SBR treatment of tank truck cleaning wastewater: sludge characteristics, chemical and ecotoxicological effluent quality

References

• Mace S, Mata-Alvarez J. Utilization of SBR technology for wastewater treatment: an overview. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(23):5539–5553. doi: 10.1021/ie0201821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilderer P, Irvine R, Goronszy M. Sequencing batch reactor technology. IWA Scientific and Technical Report Series. London: IWA Publishing; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dries J. Dynamic control of nutrient-removal from industrial wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), using common and low-cost online sensors. Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(4):740–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins LN, Lant P, Newell RB. Using the flexibility index to compare batch and continuous activated sludge processes. Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(3):35–43. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy DP, Efendiev S, White DM. A comparison of CSTR and SBR bioslurry reactor performance. Water Res. 2000;34(18):4333–4342. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00211-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockhorn T, Dichtl N, Kayser R. Comparative investigations on COD-removal in sequencing batch reactors and continuous flow plants. Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(3):45–52. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J, Wiese J, Steinmetz H. A comparison of continuous flow and sequencing batch reactor plants concerning integrated operation of sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol. 2006;54(11–12):241–248. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Andrade I, Buitrón G. Variation of the microbial activity during the acclimation phase of SBR system degrading 4-chlorophenol. Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(10):251–258. doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Liu J, Bai R, et al. Biodegradation of organonitriles by adapted activated sludge consortium with acetonitrile-degrading microorganisms. Water Res. 2007;41(15):3465–3473. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou C, Samaras P, Sakellaropoulos GP. Comparative study of phenol and cyanide containing wastewater in CSTR and SBR activated sludge reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrijos M, Moletta R. Winery wastewater depollution by sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(1):249–257. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudoba J, Ottova V, Madera V. Control of activated sludge filamentous bulking—I. Effect of the hydraulic regime or degree of mixing in an aeration tank. Water Res. 1973;7(8):1163–1182. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90070-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudoba J, Grau P, Ottová V. Control of activated-sludge filamentous bulking–II. Selection of microorganisms by means of a selector. Water Res. 1973;7(10):1389–1406. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90113-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudoba J, Dohanyos M, Grau P. Control of activated sludge filamentous bulking—III. Effect of sludge loading. Water Res. 1974;8:231–237. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(74)90160-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtmeyers J, van den Eynde E, Poffé R. Relations between substrate feeding pattern and development of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge processes. Part I: influence of process parameters. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1980;9:63–77. doi: 10.1007/BF00500004
   Google Scholar
• Verachtert H, Van den Eynde E, Poffé R, et al. Relations between substrate feeding pattern and development of filamentous Bacteria in activated sludge processes : part II. Influence of substrates present in the influent. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1980;9:137–149. doi: 10.1007/BF00503510
   Google Scholar
• Van den Eynde E, Vriens L, Verachtert H. Relation between substrate feeding pattern and development of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge processes: part III. Applications with industrial waste waters. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1982;15(4):246–251. doi: 10.1007/BF00499965
   Google Scholar
• Caluwé M, Dobbeleers T, Daens D, et al. The effect of the feeding pattern of complex industrial wastewater on activated sludge characteristics and the chemical and ecotoxicological effluent quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:10796–10807. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8712-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiĝgin AS, Rossetti S, Majone M. Effect of feeding and sludge age on acclimated bacterial community and fate of slowly biodegradable substrate. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(17):7794–7801. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubas FJ, Novak JT, Higgins MJ. Effect of feeding patterns on the performance of activated sludge systems. Water Environ Res. 2011;507–514.
   Google Scholar
• Martins AMP, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM. Effect of feeding pattern and storage on the sludge settleability under aerobic conditions. Water Res. 2003;37(11):2555–2570. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00070-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling L, Lo KV. Brewery wastewater treatment using suspended and attached growth sequencing batch reactors. J Environ Sci Heal Part A. 1999;34(2):341–355. doi: 10.1080/10934529909376840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollerer J, Wilderer PA. Biological treatment of leachates from hazardous waste landfills using SBBR technology. Water Sci Technol. 1996;34:437–444. doi: 10.2166/wst.1996.0652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh R, Balaji G, Ramanujam R. Biodegradation of tannery wastewater using sequencing batch reactor – respirometric assessment. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97(15):1815–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franta JR, Wilderer PA. Biological treatment of papermill wastewater by sequencing batch reactor technology to reduce residual organics. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(1):129–136. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns MR. Developments in wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry: a review. Bioresour Technol. 1996;8524(95):203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Zilverentant AG. Pilot-testing, design and full-scale experience of a sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of the potentially toxic waste water from a road and rail car cleaning site. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(1):259–267. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Gu S, Peng Y, et al. Progress in the development of control strategies for the SBR process. Clean Soil Air Water. 2010;38:732–749. doi: 10.1002/clen.201000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schepper W, Dries J, Geuens L, et al. Wastewater treatment plant modeling supported toxicity identification and evaluation of a tank truck cleaning effluent. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73(5):702–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckenfelder W, Ford D, Englande A. Industrial water quality. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009, 920 p.
   Google Scholar
• De Schepper W, Dries J, Geuens L, et al. Conventional and (eco) toxicological assessment of batch partial ozone oxidation and subsequent biological treatment of a tank truck cleaning generated concentrate. Water Res. 2009;43(16):4037–4049. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries J, De Schepper W, Geuens L, et al. Removal of ecotoxicity and COD from tank truck cleaning wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(10):2202–2207. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries J, Daens D, Geuens L, et al. Evaluation of acute ecotoxicity removal from industrial wastewater using a battery of rapid bioassays. Water Sci Technol. 2014;70:2056–2061. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD guideline 201. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, freshwater alga and Cyanobacteria, growth inhibition test. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• OECD guideline 202. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals, Daphnia acute immobilisation test. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 11348-3. Water quality – determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test) – Part 3: Method using freeze-dried bacteria. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Adav SS, Lee D-J, Show K-Y, et al. Aerobic granular sludge: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(5):411–423. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caluwé M, Daens D, Blust R, et al. The sequencing batch reactor as an excellent configuration to treat wastewater from the petrochemical industry. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75(4):793–801. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck R, Van Impe JFM, Smets IYM. Assessment of activated sludge stability in lab-scale experiments. J Biotechnol. 2009;141(11):147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciğgin AS, Karahan O, Orhon D. Effect of feeding pattern on biochemical storage by activated sludge under anoxic conditions. Water Res. 2007;41(4):924–934. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caluwé M, Dobbeleers T, D’aes J, et al. Formation of aerobic granular sludge during the treatment of petrochemical wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:559–567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pambrun V, Paul E, Spérandio M. Control and modelling of partial nitrification of effluents with high ammonia concentrations in sequencing batch reactor. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2008;47(3):323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola A, Vargas M, Marcelino M, et al. On-line monitoring of the enhanced biological phosphorus removal process using respirometry and titrimetry. Biochem Eng J. 2007;35(3):371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartiser S, Hafner C, Hercher C, et al. Whole effluent assessment of industrial wastewater for determination of BAT compliance. Part 2: metal surface treatment industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2010;17(5):1149–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0290-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar