Assessing the performance and microbial community of hybrid moving bed and conventional membrane bioreactors treating municipal wastewater

References

• Metcalf E. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Belli TJ, Bernardelli JKB, Amaral PAP, et al. Biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;55(6):1654–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas F, Temudo FM, Carvalho G, et al. Robustness of sludge enriched with short SBR cycles for biological nutrient removal. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:1969–1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hascoet MC, Florentz M. Influence of nitrates on biological phosphorus removal from wastewater. Water SA. 1985;11(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Yang F, Fu Z, et al. Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal by a novel sequencing batch moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2010;175:551–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H. The moving bed biofilm reactor. In: Igarashi T, Watanabe Y, Asano T, Tambo N, editors. Water environmental engineering and reuse of water. Trondheim, Norway: Hokkaido Press; 1999. p. 250–305.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang XC, Yuan H, et al. Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2010;258:143–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Hernández L, Esteban-García AL, Tejero I. Comparison between a fixed bed hybrid membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: A pilot-scale study. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Syed W, Zhou H. Comparative study on membrane fouling between membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor and conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Wat Sci Technol. 2014;69(5):1021–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovic I, Leiknes T, Ødegaard H. Fouling control by reduction of submicron particles in a BF-MBR with an integrated flocculation zone in the membrane reactor. Sep Sci Technol. 2008;43(7):1871–1883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo HH, et al. Removal and fate of micropollutants in a sponge-based moving bed bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014;159:311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Pascual J, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Muñio MM, et al. Membrane fouling of a hybrid moving bed membrane bioreactor plant to treat real urban wastewater. Chem Eng Process. 2016;104:112–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Xuejun B, How YNG. Effects of bio-carriers on membrane fouling mitigation in moving bed membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci. 2016;499:134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapani D D, Bella G D, Mannina G, et al. Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: influence of wastewater salinity variation. Bioresour Technol. 2014;162:60–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva-Díaz JC, Munío MM, González-López J, et al. Anaerobic/anoxic/oxic configuration in hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor for nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng. 2016;91:449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C, Yue X, Shi X, et al. Membrane fouling between a membrane bioreactor and a moving Bed membrane bioreactor: effects of solids retention time. Chem Eng J. 2017;309:397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachtmeister A, Kuba T, Van Loosdrecht MCM, et al. A sludge characterization assay for aerobic and denitrifying phosphorus removing sludge. Water Res. 1997;31(3):471–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli TJ, Bernardelli JKB, Bassin JP, et al. Effect of solids retention time on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater in a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor. Environ Technol. 2016;38(7):806–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qian PY, Field D. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(10):7401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber C, Caporaso, JG, Walters WA, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6(8):1621–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr RL, et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28:350–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre T, Lesjean B, Drews A, et al. Monitoring of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and correlation with other fouling indicators. Wat Sci Technol. 2008;58(10):1903–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, et al. Impacts of temperature and nitrifying community on nitrification kinetics in a moving bed biofilm reactor treating polluted raw water. Chem Eng J. 2014;236:242–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassin JP, Dias IN, Cao SMS, et al. Effect of increasing organic loading rates on the performance of moving-bed biofilm reactors filled with different support media: assessing the activity of suspended and attached biomass fractions. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2016;100:131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva-Díaz JC, González-Martínez A, González-López J, et al. Kinetic modeling and microbiological study of two-step nitrification in a membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor–membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2015;259:692–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira R, Melo LF, Purkhold U, et al. Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Res. 2002;36:469–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser JI. Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 1989;30:125–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe S, Hirata K, Ozawa Y, et al. Spatial microbial distributions of nitrifiers and heterotrophs in mixed population biofilms. Botechnol Bioeng. 1996;50:24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53(9):17–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Das A, Beerman D, et al. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Res. 2010;44:3313–3320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehmen A, Zeng RJ, Yuan ZG, et al. Anaerobic metabolism of propionate by polyphosphate-accumulating organisms in enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;91:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieseke A, Arnz P, Amann R, et al. Simultaneous P and N removal in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: insights from reactor and microscale investigations. Water Res. 2002;36:501–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L, Guo W, Ngo HH, et al. New functional biocarriers for enhancing the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor–membrane bioreactor system. Bioresour Technol. 2016;208:87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Ngo HH, Dharmawan F, et al. Roles of polyurethane foam in aerobic moving and fixed bed bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1435–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monclús H, Sipma J, Ferrero G, et al. Biological nutrient removal in an MBR treating municipal wastewater with special focus on biological phosphorus removal. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:3984–3991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuba T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ. Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system. Water Res. 1996;30:1702–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CY, De Wever H, Diels L, et al. Biodiversity and population dynamics of microorganisms in a full-scale membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011;45:1129–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas F, Hehemann JH, Rebuffet E, et al. Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Gómez B, Richter M, Schüler M, et al. Ecology of marine Bacteroidetes: a comparative genomics approach. ISME J. 2013;7(5):1026–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A, Zielińska M. Bacterial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment systems. J Microbiol Biotechnol World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(4):66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang X, Wen X, et al. Microbial community structures in different wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454-pyrosequencing analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2012;117:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliesche CG F, Hirsch P A. Genus Hyphomicrobium Stutzer and Hartleb 1898, 76AL. In: JT Staley, MP Bryant, N Pfennig, JG Holt, editor. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 476–494.
   Google Scholar
• Casale A D, Flanagan PV, Larkin MJ, et al. Analysis of transduction in wastewater bacterial populations by targeting the phage-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;76:100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham WR, Estrela AB, Nikitin DI, et al. Brevundimonas halotolerans sp. nov., Brevundimonas poindexterae sp. nov. and Brevundimonas staleyi sp. nov., prosthecate bacteria from aquatic habitats. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:1837–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang J, Chen Q, et al. Dokdonella kunshanensis sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge, and emended description of the genus Dokdonella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1519–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing W, Li D, Li J, et al. Nitrate removal and microbial analysis by combined micro-electrolysis and autotrophic denitrification. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:240–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh TK. Dokdonella koreensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:145–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim BC, Kim S, Shin T, et al. Comparison of the bacterial communities in anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic chambers of a pilot A2O process using pyrosequencing analysis. Curr Microbiol. 2013;66:555–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassin JP, Winkler MK, Kleerebezem R, et al. Improved phosphate removal by selective sludge discharge in aerobic granular sludge reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(8):1919–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Loy A. Bacterial community composition and function in sewage treatment systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13:218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm A, De Beer D, Gieseke A, et al. Microenvironments and distribution of nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-bound biofilm. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2:680–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Kim SH. Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics. Water Res. 2006;40:887–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete TE, Steyn PL. The role of Acinetobacter as a phosphorus removing agent in activated sludge. Water Res. 1988;22(8):971–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating C, Chin JP, Hughes D, et al. Biological phosphorus removal during high-rate, Low-temperature, anaerobic digestion of wastewater. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HM, Xiao JN, Cheng YJ, et al. Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2006;41:87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd S. The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lim AL, Bai R. Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. J Memb Sci. 2003;216:279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahl RM, Leiknes T, Odegaard H. Tracking particle size distributions in a moving bed biofilm membrane reactor for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53(7):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Leiknes T, Fredriksen HR, et al. Comparison of membrane fi ltration performance between biofi lm-MBR and activated sludge-MBR. Desalin Water Treat. 2012;48:285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Yang F, Fu Z, et al. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:6655–6657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar