Removal of organic matter and ammoniacal nitrogen from landfill leachate using the UV/H₂O₂ photochemical process

References

• Christensen TH, Kjeldsen P. Basic biochemical processes in landfills. In: Christensen TH, Cossu R, Stegmann R, editors. Sanitary landfilling: process, technology and environmental impact. London: Academic Press; 1989. p. 592.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen TH, Kjeldsen P, Bjerg PL, et al. Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes. Appl Geochem. 2001;16:659–718. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00082-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen TH, Kjeldsen P, Albrechtsen H, et al. Attenuation of landfill leachate pollutants in aquifers. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 1994;24:119–202. doi: 10.1080/10643389409388463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Smith DW, El-Din MG. Application of advanced oxidation methods for landfill leachate treatment – a review. J Environ Eng Sci. 2003;2:413–427. doi: 10.1139/s03-058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannarino CF, Moreira JC, Ferreira JA, et al. Avaliação de impactos do efluente do tratamento combinado de lixiviado de aterro de resíduos sólidos urbanos e esgoto doméstico sobre a biota aquática. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013;18:3235–3243. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232013001100014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pivato A, Gaspari L. Acute toxicity test of leachates from traditional and sustainable landfills using luminescent bacteria. Waste Manag. 2006;26:1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassano D, Zapata A, Brunetti G, et al. Comparison of several combined/integrated biological-AOPs setups for the treatment of municipal landfill leachate: minimization of operating costs and effluent toxicity. Chem Eng J. 2011;172:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emenike CU, Fauziah SH, Agamuthu P. Characterization and toxicological evaluation of leachate from closed sanitary landfill. Waste Manag Res. 2012;30:888–897. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12443585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior ABd C, Dalsasso RL, Rohers F. Pré-tratamento de lixiviados de aterros sanitários por filtração direta ascendente e coluna de carvão ativado. Eng Sanit Ambient. 2010;15:385–392. doi: 10.1590/S1413-41522010000400011
   Google Scholar
• Guieysse B, Norvill ZN. Sequential chemical-biological processes for the treatment of industrial wastewaters: review of recent progresses and critical assessment. J Hazard Mater. 2014;267:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oller I, Malato S, Sánchez-Pérez JA. Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination – a review. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:4141–4166. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan TA, Lo WH, Chan GY. Physico-chemical treatments for removal of recalcitrant contaminants from landfill leachate. J Hazard Mater. 2006;129:80–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, et al. Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150:468–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxendale JH, Wilson JA. The photolysis of hydrogen peroxide at high light intensities. Trans Faraday Soc. 1957;53:344–356. doi: 10.1039/tf9575300344
   Google Scholar
• Vianna VB, Tôrres AR, Azevedo EB. Degradação de corantes ácidos por processos oxidativos avançados usando um reator com disco rotatório de baixa velocidade. Quím Nova. 2008;31:1353–1358. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422008000600015
   Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Williams M. Introduction. In: Parsons S, editor. Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment. London: IWA Publishing; 2004. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brito NN, Paterniani JES, Brota GA, et al. Ammonia removal from leachate by photochemical process using H2O2. Ambi-Agua. 2010;5:51–60. doi: 10.4136/ambi-agua.136
   Google Scholar
• Chen YC, Smirniotis P. Enhancement of photocatalytic degradation of phenol and chlorophenols by ultrasound. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:5958–5965. doi: 10.1021/ie020415o
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An T, Gu H, Xiong Y, et al. Decolourization and COD removal from reactive dye-containing wastewater using sonophotocatalytic technology. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2003;78:1142–1148. doi: 10.1002/jctb.915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahamuni NN, Adewuyi YG. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: a review with emphasis on cost estimation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2010;17:990–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer R, Fallmann H. The photo-Fenton oxidation – a cheap and efficient wastewater treatment method. Res Chem Intermed. 1997;23:341–354. doi: 10.1163/156856797X00565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong MN, Sharma AK, Burn S, et al. Feasibility study on the application of advanced oxidation technologies for decentralised wastewater treatment. J Cleaner Prod. 2012;35:230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oloibiri V, Chys M, De Wandel S, et al. Removal of organic matter and ammonium from landfill leachate through different scenarios: operational cost evaluation in a full-scale case study of a Flemish landfill. J Environ Manage. 2017;203:774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Morais JL, Zamora PP. Use of advanced oxidation processes to improve the biodegradability of mature landfill leachates. J Hazard Mater. 2005;123:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo O, Rivero MJ, Ortiz I. Photo-Fenton process as an efficient alternative to the treatment of landfill leachates. J Hazard Mater. 2008;153:834–842. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmizakis P, Tsamoutsoglou C, Kayan B, et al. Subcritical water treatment of landfill leachate: application of response surface methodology. J Environ Manage. 2014;146:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associação dos Municípios da Região da Foz do Rio Itajaí [AMFRI]. Plano municipal de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos da associação dos municípios da região da foz do rio itajaí. Itajaí: Associação dos Municípios da Região da Foz do Rio Itajaí. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association [APHA]. Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira MC, Nogueira RFP, Gomes Neto JAG, et al. Sistema de injeção em fluxo espectrofotométrico para monitorar peróxido de hidrogênio em processo de fotodegradação por reação foto-fenton. Quím Nova. 2001;24:188–190. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422001000200007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YW, Cho MJ, Hwang KY. Correction of hydrogen peroxide interference on standard chemical oxygen demand test. Water Res. 1999;33:1247–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00315-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Test methods for evaluating solid waste. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• de Strelau JRM, de Castilhos AB, dos Madureira LAS. Extration of organic compounds in sanitary landfill leachate and determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rev Ciênc Tecnol. 2009;16:19–30. doi: 10.15600/2238-1252/rct.v16n32p19-30
   Google Scholar
• Nagel-Hassemer ME, Coral LA, Lapolli FR, et al. Processo UV/H2O2 Como pós-tratamento para remoção de cor e polimento final em efluentes têxteis. Quím Nova. 2012;35:900–904. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422012000500007
   Google Scholar
• Córdova RN. Cartagena, Colombia. Proceedings of the Anais Do 59° Congreso Internacional del Agua, Saneamiento, Ambiente y Energías Renovables, Y el XXXV Congreso Interamericano de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental de AIDIS; 2016 Aug 21–24; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• FIGAWA – Associação Federal das Empresas do Setor de Gás e Água da Alemanha. Grupo de trabalho oxidação por via úmida. Comunicado Técnico n. 19; Köln: Figawa; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tuhkanen TA. UV/h2o2. In: Parsons S, editor. Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment. London: IWA Publishing; 2004. p. 86–110.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel AI. Análise química quantitativa / Vogel. [Quantitative chemical analysis]. Afonso JC, Fernandes De Aguiar P, Bicca De Alencastro R, translators. Rio de Janeiro: LTC; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chang R. Físico-química: para as ciências químicas e biológicas [Physical chemistry: for the chemical and biological sciences]. 3rd ed Porto Alegre: AMGH; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil SA. Integrated solid waste management, engineering principles and management issues. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrig HJ. Leachate quality. In: Christensen TH, Cossu R, Stegmann R, editors. Sanitary landfilling: process, technology and environmental impact. London: Academic Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Palmisano AC, Barlaz MA. Microbiology of solid waste. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Al Seadi T, Owen N, Hellström H, et al. Source separation of MSW: an overview of the source separation and separate collection of the digestible fraction of household waste, and other similar wastes from municipalities, aimed to be used as feedstock for anaerobic digestion in biogas plants. IEA Bioenergy Task 37 Energy from Biogas Report; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Campuzano R, González-Martínez S. Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: a review. Waste Manag. 2016;54:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union E. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council, of 19 November 2008, on waste and repealing certain directives. Off J Eur Union. 2008;L 312: 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ormad MP, Mosteo R, Ibarz C, et al. Multivariate approach to the photo-Fenton process applied to the degradation of winery wastewaters. Appl Catal B Environ. 2006;66:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Calado V, Montgomery DC. Planejamento de experimentos usando o statistica [Planning of experiments using statistica]. Rio de Janeiro: E-Papers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson K, Russo RC, Lund RE, et al. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. J Fish Res Bd Can. 1975;32:2379–2383. doi: 10.1139/f75-274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer CN, McCarty PL, Parkin GF. Chemistry for environmental engineering. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks JL, Rabani J. The pulse radiolysis of deaerated carbonate solutions. I. Transient optical spectrum and mechanism. II. pK for OH radicals 1. J Phys Chem. 1966;70:2100–2106. doi: 10.1021/j100879a005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baynes J, Dominiczak MH. Bioquímica médica. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Brasil; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barros M, Nozaki J. Redução de poluentes de efluentes das indústrias de papel e celulose pela floculação/coagulação e degradação fotoquímica. Quím Nova. 2002;25:736–740. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422002000500006
   Google Scholar
• Schulte P, Bayer A, Kuhn F, et al. H2O2/O3, H2O2/UV and H2O2/Fe2+ processes for the oxidation of hazardous wastes. Ozone Sci Eng. 1995;17:119–134. doi: 10.1080/01919519508547541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensen M. Chemical oxidation for the treatment of leachate – process comparison and results from full-scale plants. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35:249–256. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince NH. Light-enhanced chemical oxidation for tertiary treatment of municipal landfill leachate. Water Environ Res. 1998;70:1161–1169. doi: 10.2175/106143098X123282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi TI, Kim HT, Kim YJ. UV-catalytic treatment of municipal solid-waste landfill leachate with hydrogen peroxide and ozone oxidation. Chin J Chem Eng. 2002;10:444–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Suffet IH, MacCarthy P. Introduction. In: Suffet IH, MacCarthy P, American Chemical Society, editors. Aquatic humic substances: influence on fate and treatment of pollutants. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society; 1989. p. 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wershaw RL. The study of humic substances-in search of a paradigm. In: Davies G, Ghabbour EA, Royal Society of Chemistry, editors. Humic substances: versatile components of plants, soil and water. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2000. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moravia WG. Avaliação do tratamento de lixiviado de aterro sanitário através de processo oxidativo avançado conjugado com sistema de separação por membranas. [Dissertation]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton JR, Cater SR. Homogeneous photodegradation of pollutants in contaminated water. In: Helz GR, editor. Surface and aquatic environmental photochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994. p. 467–490.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden JC, Harza MW, Trussell RR, et al. Water treatment: principles and design. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton JR. Ultraviolet applications handbook. Ayr: Bolton Photosciences Inc; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzer M. Chapter 1 humic substances: chemistry and reactions. Dev Soil Sci. 1978;8:1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Abbt-Braun G, Lankes U, Frimmel FH. Structural characterization of aquatic humic substances – the need for a multiple method approach. Aquatic Sci Res Across Bound. 2004;66:151–170. doi: 10.1007/s00027-004-0711-z
   Google Scholar
• Dick DP. Química da matéria orgânica do solo. In: de Melo VF, Alleoni LRF, editors. Química e mineralogia do solo – parte 2 – aplicações. Viçosa: SBCS; 2009. p. 2–67.
   Google Scholar
• Brady NC, Weil RR. Elementos da natureza e propriedades dos solos. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pagsberg PB. Abstracts, 17th Annual Meeting of the Radiation. Cincinnati: Research Society; 1969; and Report 1972, Riso-256, 209.
   Google Scholar
• Hayon E, Simic M. Intermediates produced from the one-electron oxidation of hydrazine. Acid-base properties of the amino, hydroxyamino, and methoxyamino radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:5982–5986. doi: 10.1021/ja00752a005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Li L, Dong W, et al. Removal of ammonia by OH radical in aqueous phase. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:8070–8075. doi: 10.1021/es8008216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Zhao R. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in wastewater treatment. Curr Pollut Rep. 2015;1:167–176. doi: 10.1007/s40726-015-0015-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Song M, Chen B, et al. Effects of pH and H2O2 on ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate transformations during UV254 nm irradiation: implications to nitrogen removal and analysis. Chemosphere. 2017;184:1003–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoigne J, Bader H. Ozonation of water: kinetics of oxidation of ammonia by ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Environ Sci Technol. 1978;12:79–84. doi: 10.1021/es60137a005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar