Storing of exoelectrogenic anolyte for efficient microbial fuel cell recovery

References

• Butti S, Velvizhi G, Sulonen M, et al. Microbial electrochemical technologies with the perspective of harnessing bioenergy: maneuvering towards upscaling. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2016;53:462–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wang X, Logan B, et al. Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2008;78(5):873–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi U, Jin W, Pervez A, et al. Anaerobic microbial fuel cell treating combined industrial wastewater: correlation of electricity generation with pollutants. Bioresour Technol. 2016;200:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkata Mohan S, Velvizhi M, Babu L, et al. Bio-catalyzed electrochemical treatment of real field dairy wastewater with simultaneous power generation. Biochem Eng J. 2010;51(1–2):32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil S, Surakasi V, Koul S, et al. Electricity generation using chocolate industry wastewater and its treatment in activated sludge based microbial fuel cell and analysis of developed microbial community in the anode chamber. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(21):5132–5139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewkannetra P, Chiwes W, Chiu T. Treatment of cassava mill wastewater and production of electricity through microbial fuel cell technology. Fuel. 2011;90(8):2746–2750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannell T, Goud R, Schell D, et al. Effect of fed-batch vs. continuous mode of operation on microbial fuel cell performance treating biorefinery wastewater. Biochem Eng J. 2016;116:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velvizhi G, Venkata Mohan S. Electrogenic activity and electron losses under increasing organic load of recalcitrant pharmaceutical wastewater. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2012;37(7):5969–5978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando E, Keshavarz T, Kyazze G, et al. Treatment of colour industry wastewaters with concomitant bioelectricity production in a sequential stacked mono-chamber microbial fuel cells-aerobic system. Environ Technol. 2016;37(2):255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Chen S, Rezaei F, et al. Reducing organic loads in wastewater effluents from paper recycling plants using microbial fuel cells. Environ Technol. 2009;30(5):499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simate G, Cluett J, Iyuke S, et al. The treatment of brewery wastewater for reuse: state of the art. Desalination. 2011;273(2–3):235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi O, Yerushalmi L, Haghighat F. Wastewater treatment in the pulp-and-paper industry: A review of treatment processes and the associated greenhouse gas emission. J Environ Manage. 2015;158:146–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg L, Willför S, Holmbom B. Antibacterial effects of knotwood extractives on paper mill bacteria. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31(3):137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav G, Ghangrekar M. Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):717–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Yates M, Cheng S, et al. Examination of microbial fuel cell start-up times with domestic wastewater and additional amendments. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(15):7301–7306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl A, Bischof F, Wichern M. Surface-to-surface biofilm transfer: a quick and reliable startup strategy for mixed culture microbial fuel cells. Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(8):1769–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Min B, Logan B. Evaluation of procedures to acclimate a microbial fuel cell for electricity generation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;68(1):23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudler A, Riedl S, Schröder U. Long-term performance of primary and secondary electroactive biofilms using layered corrugated carbon electrodes. Front Energy Res. 2014;2, Article number 30.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash O, Nimonkar Y, Shouche Y. Practice and prospects of microbial preservation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;339(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Hu J, Petersen E, et al. Probing single- to multi-cell level charge transport in Geobacter sulfurreducens DL-1. Nat Commun. 2013;4, Article number: 2751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam S, Persson F, Wilén B-M, et al. Effects of storage on mixed-culture biological electrodes. Sci Rep. 2015;5, Article number: 18433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerketorp J, Håkansson S, Belkin S, et al. Advances in preservation methods: keeping biosensor microorganisms alive and active. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17(1):43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv Y, Wan C, Liu X, et al. Drying and re-cultivation of aerobic granules. Bioresour Technol. 2013;129:700–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H. Microbial fuel cell: novel anaerobic generation from wastewater. In: Khanal S, editor. Anaerobic biotechnology for bioenergy production: principles and applications. USA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. p. 221–246.
   Google Scholar
• Yükselen M. Preservation characteristics of UASB sludges. J Environ Sci Health. Part A. 1997;32:2069–2076.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Zicari S, Cui Z, et al. Processing anaerobic sludge for extended storage as anaerobic digester inoculum. Bioresour Technol. 2014;166:201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adav S, Lee D-J, Tay J. Activity and structure of stored aerobic granules. Environ Technol. 2007;28(11):1227–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H-C, He, P-J, Wang, G-Z, et al. Enhanced storage stability of aerobic granules seeded with pellets. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(21):8031–8037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour-Cunningham A, Boxall N, Banning N, et al. Preservation of salt-tolerant acidophiles used for chalcopyrite bioleaching: assessment of cryopreservation, liquid-drying and cold storage. Miner Eng. 2017;106:91–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavisto J, Kokko M, Lay C-H, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on continuous electricity production from xylose in up-flow microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2017;42(45):27494–27501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willför S, Sundberg A, Pranovich A, et al. Polysaccharides in some industrially important hardwood species. Wood Sci Technol. 2005;39(8):601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya A, Ozdemir O, Demir A, et al. Electricity production and characterization of high-strength industrial wastewaters in microbial fuel cell. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017;182(2):468–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkinen AE, Nissilä ME, Puhakka JA. Dark fermentative hydrogen production from xylose by a hot spring enrichment culture. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2012;37(17):12234–12240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan B, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, et al. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(17):5181–5192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. Profiling complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microb. 1993;59(3):695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyzer G, Hottenträger S, Teske A, et al. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA – a new molecular approach to analyse the genetic diversity of mixed microbial communities. In: Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn F, editors. Molecular microbial ecology manual. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1996. p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen PEP, Kaksonen AH, Puhakka JA. The relationship between the instability of H2 production and compositions of bacterial communities within a dark fermentation fluidized-bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97(4):742–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakaniemi A-M, Hulatt CJ, Thomas DN, et al. Biogenic hydrogen and methane production from Chlorella vulgaris and Dunaliella tertiolecta biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4(34):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmroth MRT, Langwaldt JH, Aunola TA, et al. Effect of modified Fenton’s reaction on microbial activity and removal of PAHs in creosote oil contaminated soil. Biodegradation. 2006;17(2):29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto R, Srinivasan B, Manuel M, et al. A two-population bio-electrochemical model of a microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(14):5256–5265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Günther S, Hübschmann T, et al. Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. Cytometry A. 2007;71A(8):592–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan B, Regan J. Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14(12):512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Zeng R, Angelidaki I. Electricity production from xylose using a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4178–4184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Thygesen A, Meyer A. Acetate is a superior substrate for microbial fuel cell initiation preceding bioethanol effluent utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(11):4905–4915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Angelidaki I. Effect of humic acids on electricity generation integrated with xylose degradation in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;100(3):413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokko M, Mäkinen A, Sulonen M, et al. Effects of anode potentials on bioelectrogenic conversion of xylose and microbial community compositions. Biochem Eng J. 2015;101:248–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Logan B. Electricity production from xylose in fed-batch and continuous-flow microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80(4):655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boghani H, Kim J, Dinsdale R, et al. Reducing the burden of food processing washdown wastewaters using microbial fuel cells. Biochem Eng J. 2017;117:210–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond D, Lovley D. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(3):1548–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyzer G, Smalla K. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Anton Leeuw. 1998;73(1):127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyzer G. DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2(3):317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Deng D, Zhang Y, et al. Isolation of a facultative anaerobic exoelectrogenic strain LZ-1 and probing electron transfer mechanism in situ by linking UV/Vis spectroscopy and electrochemistry. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;90:264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Cui C, Chen S, et al. A novel mediatorless microbial fuel cell based on direct catalysis of escherichia coli. Chem Commun. 2006;137:2257–2259.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Xie N, Qin Y, et al. Tumebacillus flagellatus sp. nov., an a-amylase/pullulanase-producing bacterium isolated from cassava wastewater. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2013;63:3138–3142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasona A, Kim Y, Healy F, et al. Pyruvate formate lyase and acetate kinase are essential for anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli on xylose. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(22):7593–7600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeppilli M, Villano M, Aulenta F, et al. Effect of the anode feeding composition on the performance of a continuous-flow methane-producing microbial electrolysis cell. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(10):7349–7360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbirato F, Grivet J, Soucaille P, et al. 3-Hydroxypropionaldehyde, an inhibitory metabolite of glycerol fermentation to 1,3-propanediol by enterobacterial species. Appl and Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(4):1448–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Toyonaga M, Ohashi A, et al. Lentimicrobium saccharophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium representing a new family in the phylum Bacteroidetes, and proposal of Lentimicrobiaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:2635–2642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan K-G, Tee K, Yin W-F, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pluralibacter gergoviae FB2, an N-acyl homoserine lactone-degrading strain isolated from packed fish paste. Genome Announc. 2014;2(6):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Teather R. Maintenance of laboratory strains of obligately anaerobic rumen bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44(2):499–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylen K, Hoefman S, Vekeman B, et al. Safeguarding bacterial resources promotes biotechnological innovation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94(3):565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:C125–C142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D, Ryan M. The impact of OECD best practice on the validation of cryopreservation techniques for microorganisms. CryoLetters. 2008;29(1):63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Herman N, White P, et al. Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; A review. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;66(2):183–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimje V, Chen C-Y, Chen C-Y, et al. Stable and high energy generation by a strain of Bacillus subtilis in a microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2009;190(2):258–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney P, Driks A, Eichenberg P. The Bacillus subtilis endospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coat. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar