Biofilm development in water distribution and drainage systems: dynamics and implications for hydraulic efficiency

References

• Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:711–745. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batté M, Appenzeller BMR, Grandjean D, Fass S, Gauthier V, Jorand F, Mathieu L, Boualam M, Saby S, Block JC. Biofilms in drinking water distribution systems. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2003;2(2):147–168. doi: 10.1023/B:RESB.0000040456.71537.29
   Google Scholar
• LeChevallier MW, Babcock TM, Lee RG. Examination and characterization of distribution system biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53(12):2714–2724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo Domingo JW, Revetta RP, Iker B, Gomez-Alvvarez V, Garcia J, Sullivan J, Weast J. Molecular survey of concrete sewer biofilm microbial communities. Biofouling. 2011;27(9):993–1001. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2011.618637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douterelo I, Sharpe RL, Boxall JB. Influence of hydraulic regimes on bacterial community structure and composition in an experimental drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 2013;47(2):503–516. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockling MA, Allen JJ, Smits AJ. Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech. 2006;564:267–285. doi: 10.1017/S0022112006001467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook CF, White CM. Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes. Proc Roy Soc London. Ser A, Math Phys Sci. 1937;161(906):367–381. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1937.0150
   Google Scholar
• Nikuradse J. Laws of flow in rough pipes. Mech Eng Pap. 1933;1292(1):1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Wallingford HR, Barr DIH. Tables for the hydraulic design of pipes, sewers and channels. London: Thomas Telford; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert MF, Brookes JD, Kildea M, Grantham T, McFarrlane B. Understanding the impact of biofilm growth on pipe roughness. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008. Honolulu, HI: ASCE; 2008. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Barton AF, Wallis MR, Sargison JE, Buia A, Walker GJ. Hydraulic roughness of biofouled pipes, biofilm character, and measured improvements from cleaning. J Hydraul Eng. 2008;134(6):852–857. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:6(852)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewartha JM, Sargison JE, Perkins KJ. The influence of freshwater biofilms on drag in hydroelectric power schemes. WSEAS Trans Fluid Mech. 2008;3(3):201–206.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz T, Hoffmann S, Obst U. Formation of natural biofilms during chlorine dioxide and u.v. disinfection in a public drinking water distribution system. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(3):591–601. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02019.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz T, Hoffmann S, Obst U. Formation and bacterial composition of young, natural biofilms obtained from public bank-filtered drinking water systems. Water Res. 1998;32(9):2787–2797. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton AF. Friction, roughness and boundary layer characteristics of freshwater biofilms in hydraulic conduits [PhD Thesis]. Hobart, Tasmania: School of Engineering, University of Tasmania; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Lewandowki Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott, HM. Oscillation characteristics of biofilm streamers in turbulent flowing water as related to drag and pressure drop. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;57(5):536–544. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980305)57:5<536::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picologlou BF, Zelver N, Charcklis WG. Biofilm growth and hydraulic performance. J Hydraul Div. 1980;106(5):733–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. Turbulent boundary layers on surfaces covered with filamentous algae. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Fluids Eng. 2000;122(2):357–363. doi: 10.1115/1.483265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG. Bioengineering report: fouling biofilm development: a process analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1981;23(9):1923–1960. doi: 10.1002/bit.260230902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG. Attached microbial growths – II. Frictional resistance due to microbial slimes. Water Res. 1973;7(9):1249–1258. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90002-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Swain GW. The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers. J Fluids Eng. 1999;121(1):44–51. doi: 10.1115/1.2822009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkus AJ. Deterioration of the hydraulic capacity of pipelines. J N Engl Water Works Assoc. 1954;68(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert L, Kruger W. Unusually high friction factor in a long, water supply line. VDI Z. 1950;92:189–191.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp BB. Examination of the friction in the Morgan-Whyalla pipeline. Prepared for Engineering & Water Supply Department; Adelaide; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. BS EN 752:2008. Drain and sewer systems outside buildings. London: BSI; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Water Research Centre (Great Britain). Sewers for adoption. 6th ed. Swindon: WRc plc; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins S, Henderson AD, Walker JM, Li XL. The influence of bacteria based biofouling on the wall friction and velocity distribution of hydropower pipes. In 18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference; Launceston, Tasmania; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Barton AF, Sylvester MW, Sargison JE, Walker GJ, Denne AB. Deterioration of conduit efficiency due to biofouling. In 8th National Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering; Queensland, Australia; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert MF, Edeards RWJ, Howie SJ, De Gilio BB, Quinn SP. The impact of biofilm development on pipe roughness and velocity profile. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009. Kansas City, MO: ASCE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Doods I, Biyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. Influence of hydrodynamics and nutrients on biofilm structure. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(S1):19S–28S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05279.x
   Google Scholar
• Manning R. On the flow of water in open channels and pipes. Trans Inst. Civil Eng, Ireland. 1890;20:167–207.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman K, La Motta EJ. McCorguodale JA, Rojas S, Ermogenous M. Effect of biofilm formation on roughness coefficient and solids deposition in small-diameter PVC sewer pipes. J Environ Eng. 2007;133(4):364–371. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:4(364)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignaga E. The effect of biofilm colonization on the stability of non-cohesive sediments [PhD Thesis]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai F, Zayed T. Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipelines. J Perform Constructed Facil. 2008;22(5):333–341. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(333)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi RHSM, Campisano C, Modica P, Willems J, Berlamont J. Modelling the erosive effects of sewer flushing using different sediment transport formulas. In 7th International Conference on Sewer Processes and Networks, SPN7; Sheffield, UK; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Creaco E, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L. Numerical simulation of flushing effect on sewer sediments and comparison of four sediment transport formulas. J Hydraul Res. 2009;47(2):195–202. doi: 10.3826/jhr.2009.3363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen AH, Yongsiri C, Hvitved-Jaconsen T, Vollemen J. Influence of pipe material and surfaces on sulfide related odor and corrosion in sewers. Water Res. 2008;42(15):4206–4214. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola A, de Hass D, Keller J, Yuan Z. Methane formation in sewer systems. Water Res. 2008;42(6):1421–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momba MNB, Kfir R, Venter SN, Cloete TE. An overview of biofilm formation in distribution systems and its impact on the deterioration of water quality. Water SA. 2000;26:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prévost M, Rompre A, Coallir J, Servais P, Laurent P, Clement B, Lafrance P. Suspended bacterial biomass and activity in full-scale drinking water distribution systems: impact of water treatment. Water Res. 1998;32(5):1393–1406. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00388-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husband PS, Boxall, JB, Saul, AJ. Laboratory studies investigating the processes leading to discolouration in water distribution networks. Water Res. 2008;42(16):4309–4318. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisnor J, Gagnon G. A framework for the implementation and design of pilot-scale distribution systems. J Water SRT-Aqua. 2003;52:501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting H. Boundary layer theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain AHL. The role of adsorbed layers in bacterial adhesion. Biofilms Science and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1992. p. 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Vigeant MAS, Ford RM, Wagner M, Tamm LK. Reversible and irreversible adhesion of motile Escherichia coli cells analyzed by total internal reflection aqueous fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(6):2794–2801. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2794-2801.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo LF, Bott TR. Biofouling in water systems. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 1997;14(4):375–381. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1777(96)00139-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam NB, West JR, Forster CF, Simms J. The potential for biofilm growth in water distribution systems. Water Res. 2001;35(17):4063–4071. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00248-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boe-Hansen R, Albrechtsen HJ, Arvin E, Jogensen C. Bulk water phase and biofilm growth in drinking water at low nutrient conditions. Water Res. 2002;36(18):4477–4486. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00191-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelleberg S, Givskov M. The biofilm mode of life: mechanisms and adaptations. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart PS. Mini-review: convection around biofilms. Biofouling. 2012;28(2):187–198. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2012.662641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete TE, Jacobs L, Brözel VS. The chemical control of biofouling in industrial water systems. Biodegradation. 1998;9(1):23–37. doi: 10.1023/A:1008216209206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetanova Z. Study of biofilm formation on different pipe materials in a model of drinking water distribution system and its impact on microbiological water quality. Chemicals as intentional and accidental global environmental threats. Netherlands: Springer; 2006:463–468.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Zhang Y, Li G. Effect of pipe material and low level disinfectants on biofilm development in a simulated drinking water distribution system. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A. 2009;10(5):725–731. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A0820486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen K. Biofilm development on stainless steel and PVC surfaces in drinking water. Water Res. 1990;24(2):239–243. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(90)90109-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete TE, Westaard D, van Vuuren SJ. Dynamic response of biofilm to pipe surface and fluid velocity. Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(5):57–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauchlan C, Forty J, May R. Flow resistance of wastewater pumping mains. Water Manage. 2005;158(2):81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaltema A, Arts PAM, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Kuenen JG, Heijnen JJ. Heterogeneity of biofilms in rotating annular reactors: occurrence, structure, and consequences. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;44(2):194–204. doi: 10.1002/bit.260440208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Kooij D, Vrouwenvelder HS, Veenendaal HR. Density and composition of biofilms in drinking water distribution systems in the Netherlands. In AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference; New Orleans, LA; 1995. p. 1055–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Niquette P, Servais P, Savoir R. Impacts of pipe materials on densities of fixed bacterial biomass in a drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 2000;34(6):1952–1956. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00307-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel CM, Nunes OC, Melo LF. Dynamics of drinking water biofilm in flow/non-flow conditions. Water Res. 2007;41(3):551–562. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins JA, Gardiner IM. The hydraulic roughness of slimed sewers. ICE Proceedings. 1985;79:87–104. doi: 10.1680/iicep.1985.1081
   Google Scholar
• Bridier A, Briandet R, Thomas V, Dubois-Brissonnet F. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review. Biofouling. 2011;27(9):1017–1032. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2011.626899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewartha JM, Sargison J. Turbulence and mean-velocity structure of flows over filamentous biofilms. In 34th IAHR World Congress; Brisbane, Australia; 2011. p. 2225–2232.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski Z, Stoodley P. Flow induced vibrations, drag force, and pressure drop in conduits covered with biofilm. Water Sci Technol. 1995;2(8):19–26. doi: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer D. Stoodley P, Roe F, Lewandsowski Z. Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;43(11):1131–1138. doi: 10.1002/bit.260431118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos R, Callow ME, Bott TR. The structure of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in contact with flowing systems. Biofouling. 1991;4(4):319–336. doi: 10.1080/08927019109378222
   Google Scholar
• Percival SL, Knapp JS, Wales DS, Edyvean RGJ. The effect of turbulent flow and surface roughness on biofilm formation in drinking water. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;22(3):152–159. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.2900622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton B. A question of scale and slime. Water Waste Treat. 1995;38(4):39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell ARM, Church M. Turbulent flow in a depth-limited boundary layer. J Geophys Res. 1979;84(C8):4816–4824. doi: 10.1029/JC084iC08p04816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr CJ, Osborn KS, Robson GD, Handley PS. The relationship between pipe material and biofilm formation in a laboratory model system. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;85(1):29S–38S.
   Google Scholar
• Momba MNB, Makala N. Comparing the effect of various pipe materials on biofilm formation in chlorinated and combined chlorine-chloraminated water systems. Water SA. 2004;30(2):175–182. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v30i2.5061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurth JC. Mitigating biofilm growth through the modification of concrete design and practice [MSc Thesis]. Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Verran J, Lees G, Shakespeare AP. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of Candida albicans to acrylic. Biofouling. 1991;3(3):183–191. doi: 10.1080/08927019109378173
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Kim D, Lee T. Microbial diversity in biofilms on water distribution pipes of different materials. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(1):163–171. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewartha JM. The effect of freshwater biofilms on turbulent boundary layers and the implications for hydropower canals [PhD Thesis]. Hobart, Tasmania: School of Engineering, University of Tasmania; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sand W, Bock E. Biodeterioration of mineral materials by microorganisms – biogenic sulfuric and nitric acid corrosion of concrete and natural stone. Geomicrobiol J. 1991;9(2–3):129–138. doi: 10.1080/01490459109385994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylarde CC, Morton LHG. Deteriogenic biofilms on buildings and their control: a review. Biofouling. 1999;14(1):59–74. doi: 10.1080/08927019909378397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen AH, Yongsiri C, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Vollemen J. Simulation of sulfide buildup in wastewater and atmosphere of sewer networks. Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(3):201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtola MJ, Miettinena IT, Minna M, Keinänena, Kekkia TK, Laineb O, Hirvonenc A, Vartiainenb T, Martikainenc PJ. Microbiology, chemistry and biofilm development in a pilot drinking water distribution system with copper and plastic pipes. Water Res. 2004;38(17):3769–3779. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival SL, Knapp JS, Edyvean R, Wales DS. Biofilm development on stainless steel in mains water. Water Res. 1998;32(1):243–253. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00132-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Monim YK, Ead SA, Shabayek SA. Effect of time on pipe roughness. In 17th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bland CEG, Bayley RW, Thomas EV. Some observations on the accumulation of slime in drainage pipes the effect of these accumulations on resistance to flow. Public Health Eng. 1975;13:21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bott TR, Miller PC. Mechanisms of biofilm formation on aluminium tubes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1983;33(3):177–184. doi: 10.1002/jctb.280330307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming HC. Biofouling in water systems – cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;59(6):629–640. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1066-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming H-C, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Micro. 2010;8(9):623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmokoff ML, Austin JW, Wan XD, Sanders G, Benerjee S, Farber JM. Adsorption, attachment and biofilm formation among isolates of Listeria monocytogenes using model conditions. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(4): 725–734. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01419.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Stewart PS, Griebe T, Chen CI, Xu X. Biofilm parameters influencing biocide efficacy. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;46(6):553–560. doi: 10.1002/bit.260460608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeChevallier MW, Cawthon CD, Lee RG. Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988;54(3):649–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WL, McFeters GA, Stewart PS. Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine. J Appl Microbiol. 2000;88(1):22–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00825.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simes LC, Azevedo N, Pacheco A, Keevil CW, Vieira MJ. Drinking water biofilm assessment of total and culturable bacteria under different operating conditions. Biofouling. 2006;22(2):91–99. doi: 10.1080/08927010600598603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan NJ, Eccles CR. Purification and characterization of extracellular polysaccharide from activated sludges. Water Res. 1986;20(11):1427–1432. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90142-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin JAS, Forster CF. A further examination into the composition of activated sludge surfaces in relation to their settlement characteristics. Water Res. 1985;19(4):527–533. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(85)90045-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi X, Gao J, Sun D, Liang W, Wan Y, Li C, Xu X, Gao T. Biofilm formation of the pathogens of fatal bacterial granuloma after trauma: potential mechanism underlying the failure of traditional antibiotic treatments. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(3):221–228. doi: 10.1080/00365540701632998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash B, Veeregowda BM, Krishnappa G. Biofilms: a sur- vival strategy of bacteria. Curr Sci. 2003;85(9):1299–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, JW Costerton. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):167–193. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft JU, Wimpenny JWT. Effect of EPS on biofilm structure and function as revealed by an individual-based model of biofilm growth. Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(6):135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland IW. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology. 2001;147(1):3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Hu JY, Ong SL. Influence of phosphorus on biofilm formation in model drinking water distribution systems. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106(4):1328–1335. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04099.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoa PT, Nair L, Visvanathan C. The effect of nutrients on extracellular polymeric substance production and its influence on sludge properties. Water SA. 2004;29(4):437–442. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v29i4.5050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson S, Klapper I. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;29(6):361–367. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wloka M, Rehage H, Flemming HC, Wingender J. Rheological properties of viscoelastic biofilm extracellular polymeric substances and comparison to the behavior of calcium alginate gels. Colloid Polym Sci. 2004;282(10):1067–1076. doi: 10.1007/s00396-003-1033-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molobela IP, Ilunga FM. Impact of bacterial biofilms: the importance of quantitative biofilm studies. Ann Microbiol. 2012;62(2):461–467. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0344-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy H. Recherches expérimentales relatives au mouvement de l'eau dans les tuyaux. Vol. 1. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier; 1857.
   Google Scholar
• Moody LF. Friction factors for pipe flow. Trans ASME. 1944;66(8):671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen BA, Locher FA, Swamee PK. Limitations and proper use of the Hazen–Williams equation. J Hydraul Eng. 2000;126(2):167–170. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:2(167)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett D, Glaser R. Common pitfalls in hydraulic design of large diameter pipelines: case studies and good design practice. In ASCE Pipelines Conference 2011; Seattle, WA; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon BJ, Jiang LIW, Morrison JF, Smits AJ. Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow. J Fluid Mech. 2004;501:135–147. doi: 10.1017/S0022112003007304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton AF, Sargison JE, Osborn JE, Perkins K, Hallegraeff G. Characterizing the roughness of freshwater biofilms using a photogrammetric methodology. Biofouling. 2010;26(4):439–448. doi: 10.1080/08927011003699733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauen WB, Lin B, Falconer RA. Modelling dynamic bed roughness associated with bed form development. In 16th IAHR-APD Congress and 3rd IAHR-ISHS Symposium; Nanjing, China; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rauen WB, Lin B, Falconer RA. Modelling ripple development under non-uniform flow and sediment supply-limited conditions in a laboratory flume. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 2009;82(3):452–460. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp WW, Walski TM. Predicting internal roughness in water mains. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1988;80:34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion YR, MacLean HL, Karney BW. Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system. J Infrastruct Syst. 2004;10(3):120–130. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:3(119)
   Google Scholar
• Andrewartha JM, Sargison JE, Perkins KJ. The effect of gomphonema and filamentous algae streamers on hydroelectric canal capacity and turbulent boundary layer structure. In 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC); Gold Coast: School of Engineering, The University of Queensland; 2007. p. 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Barton AF, Sargison JE, Brandner P, Walker GJ. A force balance to measure the total drag of biofilms on test plates. In 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC); Gold Coast: School of Engineering, The University of Queensland Gold Coast; 2007. p. 819–824.
   Google Scholar