A simulation study of the energy-efficient options for upgrading and retrofitting a medium-size municipal wastewater treatment plant

References

• Shen Y, Linville JL, Urgun-Demirtas M, et al. An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2015;50:346–362. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton PM, Rittmann BE, Schraa OJ, et al. Wastewater as a resource: a unique approach to achieving energy sustainability. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63:2004–2009. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauseef SM, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Energy recovery from wastewaters with high-rate anaerobic digesters. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2013;19:704–741. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjerstadius H, Haghighatafshar S, Davidsson Å. Potential for nutrient recovery and biogas production from blackwater, food waste and greywater in urban source control systems. Environ Technol. 2015;36:1707–1720. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1007089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt H, van Loosdrecht MCM, Gernaey KV, Sin G. Optimal WWTP process selection for treatment of domestic wastewater – a realistic full-scale retrofitting study. Chem Eng J. 2016;286:447–458. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brepols C, Dorgeloh E, Frechen FB, et al. Upgrading and retrofitting of municipal wastewater treatment plants by means of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. Desalination. 2008;231:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Hiasa H, Talat M, Matsuo T. Direct solid liquid separations using hollow fiber membranes in activated sludge aeration tank. Water Sci Technol. 1989; 21:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisson H, Cote P, Praderie M, Paillard H. The use of immersed membranes for upgrading wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol. 1998;37:89–95. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00275-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Cicek N, Ilg J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci. 2006;270:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz O, Vera L, González E, et al. Effect of sludge characteristics on membrane fouling during start-up of a tertiary submerged membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016: [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melina T, Jefferson B, Bixio D, et al. Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination. 2006;187:271–282. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos A, Ma W, Judd SJ. Membrane bioreactors: two decades of research and implementation. Desalination. 2011;273:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikosz J. Wastewater management in small communities in Poland. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;51:2461–2466. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.747646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretel Jolis P. Environmental and economic sustainability of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating urban wastewater [dissertation]. València: Universitat Politècnica de València; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jenicek P, Bartacek J, Kutil J, et al. Potentials and limits of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: energy self-sufficient municipal wastewater treatment plant? Water Sci Technol. 2012;66:1277–1281. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak O, Keil S, Fimml C. Examples of energy self-sufficient municipal nutrient removal plants. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64:1–6. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wett B, Buchauer K, Fimml C. Energy self-sufficiency as a feasible concept for wastewater treatment systems. Paper presented at: IWA Leading Edge Technology Conference, Asian Water; 2007 Sept 21–24; Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Reardon DJ, Kwan P, et al. Evaluation of the dynamic energy consumption of advanced water and wastewater treatment technologies. Denver, CO: Awwa Research Foundation; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk-Juśko A, Marczuk A, Dach J, et al. Thermochemical and biochemical maize biomass conversion for power engineering. Przem Chem. 2015;94:178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton PM. Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: applicability and selection of optimal system configuration. Paper presented at: Water Environment Federation's 79th Annual Technical Conference on Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment WEFTEC. 2006 Oct 21–25; Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hamouda MA, Anderson WB, Huck PM. Decision support systems in water and wastewater treatment process selection and design: a review. Water Sci Technol. 2009;60:1757–1770. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramenko Y, Kamami M, Kraslawski A. Fuzzy performance indicators for decision making in selection of wastewater treatment methods. In: Pierucci S, Buzzi Ferraris G, editors. Computer aided chemical engineering. 2010;28:127–132. doi: 10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28022-7
   Google Scholar
• Karimi AR, Mehrdadi N, Hashemian SJ, et al. Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2011;8:267–280. doi: 10.1007/BF03326215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR. Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. J Environ Manage. 2012;113:158–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcerzak W, Generowicz A, Mucha Z. Application of multi-criteria analysis for selection of a reclamation method for a hazardous waste landfill. Pol J Environ Stud. 2014;23:983–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langergraber G, Rieger L, Winkler S, et al. A guideline for simulation studies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol. 2004;50:131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikosz J. Determination of permissible industrial pollution load at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2015;12:827–836. doi: 10.1007/s13762-013-0472-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarróna S, Dalmau M, Porro J, et al. Optimization of full-scale membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment through a model-based approach. Chem Eng J. 2015;267:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikosz J, Mucha Z. Validation of design assumptions for small wastewater treatment plant modernization in line with new interpretation of legal requirements. Ochr Sr. 2014;36:45–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf & Eddy. Wastewater engineering, treatment and reuse. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Xu S, Hultman B. Experiences in wastewater characterization and model calibration for the activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol. 1996;33:89–98. doi: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00462-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GPS-X version 6.1. Technical reference. Hamilton, Ontario: Hydromantis Inc.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, et al. Activated sludge model No. 2D, ASM2D. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39:165–182. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00829-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun R, Kühni M, Siegrist H, et al. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters – systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002;36:4113–4127. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00104-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Usach F, Ribes J, Ferrer J, et al. Calibration of denitrifying activity of polyphosphate accumulating organisms in an extended ASM2d model. Water Res. 2010;44:5284–5297. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sin G, Van Hulle SWH, De Pauw DJW, et al. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: A SWOT analysis. Water Res. 2009; 39:2459–2474. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar