Fouling of a spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane processing swine wastewater: effect of cleaning procedure on fouling resistance

References

• Hjorth M, Christensen KV, Christensen ML, Sommer SG. Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2010;30:153–180. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörneby L, Persson K, Trägårdh, G. Treatment of liquid effluents from dairy cattle and pigs using reverse osmosis. J Agric Eng Res. 1999;73:159–170. doi: 10.1006/jaer.1998.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic O, Hjorth M, Jensen LS. Phosphorus, copper and zinc in solid and liquid fractions from full-scale and laboratory-separated pig slurry. Environ Technol. 2012;33:2119–2131. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.660649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Bellemare G, Dubreuil J. RO membrane filtration of pretreated swine manure with high levels of suspended solids. Trans ASABE. 2012;55:1815–1820. doi: 10.13031/2013.42372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Mondor M, Dubreuil J. Aging of RO membranes processing swine wastewater. Trans ASABE. 2013;56:1571–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RH, Yang P, Pan Z, Wolf TD, Turnbull JH. Treatment of swine wastewater with biological conversion, filtration, and reverse osmosis: a laboratory study. Trans ASABE. 2004;47:243–250. doi: 10.13031/2013.15865
   Google Scholar
• Masse L, Massé DI, Pellerin Y, Dubreuil J. Osmotic pressure and substrate resistance during the concentration of manure nutrients by reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci. 2010;348:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Elimelech M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:4683–4693. doi: 10.1021/es0354162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Padmasiri SI, Fitch M, Norddahl B, Raskin L, Morgenroth E. Influence of cleaning frequency and membrane history on fouling in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Desalination. 2007;207:153–166. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek EMV, Allred J, Knoell T, Jeong B-H. Modeling the effects of fouling on full-scale reverse osmosis processes. J Membr Sci. 2008;314:33–49. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltuniewicz A, Noworyta A. Dynamic properties of ultrafiltration systems in light of the surface renewal theory. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1994;33:1771–1779. doi: 10.1021/ie00031a016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova JD, Islam MA. Contribution of adsorbed layer resistance to the flux-decline in an ultrafiltration process. J Membr Sci. 1998;146:105–111. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00086-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang BH, Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration of skimmilk in hollow fibers. J Food Sci. 1986;51:340–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb11124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu AI, Vrouwenvelder JS, van Loosdrecht MCM, Picioreanu C. Modeling the effect of biofilm formation on reverse osmosis performance: flux, feed channel pressure drop and solute passage. J Membr Sci. 2010;365:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Tarabara VV. Coupled effects of colloidal deposition and salt concentration polarization on reverse osmosis membrane performance. J Membr Sci. 2007;293:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Mondor M, Talbot G, et al. Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes processing swine wastewater pretreated by mechanical separation and aerobic biofiltration. Separ Sci Technol. 2014;49:1298–1308. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2014.881880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Elimelech M. Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: measurements and fouling mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol. 1997;31:3654–3662. doi: 10.1021/es970400v
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri-Rumbau, MS. Personal visit to Gebrüderen Verkoyen Loonbedriejf Mestdistributie. Langeweg, Netherlands. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Masse L, Mondor M, Puig-Bargués J, Deschênes L, Talbot G. The efficiency of various chemical solutions to clean reverse osmosis membranes processing swine wastewater. Water Qual Res J Can. 2014;49:295–306. doi: 10.2166/wqrjc.2014.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Puig-Bargués J, Mondor M, Deschênes L, Talbot G. Efficiency of EDTA, SDS and NaOH solutions to clean RO membranes processing swine wastewater. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;50:2509–2517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, M. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bird MR, Fryer PJ. Experimental study of the cleaning of surfaces fouled by whey proteins. Food Bioproducts Process Trans Inst Chem Eng, C. 1991;69:13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Väisänen P, Bird MR, Nyström M. Treatment of UF membranes with simple and formulated cleaning agents. Food Bioproducts Process Trans Inst Chem Eng, C. 2002;80:98–108. doi: 10.1205/09603080252938735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block SS. Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen MJ, Zhu ZH. Synergism in binary mixtures of surfactants. 10. Negative synergism in surface tension reduction effectiveness. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1989;133:473–478. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(89)80058-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaeni SS, Samieirad S. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane fouled by wastewater. Desalination. 2010;257:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm M. Animal Fats. [cited 2015 Jan 15] . Available from: http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ang WS, Tiraferri A, Chen KL, Elimelech M. Fouling and cleaning of RO membranes fouled by mixtures of organic foulants simulating wastewater effluent. J Membr Sci. 2011;376:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijnen WAM, Castillo C, Brouwer-Hanzens AH, Harmsen DJH, Cornelissen ER, van der Kooij D. Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of spiral-wound membrane cleaning procedures to remove biofilms. Water Res. 2012;46:6369–6381. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreszer C, Flemming HC, Zwijnenburg A, Kruithof JC, Vrouwenvelder JS. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient. Water Res. 2014;50:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen CO, Masse L, Hjorth M. The effect of residual cationic polymers in swine wastewater on the fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Environ Technol. 2014;35:1338–1344. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2013.868038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Mondor M, Dubreuil J. Membrane filtration of the liquid fraction from a solid-liquid separator for swine manure using a cationic polymer as flocculating agent. Environ Technol. 2013;34:671–677. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.710409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fane AG. Membranes for water production and wastewater reuse. Desalination. 1996;106:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(96)00085-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell RS, Merlo RP, Hermanowicz SW, Jenkins D. The effect of organic loading on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2006;40:2675–2683. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder JS, Hinrichs C, Van der Meer WGJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Kruithof JC. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction. Biofouling. 2009;25:543–555. doi: 10.1080/08927010902972225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaning Procedures for DOW FILMTEC FT30 Elements, Catalog Number 609-23010-0211, Dow Filmtec Membranes
   Google Scholar
• Chen V, Fane AG, Fell CJD. The use of anionic surfactants for reducing fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: their effects and optimization. J Membr Sci. 1992;67:249–261. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80028-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Amoudi A, Williams P, Al-Hobaib AS, Lovitt RW. Cleaning results of new and fouled nanofiltration membrane characterized by contact angle, updated DSPM, flux and salts rejection. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254:3983–3992. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.12.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussu K, Belpaire, A, Volodin, A, et al. Influence of membrane and colloid characteristics on fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 2007;289:220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe N, Shirakawa T, Iwahashi M, Seimiya T. Effect of surface charge on adsorption of bovine serum albumin 2. Interaction of protein molecules with an anionic monolayer, as studied by ellipsometry, radiotracer and surface tension measurements. Colloid Polym Sci. 1988;266:254–260. doi: 10.1007/BF01452588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim AL, Bai R. Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. J Membr Sci. 2003;216:279–290. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00083-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar