Bibliography
- Barnes, Paul. 2019. “Neophilia, Presentism, and Their Deleterious Consequences for Western Military Strategy - Modern War Institute.” Modern War Institute at West Point. Accessed June 9, 2020. https://mwi.usma.edu/neophilia-presentism-deleterious-consequences-western-military-strategy/
- Biscop, Sven. 2015. “Hybrid Hysteria - Policy Brief.” Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.
- Breedlove, Philip M. “Foreword.” In NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats, edited by Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen, xxi–xxv. Rome: NATO Defence College, 2015.
- Charap, Samuel. “The Ghost of Hybrid War.” Survival 57, no. 6 (2015): 51–58. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1116147.
- Coker, Christopher. Rebooting Clausewitz: ‘On War’ in the Twenty-First Centur. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
- Corbett, Julian. Some Principles of Maritime Strategy, ed. Eric Grove. London: Annapolis, 1988.
- Cox, Dan G., Thomas Bruscino, and Alex Ryan. “Why Hybrid Warfare Is Tactics Not Strategy: A Rejoinder to ‘Future Threats and Strategic Thinking’.” Infinity Journal 2, no. 2 (2012): 25–29.
- Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2018.
- Echevarria, Antulio J. Clausewitz and Contemporary War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Echevarria, Antulio J. Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for U.S. Military Strategy. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute U.S.A.W College Press, 2016.
- Fridman, Ofer. “Hybrid Warfare or Gibridnaya Voyna?” The RUSI Journal 162, no. 1 (2017): 42–49. doi:10.1080/03071847.2016.1253370.
- Fridman, Ofer. Russian ‘Hybrid Warfare’ Resurgence and Politicisation. London: Hurst & Company, 2018.
- Galeotti, Mark. “Hybrid, Ambiguous, and Non-Linear? How New Is Russia’s ‘New Way of War’?” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27, no. 2 (2016): 282–301. doi:10.1080/09592318.2015.1129170.
- Giegerich, Bastian. “Hybrid Warfare and the Changing Character of Conflict.” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 15, no. 2 (2016): 65–72. doi:10.11610/Connections.15.2.05.
- Glenn, Russell W. “Thoughts On ‘Hybrid’ Conflict.” Small Wars Journal (March 2009). Accessed November 20, 2020. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/thoughts-on-hybrid-conflict
- Gray, Colin S. Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges either as Irregular or Traditional. Carlisle PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2012.
- Gray, Colin S. Strategy and Defence Planning-Meeting the Challenge of Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
- Gray, Colin S. Theory of Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
- Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh. “Defining Strategic Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 1, no. 1 (2007): 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244.
- Hart, Liddell, and Basil Henry. The Strategy of Indirect Approach. London: Faber, 1967.
- Hoffman, Frank G. 2007. “Conflict in the 21 St Century : The Rise of Hybrid Wars.” Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. Accessed April 03, 2020. http://www.potomacinstitute.org/
- Hoffman, Frank G. “Hybrid Vs. Compound War, the Janus Choice: Defining Today’s Multifaceted Conflicts.” Armed Forces Journal, October (2009). Accessed November 20, 2020. http://armedforcesjournal.com/hybrid-vs-compound-war/
- Hoffman, Frank G. “Hybrid Warfare and Challenges.” Joint Force Quarterly 1st quarte, no. 52 (2009): 34–39.
- Hoffman, Frank G. “‘Hybrid Threats’: Neither Omnipotent Nor Unbeatable.” Orbis 54, no. 3 (2010): 441–455. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2010.04.009.
- Hoffman, Frank G. “On Not-So-New Warfare: Political Warfare Vs Hybrid Threats.” War on the Rocks. Accessed February 17, 2020. https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/on-not-so-new-warfare-political-warfare-vs-hybrid-threats/
- Hoffman, Frank G. “Thinking About Future Conflict.” Marine Corps Gazette 98, no. 11 (2014): 10–19.
- Johnson, Robert. “Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 29, no. 1 (2018): 141–163. doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1404770.
- Kofman, Michael. 2016. “Russian Hybrid Warfare and Other Dark Arts.” War on the Rocks, 1–9. Accessed November 20, 2020. http://warontherocks.com/2016/03/russian-hybrid-warfare-and-other-dark-arts/
- Lasconjarias, Guillaume, and Jeffrey A Larsen, ed. “Introduction: A New Way of Warfare.” In NATO’s Response to Hybrid Warfare, 1–13. Rome: NATO Defence College, 2015. http://armedforcesjournal.com/hybrid-vs-compound-war/
- Lonsdale, David J. The Nature of Warfare in the Information Age. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
- Loringhoven, Arndt Freytag von. 2017. ‘Adapting NATO Intelligence in Support of ‘One NATO’.” Accessed July 05, 2020. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2017/09/08/adapting-nato-intelligence-in-support-of-one-nato/index.html
- Maas, John. “Hybrid Threat and CSDP.” In Handbook on CSDP- the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union, edited by Jochen Rehrl, 125–130. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports of the Republic of Austria, 2017. doi:10.2855/764888.
- Mattis, James N., and Frank Hoffman. “Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars.” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings Magazine 131, no. 11 (2005): 18–19.
- Moustakas, Clark. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
- NATO. 2014. “Wales Summit Declaration.” Accessed September 17, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm
- NATO. 2015. “Meeting of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs.” Accessed March 27, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_125368.htm
- NATO. 2015. “White Paper- Next Steps in NATO’S Transformation: To the Warsaw Summit and Beyond.”
- NATO. 2016. “Warsaw Summit Communiqué.” Accessed April 23, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm
- NATO. 2018. “Brussels Summit Declaration.” NATO Press Release. Accessed January 02, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_156624.htm
- NATO. 2018. “Brussels Summit Declaration.” Accessed February 7, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_156624.htm
- NATO. 2018. “NATO Defence Planning Process.” Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49202.htm
- NATO. 2019. “London Declaration.” Accessed January 13, 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_171584.htm
- Owen, William F. 2009. “The War of New Words Why Military History Trumps Buzzwords.” Armed Forces Journal. Accessed September 20, 2020. http://armedforcesjournal.com/essay-the-war-of-new-words/.
- Pikner, Ivo, Pavel Zuna, Jan Spisak, and Vlastimil Galatik. Military Operating Concepts Development. Shopmybook. Puurs: Shopmybook, 2012.
- Poli, Fulvio. An Asymmetrical Symmetry: How Convention Has Become Innovative Military Thought. Carlisle: U.S. Army War College, 2010. Accessed March 5, 2020.
- Puyvelde, Damien Van. 2015. “Hybrid War – Does It Even Exist?” NATO Review Magazine, 2015–17. http://www.nato.int/docu/Review/2015/Also-in-2015/hybrid-modern-future-warfare-russia-ukraine/EN/index.htm
- Renz, Bettina, and Hanna Smith. 2016. “Russia and Hybrid Warfare - Going beyond the Label.” Aleksanteri Papers. Accessed September 1, 2020. www.helsinki.fi/aleksanteri/english/publications/aleksanteri_papers.html
- Rich, Paul B. “The Snowball Phenomenon: The US Marine Corps, Military Mythology and the Spread of Hybrid Warfare Theory.” Defense & Security Analysis 35, no. 4 (2019): 430–446. doi:10.1080/14751798.2019.1675942.
- Rid, Thomas. “Cyber War Will Not Take Place.” Journal of Strategic Studies 35, no. 1 (2012): 5–32. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.608939.
- Robinson, Linda, Todd C Helmus, Raphael S Cohen, Alireza Nader, Andrew Radin, Madeline Magnuson, and Katya Migacheva. Modern Political Warfare: Current Practices and Possible Responses. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2018. doi:10.7249/RR1772.
- Stoker, Donald. “What’s in a Name II: ‘Total War’ and Other Terms that Mean Nothing.” Infinity Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 21–23.
- Stoker, Donald, and Craig Whiteside. “Blurred Lines: Gray-Zone Conflict and Hybrid War-Two Failures of American Strategic Thinking.” Naval War College Review 73, no. 1 (2020). Accessed March 14, 2020. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol73/iss1/4.
- Tenenbaum, Élie. “Hybrid Warfare in the Strategic Spectrum: An Historical Assessment.” In NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats, edited by Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen, 95–112. Rome: NATO Defence College, 2015.
- TRADOC. 2013. “Regulation 71-20: Concept Development, Capabilities Determination, and Capabilities Integration, United States Army.”
- Tuck, Chris. 2017. “Hybrid War: The Perfect Enemy.” Accessed November 8, 2020. https://defenceindepth.co/2017/04/25/hybrid-war-the-perfect-enemy/
- U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2014. “JP 3-13 Information Operations.” U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Accessed September 17, 2020. https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_13.pdf
- Unite States Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2018. JP 3-0 Doctrine for Joint Operations.
- United States Department of the Army. 2017. FM 3-0 Operations.