Effect of constant magnetic field on anaerobic digestion of algal biomass

References

• Patil V, Tran KQ, Giselrad HR. Towards sustainable production of biofuels from microalgae. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9:1188–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, et al. Biofuels from microalgae. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24:815–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pienkos P, Darzins A. The promise and challenges of microalgal-derived biofuels. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin. 2009;3:431–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dębowski M, Zieliński M, Grala A, et al. Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies – review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;27:596–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley PE, Campbell JE, McKuin B. Production of biodiesel and biogas from algae: a review of process train options. Water Environ Res. 2011;83:326–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O. Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harun R, Danquah MK, Forde GM. Microalgal biomass as a fermentation feedstock for bioethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2010;85:199–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O. Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Fernández A, Vargas G, Alarcón N, et al. Evaluation of marine algae as a source of biogas in a two-stage anaerobic reactor system. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32:338–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocke M, Mahnert P, Mundt K, et al. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2007;30:139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter A, Bekel T, Diaz NN, et al. The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol. 2008;136:77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda H. Sugar composition of the cell wall and the taxonomy of Chlorella (Chlorophyceae). J Phycol. 1991;27:224–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda H. Cell wall sugars of some Scenedesmus species. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:673–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burczyk J, Dworzański J. Comparison of sporopollenin-like algal resistant polymer from the cell wall of Botryococcus, Scenedesmus and Lycopodium clavatum by GC pyrolysis. Phytochemistry. 1988;27:2151–2153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand M, Davis AK, Smith SR, et al. The place of diatoms in the biofuels industry. Biofuels. 2012;3:221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Grala A, Zieliński M, Dębowski M, et al. Effects of hydrothermal depolymerization and enzymatic hydrolysis of algae biomass on yield of methane fermentation process. Pol J Environ Stud. 2012;21:361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieliński M, Dębowski M, Grala A, et al. The effect of pressure and temperature pretreatment on the biogas output from algal biomass. Environ Technol. 2015;36:693–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohutskyi P, Betenbaugh MJ, Bouwer EJ. The effects of alternative pretreatment strategies on anaerobic digestion and methane production from different algal strains. Bioresour Technol. 2014;155:366–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwede S, Kowalczyk A, Gerber M, Span R. Influence of different cell disruption techniques on mono digestion of algal biomass. World Renewable Energy Congress, Linkoping, Sweden; 2011. p. 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K, Chantrasakdakul P, Kim D, et al. Ultrasound pretreatment of filamentous algal biomass for enhanced biogas production. Waste Manag. 2014;34:1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohutskyi P, Chow S, Ketter B, Betenbaugh MJ, Bouwer EJ. Prospects for methane production and nutrient recycling from lipid extracted residues and whole Nannochloropsis salina using anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy. 2015;154:718–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Zhongzhi Z, Luo Y, et al. Biogas productivity by co-digesting Taihu blue algae with corn straw as an external carbon source State Key. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dębowski M, Zieliński M, Krzemieniewski M, et al. Effect of magneto-active filling on the effectiveness of methane fermentation of dairy wastewaters. Int J Green Energy. 2014. doi:10.1080/15435075.2014.909362.
   Google Scholar
• Zieliński M, Dębowski M, Krzemieniewski M, et al. Effect of constant magnetic field with various values of magnetic induction on the effectiveness of dairy wastewaters treatment under anaerobic conditions. Pol J Environ Stud. 2014;23:255–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieliński M, Dębowski M, Krzemieniewski M, et al. Effectiveness of dairy wastewater treatment in anaerobic reactors with magnetoactive filling. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2014;34:427–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Li X. Effect of static magnetic field on synthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates from different short-chain fatty acids by activated sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:5538–5544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CZ, Wang F, Ou-Yang F. Ethanol fermentation in a magnetically fluidized bed reactor with immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in magnetic particles. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:878–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Xu NS, Su WW. Co-immobilized enzymes in magnetic chitosan beads for improved hydrolysis of macromolecular substrates under a time-varying magnetic field. J Biotechnol. 2010;148:119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz H, Celebi SS. Effects of a magnetic field on the activity of activated sludge in wastewater treatment. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000;26:22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez DC, Pérez VH, Justo OR, et al. Effect of the extremely low frequency magnetic field on nisin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis using cheese whey permeate. Process Biochem. 2006;41:967–1973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dębowski M, Krzemieniewski M, Zieliński M. Constant magnetic field influence on the stabilization of the excess sludge with Fenton's reagent. Pol J Environ Stud. 2007;16:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzemieniewski M, Teodorowicz M, Dębowski M, et al. Effect of constant magnetic field on water quality and rearing of European sheatfish Sirulus glanis L. larvae. Aquac Res. 2004;35:568–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzemieniewski M, Dębowski M, Dobrzyńska A, et al. Chemical oxygen demand reduction of various wastewater types using magnetic field – assisted Fenton reaction. Water Environ Res. 2004;76:301–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzemieniewski M, Dębowski M, Janczukowicz W, et al. Effect of sludge conditioning by chemical methods with magnetic field application. Pol J Environ Stud. 2003;12:595–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzemieniewski M, Dębowski M, Janczukowicz W, et al. Effect of constant magnetic field on the composition of dairy wastewater and domestic sewage. Pol J Environ Stud. 2004;13:45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janosz-Rajczyk M, Tomska A. The influence of magnetic field on the process of wastewater treatment (part II): transformations of organic compounds and nitrogen in the magnetic field induction 20 mT and 40 mT (in Polish). Arch Environ Prot. 2002;28:41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kayhanian M, Tchobanoglous G. Computation of C/N ratios for various organic fractions. Biocycle. 1992;33:58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Marchaim U, Krause C. Propionic to acetic-acid ratios in overloaded anaerobic-digestion. Bioresour Technol. 1993;43:195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen HW, Brune DE. Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamalloa C, Boon N, Verstraete W. Anaerobic digestibility of Scenedesmus obliquus and Phaeodactylum tricornutum under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Appl Energy. 2012;92:733–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver SM, Hulatt CJ, Thomas DN, et al. Thermophilic, anaerobic co-digestion of microalgal biomass and cellulose for H2 production. Biodegradation. 2011;22:805–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioabla AE, Ionel I, Dumitrel GA, et al. Comparative study on factors affecting anaerobic digestion of agricultural vegetal residues. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar