Evaluation of direct membrane filtration and direct forward osmosis as concepts for compact and energy-positive municipal wastewater treatment

References

• Hey T, Väänänen J, Heinen N, et al. Potential of combining mechanical and physicochemical municipal wastewater pre-treatment with direct membrane filtration. Environ Technol. 2017;1:108–115. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1186746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler R, MacCormick T. Opportunities for decentralized treatment, sewer mining and effluent re-use. Desalination. 1996;106:273–283. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(96)00119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze M. Trends in advanced wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35:1–4. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)88229-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loosdrecht MCM, Brdjanovic D. Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment. Science. 2014;344:1452–1453. doi: 10.1126/science.1255183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravazzini AM, Van Nieuwenhuijzen AF, Van der Graaf JHMJ. Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent. Desalination. 2005;178:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravazzini AM, Van Nieuwenhuijzen A, Van der Graaf J. Direct membrane filtration of wastewater. In: AF van Nieuwenhuijzen, JHMJ van der Graafs, editors. Handbook on particle separation processes. London: IWA Publishing; 2011. p. 193–211.
   Google Scholar
• Juby GJG, Sethi S, Jindal A, et al. Demonstration Testing of Microfiltration for Microbial Reduction for Ocean Discharge. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (WEFTEC); Alexandria: Water Environment Federation; 2003. p. 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Abdessemed D, Nezzal G. Treatment of primary effluent by coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for reuse. Desalination. 2003;152:367–373. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01085-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn KH, Song J, Cha H. Application of tubular ceramic membranes for reuse of wastewater from buildings. Water Sci Technol. 1998;38:373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn KH, Song KG. Application of microfiltration with a novel fouling control method for reuse of wastewater from a large-scale resort complex. Desalination. 2000;129:207–216. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn KH, Song KG, Yeom IT, et al. Performance comparison of direct membrane separation and membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment and water reuse. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply. 2001;1:315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Z, Gong H, Wang K. Application of hybrid coagulation microfiltration with air backflushing to direct sewage concentration for organic matter recovery. J Hazard Mater. 2015;283:824–831. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juby GJG. Direct microfiltration of primary effluent. 2013. In: AMTA/AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Juby GJG, Sethi S, Deshmukh SS et al. Results from initial testing of the integrated membrane anaerobic stabilization (IMANSTM) process for wastewater treatment and water reclamation. 2000. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (WEFTEC), 2000 Oct 14–18; Anaheim (CA); p. 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Kolega M, Grohmann G, Chiew R, et al. Disinfection and clarification of treated sewage by advanced microfiltration. Water Sci Technol. 1991;23:1609–1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramon G, Green M, Semiat R, et al. Low strength graywater characterization and treatment by direct membrane filtration. Desalination. 2004;170:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.02.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi S, Juby G. Microfiltration of primary effluent for clarification and microbial removal. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;19:467–475.
   Google Scholar
• Water framework directive 2008/105/EC. 2008. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=URISERV:l28180&from=SV
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zheng J, Tang J, et al. A pilot-scale forward osmosis membrane system for concentrating low-strength municipal wastewater: performance and implications. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey T, Zarebska A, Vogel J, et al. Influences of mechanical pre-treatment on the non-biological treatment of municipal wastewater by forward osmosis. Environ Technol. 2016. doi:10.1080/09593330.2016.1256440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cath TY, Hancock NT, Lundin CD, et al. A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J Memb Sci. 2010;362:417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock NT, Xu P, Heil DM, et al. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:8483–8490. doi: 10.1021/es201654k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer DL, Werber JR, Jaramillo H, et al. Forward osmosis: where are we now?Desalination. 2015;356:271–284. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickenbottom KL, Vanneste J, Cath Y. Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine. J Memb Sci. 2016;504:162–175. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiewwijit R. New wastewater treatment concepts towards energy saving and resource recovery [ PhD thesis]. Wageningen (NL): Wageningen University. 2016. (2016) ISBN 978-94-6257-640-7.
   Google Scholar
• Henze M, Harremoës P, la Cour Jansen J, et al. Wastewater treatment: biological and chemical processes. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tchobanoglous G, Burton F, Stensel H. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. Dubuque (IA): McGraw-Hill; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• VA SYD. Miljörapport för Källby avloppsreningsverk 2014. 2015. (Environmental report for the Källby wastewater treatment plant 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Branner W. Rohrechengutanfall und rechengutentsorgungswege in deutschland (amount of and disposal paths for Raw screenings in Germany). KA – Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall. 2013;4:310–315.
   Google Scholar
• ATV-Arbeitsgruppe 2.5.1 Sandabscheideanlagen (Sandfänge und Sandfanggutaufbereitungsanlagen): Arbeitsbericht der ATV-Arbeitsgruppe 2.5.1 “Sandfänge” im ATV-Fachausschuß 2.5 Absetzverfahren. KA Korrespondenz Abwasser. 1998;3:535–543.
   Google Scholar
• Balmér P, Hellström D. Nyckeltal för reningsverk – verktyg för effektivare resursanvändning (performance indicators – a powerful tool for efficient resource utilization). 2011. Svenskt Vatten.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes W. Handbook of chemistry and physics. 96th ed Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hey T, Bajraktari N, Vogel J et al. The effects of physicochemical pre-treatment of municipal wastewater on forward osmosis. Environ Technol. 2017. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, et al. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci. 2012;396:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, et al. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination. 2014;333:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PORIFERA. Available from: http://porifera.com/products/pfo-elements/
   Google Scholar
• Desormeaux E. Process commercialization landscape for forward osmosis. 2015. Available from: http://www.desaltech2015.com/assets/presenters/Desormeaux_Erik.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Desormeaux E, Benton C. A new paradigm: Why FO+RO is the ideal process for potable and high purity water reuse. 2015. In: The International Desalination Association World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse 2015/San Diego, CA, USA. REF: IDAWC15- Desormeaux_51734.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Tang J, Zhu C, et al. Chemical cleaning protocols for thin film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes used for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci. 2015;475:184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani A, Jacangelo JG. Treatment technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate volume minimization: a review. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;122:472–489. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand E, Achilli A, Hiibel S. A low-energy wastewater treatment process for producing high quality reuse water. 2015. Available from: https://www.watereuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Low-Energy-Treatment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, et al. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2004;24:393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Hyaric R, Canler JP, Barillon B, et al. Characterization of screenings from three municipal wastewater treatment plants in the region rhône-alpes. Water Sci Technol. 2009;60:525–531. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmér P. Benchmarking och nyckeltal vid avloppsreningsverk [ Benchmarking and performance indicators for wastewater treatment plants]. Stockholm: Svenskt Vatten; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Remy C, Boulestreau M, Lesjean B. Proof of concept for a new energy-positive wastewater treatment scheme. Water Sci Technol. 2014;70:1709–1716. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy C. Personal communication, 5 July 2016. Dr.-Ing. Christian Remy, Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin Wasser Berlin GmbH, Cicerostrasse 24, 10709 Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lepparanta M, Myrberg K. Physical oceanography of the Baltic Sea. Berlin: Springer Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Wang YN, Li W, et al. Characterization of internal and external concentration polarizations during forward osmosis processes. Desalination. 2014;338:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl Energy. 2010;87:3305–3321. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan J, Gu J, Zhao Q, et al. COD capture: a feasible option towards energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25054. doi: 10.1038/srep25054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S, Shemer H, Semiat R. Energy and environmental issues in desalination. Desalination. 2015;366:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oren A. Saltern evaporation ponds as model systems for the study of primary production processes under hypersaline conditions. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2009;56:193–204. doi: 10.3354/ame01297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre O, Habouzit F, Bru V, et al. Treatment of hypersaline industrial wastewater by a microbial consortium in a sequencing batch reactor. Environ Technol. 2004;25:543–553. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2004.9619345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Ling M, Chung TS. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci. 2013;442:225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen KS, Höjerslev NK. Long-term temperature and salinity records from the baltic Sea transition zone. Boreal Environ Res. 2009;14:125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, She Q, Chang VWC, et al. Mining nutrients (N, K, P) from urban source-separated urine by forward osmosis dewatering. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:3386–3394. doi: 10.1021/es405266d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares Linares R, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, et al. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. Water Res. 2011;45:6737–6744. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water framework directive 2000/60/EC. 2000. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060&from=SV
   Google Scholar
• Anonym. Dutch action plan on sustainable plant protection. Ares (2012) 1424565. Available from: http://c-ipm.org/fileadmin/c-ipm.org/Dutch_NAP__in_EN_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beerlinge E. EU: Zero emission of nutrients and pesticides; work on water footprint. 2013. Available from: http://www.hortidaily.com/article/3970/EU-Zero-emission-of-nutrients-and-pesticides;-work-on-water-footprint
   Google Scholar
• Madsen HT, Bajraktari N, Hélix-Nielsen C, et al. Use of biomimetic forward osmosis membrane for trace organics removal. J Membr Sci. 2015;476:469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar