348
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of ultrasonic pre-treatment on domestic sludge digestion performance and microbial community dynamics

, , , , &
Pages 931-943 | Received 10 Apr 2018, Accepted 12 Aug 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018

References

  • Zou S, Wang X, Chen Y, et al. Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion by ultrasonic pretreatment. Energ Convers Manage. 2016;112:226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.087
  • Foladori P, Andreottola G, Ziglio G. Sludge reduction technologies in wastewater treatment plants. IWA; 2010.
  • Salsabil MR, Laurent J, Casellas M, et al. Techno-economic evaluation of thermal treatment, ozonation and sonication for the reduction of wastewater biomass volume before aerobic or anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater. 2010;174:323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.054
  • González-Fernández C, Sialve B, Bernet N, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and thermal pretreatment of Scenedesmus biomass on methane production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:610–616. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.043
  • Seng B, Khanal SK, Visvanathan C. Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge pretreated by a combined ultrasound and chemical process. Environ Technol. 2010;31:257–265. doi: 10.1080/09593330903453236
  • Bougrier C, Carrère H, Delgenès JP. Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chem Eng J. 2005;106:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2004.11.013
  • Show KY, Mao T, Lee DJ. Optimisation of sludge disruption by sonication. Water Res. 2007;41:4741–4747. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.017
  • Adewuyi G, Deshmane VG. Intensification of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose using high-frequency ultrasound: an investigation of the effects of process parameters on glucose yield. Energy Fuels. 2015;29:4998–5006. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00661
  • Boni MR, D’Amato E, Polettini A, et al. Effect of ultrasonication on anaerobic degradability of solid waste digestate. Waste Manage. 2016;48:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.031
  • Tiehm A, Nickel K, Neis U. The use of ultrasound to accelerate the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Sci Technol. 1997;36:121–128. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0402
  • Gagliano MC, Gallipoli A, Rossetti S. Efficacy of methanogenic biomass acclimation in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of ultrasound pretreated sludge. Environ Technol. 2018;39(10):1250–1259. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1327555
  • Apul OG, Sanin FD. Ultrasonic pretreatment and subsequent anaerobic digestion under different operational conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8984–8992. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.128
  • Pilli S, Yan S, Tyagi RD, et al. Anaerobic digestion of ultrasonicated sludge at different solids concentrations - computation of mass-energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions. J Environ Manage. 2016;166:374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.041
  • Feng X, Deng J, Lei H, et al. Dewaterability of waste activated sludge with ultrasound conditioning. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:1074–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.055
  • Khanal SK, Grewell D, Sung S, et al. Ultrasound applications in wastewater sludge pretreatment: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2007;37:277–313. doi: 10.1080/10643380600860249
  • Li H, Jin Y, Rasool Bux M, et al. Effects of ultrasonic disintegration on sludge microbial activity and dewaterability. J Hazard Mater. 2009;161:1421–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.113
  • Jaziri K, Casellas M, Dagot C. Comparing the effects of three pre-treatment disintegration techniques on aerobic sludge digestion: biodegradability enhancement and microbial community monitoring by PCR–DGGE. Environ Technol. 2012;33:1435–1444. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.632653
  • Braguglia CM, Gianico A, Mininni G. Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion. J Environ Management. 2012;95:S139–S143. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030
  • Cokgor E, Sanin D, Filibeli A, et al. Management of domestic/urban wastewater sludges in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey: TUBITAK (Turkish National Scientific Council); 2014. (Final Report;108G167).
  • Sanguinetti CJ, Neto DE, Simpson AJG. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques. 1994;17:915–919.
  • Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jürgens K, et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011;5:1571–1579. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.41
  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing MOTHUR: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09
  • Pala-Ozkok I, Rehman A, Yagci N, et al. Characteristics of mixed microbial culture at different sludge ages: effect on variable kinetics for substrate utilization. Bioresour Technol. 2012;126:274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.115
  • Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedj JM, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the New bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07
  • APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation; 2005. (21st Ed.).
  • Tas D O, Yangin-Gomec C, Olmez-Hanci T, et al. Comparative assessment of sludge pre-treatment techniques to enhance sludge dewaterability and biogas production. Clean-Soil, Air Water 2018;46(1):1–8.
  • Pérez-Elvira SI, Ferreira LC, Donoso-Bravo A, et al. Full-stream and part-stream ultrasound treatment effect on sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61:1363–1372. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.893
  • Kim D, Lee J. Ultrasonic sludge disintegration for enhanced methane production in anaerobic digestion: effects of sludge hydrolysis efficiency and hydraulic retention time. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2012;35:289–296. doi: 10.1007/s00449-011-0588-x
  • Carlsson M, Lagerkvist A, Morgan-Sagastume F. The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: A review. Waste Manag. 2012;32:1634–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.016
  • Lafitte-Trouque S, Forster CF. The use of ultrasound and γ -irradiation as pretreatments for the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol. 2002;84:113–118. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00038-X
  • Gadhe A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN. Ultrasonic pretreatment for an enhancement of biohydrogen production from complex food waste. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:7721–7729. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.105
  • Fernández-Cegrí V, de la Rubia MA, Raposo F, et al. Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment under different operational conditions on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2012;19:1003–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.02.001
  • Castrillón L, Fernández-Nava Y, Ormaechea P, et al. Optimization of biogas production from cattle manure by pre-treatment with ultrasound and co-digestion with crude glycerin. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:7845–7849. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.047
  • Emir E, Erdincler A. The role of compactibility in liquid-solid separation of wastewater sludges. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53:121–126. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.215
  • Lee CH, Liu JC. Sludge dewaterability and floc structure in dual polymer conditioning. Adv Environ Res. 2001;5:129–136. doi: 10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00049-6
  • Wang F, Wang Y, Ji M. Mechanisms and kinetics models for ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration. J Hazard Mater. 2005;123:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.033
  • Ruiz-Hernando M, Cabanillas E, Labanda J, et al. Ultrasound, thermal and alkali treatments affect extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and improve waste activated sludge dewatering. Process Biochem. 2015;50:438–446. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.01.001
  • Tytła M, Zielewicz E. The impact of temporal variability of excess sludge characteristics on the effects obtained in the process of its ultrasonic disintegration. Environ Technol. 2017; 14. doi:10.1080/09593330.2017.1371251.
  • Tyagi VK, Lo SL, Appels L, et al. Ultrasonic treatment of waste sludge: A review on mechanisms and applications. Critical Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2014;44:1220–1288. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2013.763587
  • Le NT, Julcour-Lebigue C, Delmas H. An executive review of sludge pretreatment by sonication. J Environ Sciences. 2014;37:139–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.05.031
  • Kim YM, Uk Cho HU, Park KY, et al. Identification of the bacterial community of a pilot-scale thermophilic aerobic bioreactor treating sewage sludge. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;92:66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.04.019
  • Westerholm M, Crauwels S, Van Geel M, et al. Microwave and ultrasound pre-treatments influence microbial community structure and digester performance in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:5339–5352. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7321-2
  • Xia Y, Yang C, Zhang T. Microbial effects of part-stream low-frequency ultrasonic pretreatment on sludge anaerobic digestion as revealed by high-throughput sequencing-based metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:189. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1178-9
  • Vu B, Chen M, Crawford RJ, et al. Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides involved in biofilm formation. Molecules. 2009;14:2535–2554. doi: 10.3390/molecules14072535

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.