hybrid Warfare: GAO Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Deep, Alex. “Hybrid War: Old Concept, New Techniques.” Small Wars Journal (March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Freier, Nathan P. Known Unknowns: Unconventional “Strategic Shocks” in Defense Strategy Development . Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2008.10.21236/ADA488045
   Google Scholar
• Freier, Nathan P. Strategic Competition and Resistance in the 21st Century: Irregular, Catastrophic, Traditional, and Hybrid Challenges in Context. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert M. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Bonnie. “Armed Clash in the South China Sea: Contingency Planning Memorandum No. 14.” Council of Foreign Relations, 2014, updated April 2015. Accessed May 2017. https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2012/04/CPA_contingencymemo_14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S. Recognizing and Understanding Revolutionary Change in Warfare: The Sovereignty of Context. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, Thomas X. “Modern Warfare Evolves into a Fourth Generation.” In Unrestricted Warfare Symposium: Proceedings on Strategy, Analysis, and Technology, edited by Ronald R. Luman, 65–88. Laurel, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 14–15 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank G. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank. “The Hybrid Character of Modern Conflict.” In Hybrid Warfare and Transnational Threats: Perspectives for an Era of Persistent Conflict, edited by Paul Brister, William H Natter and Robert R Tomes, 36–48. New York: Council for Emerging National Security Affairs, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank G. “Hybrid versus Compound War: The Janus Choice Defining Today’s Multifaceted Conflict.” Armed Forces Journal (October 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank. “Hybrid Warfare and Challenges.” Joint Forces Quarterly 52, no. 1 (2009): 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Michael. The Invention of Peace: Reflections on War and International Order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Andreas, and Guillaume Lasconjarias. “NATO’s Hybrid Flanks: Handling Unconventional Warfare in the South and East.” In NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats, edited by Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen. Rome: NATO Defence College, Forum Paper 24, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, Scott, and Scott Moreland. “The Islamic State is a Hybrid Threat: Why Does That Matter?” Small Wars Journal (December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Robert. “The Changing Character of War.” Unpublished lecture at the NATO Defence College, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Rob. Oil, Islam and Conflict: Central Asia Since 1945. London: Reaktion, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, George F. The Inauguration of Organized Political Warfare. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David. The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David. Out of the Mountains: The Coming Age of the Urban Guerrilla. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• de Landa, Mannual. War in an Age of Intelligent Machines. London: Zone, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lasconjaris, Guillaume, and Jeffrey A. Larsen, eds. NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats. Rome: NDC Forum Paper 24, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Quo, and Wang Xiangsui. Unrestricted Warfare. Panama City, FL: Pan American Publishing, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Luman, Robert R. “Introduction.” In Unrestricted Warfare Symposium: Proceedings on Strategy, Analysis, and Technology, edited by Ronald R. Luman. Laurel, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 14–15 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, Jack. “Strategy of Hybrid War.” In Hybrid Warfare and Transnational Threats: Perspectives for an Era of Persistent Conflict, edited by Paul Brister, William H Natter and Robert R Tomes, 70–82. New York: Council for Emerging National Security Affairs, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloh, Timothy, and Richard Johnson. “Hybrid Warfare.” JSOU Report 13–4 (August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, Roger. “Does Russia Have a Gerasimov Doctrine?” Parameters (2016): 97–105. Accessed May 2017. https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/issues/Spring_2016/12_McDermott.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McFate, Montgomery, and Andrea V. Jackson. “The Object Beyond War: Counterinsurgency and the Four Tools of Political Competition.” In Unrestricted Warfare Symposium: Proceedings on Strategy, Analysis, and Technology, edited by Ronald R. Luman, 143–178. Laurel, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 14–15 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mansoor, Peter R. “Hybrid Warfare in History.” In Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, edited by Williamson Murray and Peter R. Mansoor, 1–17. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. “Myths and Facts.” Accessed May 2017. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/myths-and-facts-2008-gaza-war-operation-cast-lead-chapter-24
   Google Scholar
• Moberg, Michael, James Mashiri, and Charly Salonius-Pasternak. “What if Russia Demands a Naval Base in Finland Or Invades a Swedish Island?” Suomen Kuvalethi, no. 9, February 27, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson, and Peter Mansoor, eds. Hybrid Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeth, Bill. “Future War and Chechnya: A Case for Hybrid Warfare.” Unpubld. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S., and Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. “The War of New Words: Why Military History Trumps Buzzwords.” Armed Forces Journal (2009). http://armedforcesjournal.com/essay-the-war-of-new-words/
   Google Scholar
• Schadlow, Nadia. “The Problem with Hybrid Warfare.” War on the Rocks, April 2015. Accessed April 2015. https://warontherocks.com/2015/04/the-problem-with-hybrid-warfare/
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul. “Spectrum of What?” Military Review (November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Shue, Henry. “What would a Justified Preventive Attack Look Like?” In Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, edited by Williamson Murray and Peter R Mansoor, 222–246. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Simon-Tov, David, and Yoram Schweitzer. “Israel against Hizbollah: Between Overt and Covert Warfare.” INSS Insight 668, March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• TRADOC G-2. “Operational Environments to 2028: The Strategic Environment for Unified Land Operations.” (August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Winnerstig, Mike. Tools of Destabilization: Russian Soft Power and Non-Military Influence in the Baltic States. Stockholm, Sweden: FOIR, 2014.
   Google Scholar