Nitrifying bio-cord reactor: performance optimization and effects of substratum and air scouring

References

• Novotny V. Water centric sustainable communities: planning, retrofitting, and building the next urban environment. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Elshafie A, Zain S, Suja F, et al. Biological aerated filters (BAFs) for carbon and nitrogen removal: a review. J Eng Sci Technol. 2012;7:428–446.
   Google Scholar
• EEC. Council directive concerning urban waste-water treatment. OJEC. 1991;135:40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gazette C. Wastewater systems effluent regulations, Part II. July 18. 2012;145(15).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). State development for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Washington, DC. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hamoda MF, Al-Ghusain I, Al-Jasem DM. Application of granular Media filtration in wastewater reclamation and reuse. J Environ SciHealth, Part A. 2004;39:385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loupasaki E, Diamadopoulos E. Attached growth systems for wastewater treatment in small and rural communities: a review. J Chem Technol Bio-Technol. 2013;88:190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water Environment Federation (WEF). Design of municipal wastewater treatment plants: WEF manual of practice no. 8. 5th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Randall C, Sen D, Franz A, et al. Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal. Water Sci Technol. 1996;33(12):155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Sen D. COD removal, nitrification and denitrification kinetics and mathematical modeling of an integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) system [Ph.D. dissertation]. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G-F, Feng L-J, Yang Q, et al. Startup pattern and performance enhancement of pilot-scale biofilm process for raw water pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L-J, Xu J, Xu X-Y, et al. Enhanced biological nitrogen removal via dissolved oxygen partitioning and step feeding in a simulated river bioreactor for contaminated source water remediation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2012;71:72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Qian X, Zhang R, et al. Performance and microbial community analysis of a novel bio- cord carrier during treatment of a polluted river. Bioresour Technol. 2012;117:33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, and Eddy. Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recover. 5th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X-Y, Feng L-J, Zhu L, et al. Biofilm formation and microbial community analysis of the simulated river bioreactor for contaminated source water remediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2012;19:1584–1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Yang G, Zhu L, et al. Enhancement removal of endocrine-disrupting pesticides and nitrogen removal in a biofilm reactor coupling of biodegradable Phragmites communis and elastic filler for polluted source water treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2015;187:331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H, Gisvold B, Strickland J. The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 2000;41:383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aygun A, Nas B, Berktay A. Influence of high organic loading rates on COD removal and sludge production in moving Bed biofilm reactor. Environ Eng Sci. 2008;25:1311–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovic I, Leiknes T, Ødegaard H. Influence of loading rates on production and characteristics of retentate from a biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination. 2006;199:490–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delatolla R, Tufenkji N, Comeau Y, et al. Effects of long exposure to low temperatures on nitrifying biofilm and biomass in wastewater treatment. Water Environ. Res. 2012;84:328–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, et al. Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4(+)-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water. Bioresour Technol. 2013;131:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karizmeh M, Delatolla R, Narbaitz R. Investigation of settleability of biologically produced solids and biofilm morphology in moving bed bioreactors (MBBRs). Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014;37:1839–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest D, Delatolla R, Kennedy K. Carrier effects on tertiary nitrifying moving Bed biofilm reactor: an examination of performance, biofilm and biologically produced solids. Environ Technol. 2016;37(6):662–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young B, Banihashemi B, Forrest D, et al. Meso and micro-scale response of post carbon removal nitrifying MBBR biofilm across carrier type and loading. Water Research. 2016;91:235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupančič M, Novak D, Diaci J, et al. An evaluation of industrial ultrafiltration systems for surface water using fouling indices as a performance indicator. Desalination. 2014;344:321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delatolla R, Tufenkji N, Comeau Y, et al. Kinetic analysis of attached growth nitrification in cold climates. Water Sci Technol. 2009;60:1173–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V, Delatolla R, Laflamme E, et al. An investigation of moving bed biofilm reactor nitrification during long-term exposure to cold temperatures. Water Environ Res. 2014;86:36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young B, Delatolla R, Kennedy K, et al. Low temperature MBBR nitrification: microbiome analysis. Water Research. 2017;111:224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young B, Delatolla R, Ren B, et al. Pilot scale tertiary MBBR nitrification at 1°C: characterization of ammonia removal rate, solids settleability and biofilm characteristics. Environ Technol. 2016; 37(16):2124–2132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53:17–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenter D, Milferstedt K, Zhang W, et al. Influence of detachment on substrate removal and microbial ecology in a heterotrophic/autotrophic biofilm. Water Research. 2007;41:4657–4671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orantes JC, Gonzalez-Martinez S. A new low-cost biofilm carrier for the treatment of municipal wastewater in a moving bed reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2003;48:243–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tijhuis L, Hijman B, Loosdrecht M, et al. Influence of detachment, substrate loading and reactor scale on the formation of biofilms in airlift reactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;45:7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG. Biofilm processes. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC, editor. Biofilms. New York: Wiley; 1990. p. 195–231.
   Google Scholar
• Peyton BM, Characklis WG. A statistical analysis of the effect of substrate utilization and shear stress on the kinetics of biofilm detachment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1993;41:728–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MC, Heijnen JJ. Two- dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001;72:205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telgmann U, Horn H, Morgenroth E. Influence of growth history on sloughing and erosion from biofilms. Water Res. 2004;38:3671–3684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok W, Picioreanu C, Ong S, et al. Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;58:400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar