Effects of perlite and caustic soda on microorganism activities of leachate in a sequence batch reactor

References

• Renou S, Givaudan J, Poulain S, et al. Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150(3):468–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke BO, Anumol T, Barlaz M, et al. Investigating landfill leachate as a source of trace organic pollutants. Chemosphere. 2015;127:269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Vahala R, Wang Y, et al. Microbes in biological processes for municipal landfill leachate treatment: community, function and interaction. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2016;113:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Wabel M, Al Yehya W, AL-Farraj AS, et al. Characteristics of landfill leachates and bio-solids of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2011;10(2):65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Abdallaa KZ, Hammamb G. Correlation between biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand for various wastewater treatment plants in Egypt to obtain the biodegradability indices. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. 2014;13(1):42.
   Google Scholar
• Mojiri A, Aziz HA, Zaman NQ, et al. Powdered ZELIAC augmented sequencing batch reactors (SBR) process for co-treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2014;139:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabroudi SC, Morita DM, Alem P. Landfill leachate treatment over nitritation/denitritation in an activated sludge sequencing batch reactor. APCBEE Procedia. 2013;5:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2013.05.029
   Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Ji M, Li R, et al. Organic and nitrogen removal from landfill leachate in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Waste Manage. 2012;32(3):448–455. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monclús H, Puig S, Coma M, et al. Nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using the SBR technology. Environ Technol. 2009;30(3):283–290. doi: 10.1080/09593330802622105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao L, Wang K, Wang S, et al. Advanced nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using real-time controlled three-stage sequence batch reactor (SBR) system. Bioresour Technol. 2014;159:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagni A, Marsili-Libelli S. Nitrogen removal via nitrite in a sequencing batch reactor treating sanitary landfill leachate. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):609–614. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagni A, Marsili-Libelli S, Lavagnolo MC. Optimisation of sanitary landfill leachate treatment in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(2):337. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abood AR, Bao J, Du J, et al. Non-biodegradable landfill leachate treatment by combined process of agitation, coagulation, SBR and filtration. Waste Manage. 2014;34(2):439–447. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen N, Luonsi A, Vilen J. Landfill leachate treatment with sequencing batch reactor and membrane bioreactor. Desalination. 2006;191(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morling S. Nitrogen removal and heavy metals in leachate treatment using SBR technology. J Hazard Mater. 2010;174(1):679–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neczaj E, Kacprzak M, Kamizela T, et al. Sequencing batch reactor system for the co-treatment of landfill leachate and dairy wastewater. Desalination. 2008;222(1):404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rekabi WS, Qiang H, Qiang WW. Review on sequencing batch reactors. Pak J Nutr. 2007;6(1):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mahvi A. Sequencing batch reactor: a promising technology in wastewater treatment. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2008;5(2):79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray NF. Biology of wastewater treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Aghamohammadi N, Aziz H, Isa M, et al. Powdered activated carbon augmented activated sludge process for treatment of semi-aerobic landfill leachate using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(18):3570–3578. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim PE, Lim SP, Seng CE, et al. Treatment of landfill leachate in sequencing batch reactor supplemented with activated rice husk as adsorbent. Chem Eng J. 2010;159(1):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.02.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, He C, Liu X, et al. Removal of perfluorinated compounds by membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon (PAC): adsorption onto sludge and PAC. Desalination. 2014;334(1):23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Hu QY, Li M, et al. Evaluating the removal of organic fraction of commingled chemical industrial wastewater by activated sludge process augmented with powdered activated carbon. Arab J Chem. 2015;9:1951–1961. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammaro M, Salluzzo A, Perfetto R, et al. A comparative evaluation of biological activated carbon and activated sludge processes for the treatment of tannery wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng. 2014;2(3):1445–1455. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater. Water Res. 2009;43(6):1577–1588. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu QY, Li M, Wang C, et al. Influence of powdered activated carbon addition on water quality, sludge properties, and microbial characteristics in the biological treatment of commingled industrial wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2015;295:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asude A, Koklu R, Ozer C. The adsorption of dye removal from textile industry wastewater with natural adsorbents. J Selcuk Univ Nat Appl Sci. 2014;275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Peyravi M, Jahanshahi M, Alimoradi M, et al. Old landfill leachate treatment through multistage process: membrane adsorption bioreactor and nanofitration. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016;39(12):1803–1816. doi: 10.1007/s00449-016-1655-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakat M. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem. 2011;4(4):361–377. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur C, Dembla A, Srivastava VC, et al. Removal of 4-chlorophenol in sequencing batch reactor with and without granular-activated carbon. Desalin Water Treat. 2014;52:4404–4412. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.803684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong L, Xiong Y, Tian S, et al. Preparation and characterization of a hierarchical porous char from sewage sludge with superior adsorption capacity for toluene by a new two-step pore-fabricating process. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:457–462. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze M. Characterization of functional microorganism groups and substrate in activated sludge and wastewater by AUR, NUR and OUR. Interactions of wastewater, biomass and reactor configurations in biological treatment plants. Proceedings of the IAWPRC Specialised Seminar Held in Copenhagen; 1991 Aug 21–23; Denmark, Pergamon; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, et al. APHA: standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Centennial ed. Washington (DC): APHA, AWWA, WEF; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lübbecke S, Vogelpohl A, Dewjanin W. Wastewater treatment in a biological high-performance system with high biomass concentration. Water Res. 1995;29(3):793–802. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00215-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas M, Dursun S, Argun ME. Methane production from anaerobic–aerobic sequential system treatment of Azo Dye Reactive Red 24. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2011;30(1):50–58. doi: 10.1002/ep.10449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensink J, Donker H. The effect of contact tank operation on bulking sludge and biosorption processes. Water Sci Technol. 1991;23(4–6):857–866. doi: 10.2166/wst.1991.0537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm JC, Jenkins D, Parker DS. Relationship between organic loading, dissolved oxygen concentration and sludge settleability in the completely-mixed activated sludge process. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1980;52:2484–2506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT. Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking, foaming, and other solids separation problems. New York: Lewis Publishers c/o CRC, copublished with IWA Publishing London; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Atlas RM. Principles of microbiology. Dubuque, IA: William C Brown Pub; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lobos J, Wisniewski C, Heran M, et al. Effects of starvation conditions on biomass behaviour for minimization of sludge production in membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol. 2005;51(6–7):35–44. doi: 10.2166/wst.2005.0619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobos J, Wisniewski C, Heran M, et al. Sequencing versus continuous membrane bioreactors: effect of substrate to biomass ratio (F/M) on process performance. J Memb Sci. 2008;317(1):71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdel F. Theory and measurement of bacterial growth. Di dalam Grundpraktikum Mikrobiologie. 2007;4:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Guo JS, Abbas AA, Chen YP, et al. Treatment of landfill leachate using a combined stripping, Fenton, SBR, and coagulation process. J Hazard Mater. 2010;178:699–705. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZC, Gao MC, Ren Y, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on performance of an anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor treating saline wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12:2043–2054. doi: 10.1007/s13762-014-0594-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim PE, Ong SA, Seng CE. Simultaneous adsorption and biodegradation processes in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for treating copper and cadmium-containing wastewater. Water Res. 2002;36:667–675. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00257-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SA, Toorisaka E, Hirata M, et al. Adsorption and toxicity of heavy metals on activated sludge. Sci Asia. 2010;36:204–209. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2010.36.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SA, Lim PE, Seng CE. Effects of adsorbents and copper(II) on activated sludge microorganisms and sequencing batch reactor treatment process. J Hazard Mater. 2003;103(3):263–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li X, Zhang Q, et al. New insight into the biological treatment by activated sludge: the role of adsorption process. Bioresour Technol. 2014;153:160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delavar M, Ghoreyshi A, Jahanshahi M, et al. Equilibria and kinetics of natural gas adsorption on multi-walled carbon nanotube material. RSC Adv. 2012;2(10):4490–4497. doi: 10.1039/c2ra01095j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili S, Ghoreyshi A, Jahanshahi M. Carbon dioxide captured by multi-walled carbon nanotube and activated charcoal: a comparative study. Chem Indus Chem Eng Quarterly. 2013;19(1):153–164. doi: 10.2298/CICEQ120217050K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar