Hydrodynamic modelling of free water-surface constructed storm water wetlands using a finite volume technique

References

• Scholz M. Wetland systems – storm water management control. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wong THF, Breen PF, Somes NLG, Lloyd SD. Managing urban stormwater using constructed wetlands. 2nd ed. Clayton: Monash University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. New Jersey storm water best management practices manual. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Walton WE. Design and management of free water surface constructed wetlands to minimize mosquito production. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 2012;20:173–195. doi: 10.1007/s11273-011-9243-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadlec RH, Knight RL. Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy KR, DeBusk TA. State-of-the-art utilization of aquatic plants in water pollution control. Water Sci Technol. 1987;19:61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn RM, Fiedler FR. Increasing hydraulic residence time in constructed stormwater treatment wetlands with designed bottom topography. Water Environ. Res. 2006;78:2514–2523. doi: 10.2175/106143006X101944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF. Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci Technol. 1999;40:291–300. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00448-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa MZ. Graphical representation of nutrient removal in constructed wetlands. Wetlands. 1997;17:493–501. doi: 10.1007/BF03161515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somes NLG, Persson J, Wong THF. Influence of wetland design parameters on the hydrodynamics of storm water wetlands. In: Proceedings of HydraStorm, 3rd International Conference on Stormwater Management; 1998; Adelaide, pp. 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Walker DJ. Modeling residence time in storm water ponds. Ecol Eng. 1998;10:247–262. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00016-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worman A, Kronnas V. Effect of pond shape and vegetation heterogeneity on flow and treatment performance of constructed wetlands. J Hydrol. 2005;301:123–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins GA, Greenway M. The hydraulic efficiency of fringing versus banded vegetation in constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2005;25:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su T-M, Yang S-C, Shih S-S, Lee H-Y. Optimal design for hydraulic efficiency performance of free-water-surface constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2009;35:1200–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JH, Wise WR. Depth-averaged, spatially distributed flow dynamic and solute transport modelling of a large-scaled, subtropical constructed wetland. Hydrol Proc. 2010;24:2724–2737. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago ME, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Mahmoudi M, Engel V. Numerical modelling of the effects of water flow, sediment transport and vegetation growth on the spatiotemporal patterning of the ridge and slough landscape of the Everglades wetland. Adv Water Resour. 2010;33:1268–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamsley TV, Cialone MA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Rosati JD. The potential of wetlands in reducing storm surge. Ocean Eng. 2010;37:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Huang S-L, He C-D, Ng C-O. Numerical analysis of the performance of horizontal and wavy subsurface flow constructed wetlands. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 1011;23:339–347. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60121-7
   Google Scholar
• Arega F. Hydrodynamic modelling and characterizing of Lagrangian flows in the West Scott Creek wetlands system, South Carolina. J Hydro-environ Res. 2013;7:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C-P, Lung W-S, Kuo J-T, Lai J-S, Wang Y-M, Hsu C-H. Using an integrated model to track the fate and transport of suspended solids and heavy metals in the tidal wetlands. Int J Sedim Res. 2012;27:201–212. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6279(12)60028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh-Yazdi SR, Zounemat-Kermani M. Vertex base unstructured finite volume solution on depth averaged tidal currents on 3D bed. Iran J Sci Technol B. 2008;32:563–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zounemat-Kermani M, Sabbagh-Yazdi SR. Coupling of two- and three-dimensional hydrodynamic numerical models for simulating wind-induced currents in deep ponds. Comput Fluids. 2010;39:994–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasoiu K, Chan CT. Solution of the 2D shallow water equations using the finite volume method on unstructured triangular meshes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 1997;24:1225–1245. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970615)24:11<1225::AID-FLD540>3.0.CO;2-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ern A, Piperno AES, Djadel K. A well-balanced Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for the shallow-water equations with flooding and drying. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2007;58:1–25. doi: 10.1002/fld.1674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quecedo M, Pastor M. A reappraisal of Taylor–Galerkin algorithm for drying–wetting areas in shallow water computations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2002;38:515–531. doi: 10.1002/fld.225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodi W. Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics – a state of the art review. 3rd ed. Delft: International Association for Hydraulic Research; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz M, Harrington R, Carroll P, Mustafa A. The Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands. 2007;27:337–354. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[337:TICWIC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz M, Trepel M. Hydraulic characteristics of groundwater-fed open ditches in a peatland. Ecol Eng. 2004;23:29–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panuvatvanich A, Koottatep T, Koné D. Hydraulic behaviour of vertical-flow constructed wetland under different operating conditions. Environ Technol. 2009;30(10):1031–1040. doi: 10.1080/09593330903051667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Cirpka OA, Kitanidis PK. Temporal-moment matching for truncated breakthrough curves for step or step-pulse injection. Adv Water Resour. 2006;29:1306–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Cai X, Yeh T-CJ. Analysis of tracer tomography using temporal moments of tracer breakthrough curves. Adv Water Resour. 2009;32:391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelar FF, de Matos AT, de Matos MP, Borges AC. Coliform bacteria removal from sewage in constructed wetlands planted with Mentha aquatic. Environ Technol. 2014;35(16):2095–2103. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.893025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsihrintzis VA, Akratos CS, Gikas GD, Karamouzis D, Angelakis AN. Performance and cost comparison of a FWS and a VSF constructed wetland system. Environ Technol. 2007;28:621–628. doi: 10.1080/09593332808618820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmento AP, Borges AC, de Matos AT. Effect of cultivated species and retention time on the performance of constructed wetlands. Environ Technol. 2013;34(8):961–965. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.724210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe DA, Castle JW, Molza FJ, Rodgers JH. Effects of evapotranspiration on treatment performance in constructed wetlands: experimental studies and modelling. Ecol Eng. 2014;71:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar