A membrane aerated biofilm reactor for sulfide control from anaerobically treated wastewater

References

• Krayzelova, L, Bartacek, J, Díaz, I, et al. Microaeration for hydrogen sulfide removal during anaerobic treatment: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2015;14(4):703–725. doi: 10.1007/s11157-015-9386-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisman CJN, Geraats BG, Ijspeert P, et al. Optimization of sulfur production in a biotechnological sulfide-removing reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;35:50–56. doi: 10.1002/bit.260350108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen AJH, Lettinga G, de Keizer A. Removal of hydrogen sulphide from wastewater and waste gases by biological conversion to elemental sulphur: colloidal and interfacial aspects of biologically produced sulphur particles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 1999;151:389–397. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00507-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang K, Baskaran V, Nemati M. Bacteria of the sulphur cycle: an overview of microbiology, biokinetics and their role in petroleum and mining industries. Biochem Eng J. 2009;44:73–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz I, Pérez SI, Ferrero EM, et al. Effect of oxygen dosing point and mixing on the microaerobic removal of hydrogen sulphide in sludge digesters. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:3768–3775. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fdz-Polanco M, Díaz I, Pérez SI, et al. Hydrogen sulphide removal in the anaerobic digestion of sludge by micro-aerobic processes: pilot plant experience. Water Sci Technol. 2009;60:6. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenicek PK, Bindzar J, Zabranska J. Advantages of anaerobic digestion of sludge in microaerobic conditions. Water Sci Technol. 2010;62:7. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camiloti PR, Oliveira GHD, Zaiat M. Sulfur. Recovery from wastewater using a micro-aerobic external silicone membrane reactor (ESMR). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227:31.
   Google Scholar
• Krayzelova L, Bartack J, Kolesarova N, et al. Microaeration for hydrogen sulfide removal in UASB reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:297–302. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos I, Peña M, Fdz-Polanco M. Microaerobic desulphurisation unit: a new biological system for the removal of H2S from biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2013;142:633–640. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu XJ, Chen C, Wang AJ, et al. Enhanced elementary sulfur recovery in integrated sulfate-reducing, sulfur-producing rector under microaerobic condition. Bioresour Technol. 2012;116:517–521. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghiem LD, Manassa P, Dawson M, et al. Oxidation reduction potential as a parameter to regulate micro-oxygen injection into anaerobic digester for reducing hydrogen sulphide concentration in biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2014;173:443–447. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos I, Peña M, Fdz-Polanco M. Where does the removal of H2S from biogas occur in microaerobic reactors? Bioresour Technol. 2014;166:151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey E, Glennon B, Hamer G. Review of membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Resour Conservat Recycl. 1999;27:203–215. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey E, Glennon B, Hamer G. Oxygen mass transfer characteristics in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;62:183–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990120)62:2<183::AID-BIT8>3.0.CO;2-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté P, Bersillon J-L, Huyard A. Bubble-free aeration using membranes: mass transfer analysis. J Membr Sci. 1989;47:91–106. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80862-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindle K, Stephenson T. The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;49:601–610. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960320)49:6<601::AID-BIT1>3.0.CO;2-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindle K, Stephenson T, Semmens MJ. Nitrification and oxygen utilisation in a membrane aeration bioreactor. J Membr Sci. 1998;144:197–209. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Hibiya K, Nagai J, et al. Nitrogen removal characteristics and biofilm analysis of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor applicable to high-strength nitrogenous wastewater treatment. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;95:170–178. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(03)80124-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timberlake DL, Strand SE, Williamson KJ. Combined aerobic heterotrophic oxidation, nitrification and denitrification in a permeable-support biofilm. Water Res. 1988;22:1513–1517. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(88)90163-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y., Miyahara, S., Takeishi, K. Oxygen supply method using gas-permeable film for wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 1994;28:8. doi: 10.1021/es00050a707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagiwa K, Ohkawa A, Hirasa O. Simultaneous organic carbon removal and nitrification by biofilm formed on oxygen enrichment membrane. J Chem Eng Jpn. 1994;27:638–643. doi: 10.1252/jcej.27.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagiwa K, Yoshida M, Ito A, et al. A new oxygen supply method for simultaneous organic carbon removal and nitrification by a one-stage biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 1998;37:117–124. doi: 10.2166/wst.1998.0598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilderer PA, Bräutigam J, Sekoulov I. Application of gas permeable membranes for auxiliary oxygenation of sequencing batch reactors. Conservat Recycl. 1985;8:181–192. doi: 10.1016/0361-3658(85)90035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard CR, Irvine RL. Biological treatment of hypersaline wastewater by a biofilm of halophilic bacteria. Water Environ Res. 1994;66:230–235. doi: 10.2175/WER.66.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobus A, Ulrich S, Röske I. Degradation of chlorophenols by biofilms on semi-permeable membranes in two types of fixed bed reactors. Water Sci Technol. 1995;32:205–212. doi: 10.2166/wst.1995.0299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Zee FP, Villaverde S, García PA, et al. Sulfide removal by moderate oxygenation of anaerobic sludge environments. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:518–524.
   Google Scholar
• APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O’Donnell AG, et al. Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:5488–5491. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5488-5491.2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013. 41, e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:266–267. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie IA. Insidious effects of sequencing errors on perceived diversity in molecular surveys. New Phytol. 2010;188:916–918. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03473.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4:9.
   Google Scholar
• Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol İ, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankhania M, Stephenson T, Semmens MJ. Hollow fibre bioreactor for wastewater treatment using bubbleless membrane aeration. Water Res. 1994;28:2233–2236. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Watanabe K. Sulfuricurvum kujiense gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from an underground crude-oil storage cavity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2297–2300.
   Google Scholar
• Sung Y, Fletcher KE, Ritalahti KM, et al. Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov. Strain SZ, a novel metal-reducing and Tetrachloroethene-Dechlorinating Bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen PH, Liesack W, Schink B. Geovibrio thiophilus sp. nov., a novel sulfur-reducing bacterium belonging to the phylum Deferribacteres. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1341–1347.
   Google Scholar