Effect of COD/TP ratio on biological nutrient removal in A²O and SBR processes coupled with microfiltration and effluent reuse potential

References

• Raffin M, Germain E, Judd S. Wastewater polishing using membrane technology: a review of existing installations. Environ Technol. 2013;34:617–627. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.710385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CY, Hong SW, Chun TH, Choi YS. Performance evaluation of pretreatment processes in integrated membrane system for wastewater reuse. Desalination. 2010;250:673–676. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia N, Moreno J, Cartmell E, Rodriguez-Roda I, Judd S. The application of microfiltration-reverse osmosis/nanofiltration to trace organics removal for municipal wastewater reuse. Environ Technol. 2013;34:3183–3189. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2013.808244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso E, Santos A, Solis GJ, Riesco P. On the feasibility of urban wastewater tertiary treatment by membranes: a comparative assessment. Desalination. 2001;141:39–51. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00387-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decarolis J, Hong SK, Taylor J. Fouling behavior of a pilot scale inside-out hollow fiber UF membrane during dead-end filtration of tertiary wastewater. J Memb Sci. 2001;191:165–178. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00455-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu QH, Shim H. Comparison of chloride effect between A2O and SBR processes treating domestic wastewater. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;53:2549–2554. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.863739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coma M, Puig S, Monclús H, Balaguer MD, Colprim J. Effect of cycle changes on simultaneous biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Environ Technol. 2010;31:285–294. doi: 10.1080/09593330903464043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang XG, Wang SY, Peng YZ. Optimization of phosphorus removal in UniFed SBR system for domestic wastewater treatment. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2010;4:475–481. doi: 10.1007/s11783-010-0244-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artan N, Orhon D. Mechanism and design of sequencing batch reactors for nutrient removal: scientific and technical report. London: IWA Publishing; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera J, Sarra M, Lafuente FJ, Vicent T. Effect of different operational parameters in the enhanced biological phosphorus removal process. Experimental design and results. Environ Technol. 2001;22:1439–1446. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2001.11090878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YM, Kwon KH, Kim SW. Optimization of phosphorus reduction in BNR process for urban watershed management. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;38:302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Lu QH, Xie WB, Shim H. Comparison of A(2)O and SBR processes for the Advanced Biological Wastewater Treatment. Res J Chem Environ. 2010;15:629–632.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao CH, Peng YZ, Wang SY, Tang XG. Influence of wastewater composition on biological nutrient removal in UniFed SBR process. Water Sci Technol. 2008;58:803–810. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao CH, Peng YZ, Wang SY, Takigawa A. Effects of influent C/N ratio, C/P ratio and volumetric exchange ratio on biological phosphorus removal in UniFed SBR process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83:1587–1595. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuneda S, Ohno T, Soejima K, Hirata A. Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal using denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms in a sequencing batch reactor. Biochem Eng J. 2006;v27:191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Peng YZ, Wang XL, Wang SY. Nutrient removal performance of an anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic process as a function of influent C/P ratio. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2005;80:1118–1124. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng DC, Bernet N, Delgenes JP, Moletta R. Aerobic granular sludge - a case report. Water Res. 1999;33:890–893. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00443-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Trusell RR. Standards methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Mhurchú JN, Foley G. Dead-end filtration of yeast suspensions: Correlating specific resistance and flux data using artificial neural networks. J Memb Sci. 2006;281:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu R, Wu M, Yang J. Effect of sludge retention time and phosphorus to carbon ratio on biological phosphorus removal in HS-SBR process. Environ Technol. 2013;34:429–435. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.698650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Lim M, Harjono S, Ng WJ. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission by denitrifying phosphorus removal culture using polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) as carbon source. J Environ Sci. 2012;24:1616–1623. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60996-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath M, Shero G, Welton J. Fermentation for improving nutrient removal at a Virginia wastewater treatment facility. Proc. of the WEF's 78th Annual Technical and Educational Conference, Washington, DC, October 29–November 2, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhold J, Arnold E, Isaacs S. Effect of nitrite on anoxic phosphate uptake in biological phosphorus removal activated sludge. Water Res. 1999;33:1871–1883. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00411-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Xiong B, Zhang S, Yang H, Zhang J. Effects of nitrite on phosphate uptake in anaerobic-oxic process. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2007;1:39–42. doi: 10.1007/s11783-007-0007-3
   Google Scholar
• Peng YZ, Yong MA, Wang SY. Denitrification potential enhancement by addition of external carbon sources in a pre-denitrification process. J Environ Sci. 2007;19:284–289. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge S, Peng Y, Wang S, et al. Enhanced nutrient removal in a modified step feed process treating municipal wastewater with different inflow distribution ratios and nutrient ratios. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:9012–9019. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT. Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking, foaming and other solids separation problems. 3rd ed. London: IWA Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota MC, Freire DMG. A review on hydrolytic enzymes in the treatment of wastewater with high oil and grease content. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:2195–2210. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar