Treated wastewater reuse in micro-irrigation: effect of shear stress on biofilm development kinetics and chemical precipitation

References

• Megersa G, Abdulahi J. Irrigation system in Israel: A review. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng. 2015;7(3):29–37. doi: 10.5897/IJWREE2014.0556
   Google Scholar
• Bounoua S. Etude du colmatage des systèmes d’irrigation localisée [Study of the localized irrigation systems clogging] [dissertation]. Aix Marseille University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Huang G. Laboratory experiment on drip emitter clogging with fresh water and treated sewage effluent. Agric Water Manag. 2009;96:745–756. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu W, Liu L, Chen X. Influence of fine particle size and concentration on the clogging of labyrinth emitters. Irrig Sci. 2013;31(4):545–555. doi: 10.1007/s00271-012-0328-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dazhuang Y, Zhihui B, Rowan M, et al. Biofilm structure and its influence on clogging in drip irrigation emitters distributing reclaimed wastewater. J Environ Sci. 2009;21:834–841. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62349-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamri S, Soric A, Tomas S, et al. Biofilm development in micro-irrigation emitters for wastewater reuse. Irrig Sci. 2014;32(1):77–85. doi: 10.1007/s00271-013-0414-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucks DA, Nakayama FS, Gilbert RG. Trickle irrigation water quality and preventive maintenance. Agric Water Manag. 1979;2(2):149–162. doi: 10.1016/0378-3774(79)90028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer K, Singer G, Limberger R, et al. Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4966–4974. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00588-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo P, Malheiro J, Machado I, et al. Influence of flow velocity on the characteristics of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms. J. Environ. Eng. 2016;142:04016031. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomen P, Robert J, Monmeyran A, et al. Bacterial biofilm under flow: first a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0175197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Shi Y, Dong W, et al. Study on hydraulic performance of drip emitters by computational fluid dynamics. Agric Water Manag. 2006;84(1-2):130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Muhammad J, Tomas S, Anselmet F. Modeling a week turbulent flow in a narrow and wavy channel: case of micro-irrigation. Irrig Sci. 2016;34(5):361–377. doi: 10.1007/s00271-016-0508-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau L, Lifchitz E. Theoretical physics volume 6: Fluid Mechanics. Sykes JB, Reid WH, translator; Institute of physical Problems, U.S.S.R Academy of Sciences; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Zhang Z, Bott T. Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2005;43:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG, Trulear MG, Bryers JD, et al. Dynamics of biofilm processes: methods. Water Res. 1982;16(7):1207–1216. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(82)90139-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasche S, Horn H, Hempel DC. Influence of growth conditions on biofilm development and mass transfer at the bulk/biofilm interface. Water Res. 2002;36(19):4775–4784. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00215-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamri S. Réutilisation des eaux usées traitées en irrigation localisée: impact des conditions d’écoulement et des matériaux sur le développement de biofilm [Reuse of treated wastewater in localized irrigation: impact of flow conditions and materials on biofilm development] [dissertation]. Université d’Aix Marseille; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167–193. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn H, Reiff H, Morgenroth E. Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;81(5):607–617. doi: 10.1002/bit.10503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li GB, Li YK, Xu TW, et al. Effects of average velocity on the growth and surface topography of biofilms attached to the reclaimed wastewater drip irrigation system laterals. Irrig Sci. 2012;30:103–113. doi: 10.1007/s00271-011-0266-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG. Bioengineering report: Fouling biofilm development: A process analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1981;23(9):1923–1960. doi: 10.1002/bit.260230902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo L, Vieira M. Physical stability and biological activity of biofilms under turbulent flow and low substrate concentration. Bioprocess Eng. 1999;20(4):363–368. doi: 10.1007/s004490050604
   Google Scholar
• Derlon N, Massé A, Escudié R, et al. Stratification in the cohesion of biofilms grown under various environmental conditions. Water Res. 2008;42(8-9):2102–2110. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Characklis WG. Laboratory biofilm reactor. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC, editors. Biofilms. New York (NY): Wiley; 1990. p. 55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes IB, Simões M, Simões LC. An overview on the reactors to study drinking water biofilms. Water Res. 2014;62:63–87. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochex A, Godon JJ, Bernet N, et al. Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Res. 2008;42(20):4915–4922. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivilyov M, Detandt Y, Abeele DV, et al. Direct numerical simulations of Taylor–Couette flow using a hybrid spectral/finite element approach. In: Proc. of the 7th National Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Mons, Belgium; 2006. 6p.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor GI. Statistical theory of turbulence. Proc Roy Soc London, Ser A. 1935;151:421–444. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1935.0158
   Google Scholar
• Coufort C. Analyse expérimentale de la floculation en réacteur de Taylor-Couette: Influence de l’hydrodynamique sur les phénomènes d’agglomération et de rupture [Experimental analysis flocculation in a Taylor-Couette reactor: Influence of hydrodynamics on agglomeration and rupture phenomena ] [dissertation]. INSA Toulouse; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Racina A, Kind M. Specific power input and local micromixing times in turbulent Taylor–couette flow. Exp Fluids. 2006;41:513–522. doi: 10.1007/s00348-006-0178-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt F. Turbulente Strömungen zwischen zwei rotierenden Zylindern [Turbulent flows between two rotating cylinders]. Ingenieurs-Archiv. 1933;4:577–595. German.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick A, Morfett J. Hydraulics in civil and environmental engineering. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Muhammad J, Tomas S, Ait-Mouheb N, et al. Micro-PIV characterization of the flow in a milli-labyrinth-channel used in drip irrigation. Exp Fluids. 2018;59(12):181. doi: 10.1007/s00348-018-2633-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner RJ, Boulger Jr RW, Oblinger CJ, et al. Guidelines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors: Station operation, record computation, and data reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 1–D3, 2006; 51 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rizk N, Ait-Mouheb N, Bourrié G, et al. Parameters controlling chemical deposits in micro-irrigation with treated wastewater. J Water Supply: Res Technol-Aqua. 2017;66:587–597. doi: 10.2166/aqua.2017.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Tay JH. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Res. 2002;36(7):1653–1665. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00379-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder JS, Buiter J, Riviere M, et al. Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems. Water Res. 2010;44:689–702. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decho AW. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Cont. Shelf Res. 2000;20:1257–1273. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok W, Picioreanu C, Ong S, et al. Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;58(4):400–407. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980520)58:4<400::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picioreanu C, Van Loosdrecht MC, Heijnen JJ. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;72(2):205–218. doi: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000120)72:2<205::AID-BIT9>3.0.CO;2-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourney J, Ngwenya BT. Bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) mediate CaCO3 morphology and polymorphism. Chem. Geol. 2009;262:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XG, Lv Y, Ma BG, et al. Decomposition kinetic characteristics of calcium carbonate containing organic acids by TGA. Arab J Chem. 2013;10(2):S2534–S2538.
   Google Scholar
• Obst M, Dynes J, Lawrence J, et al. Precipitation of amorphous CaCO3 (aragonite-like) by cyanobacteria: a STXM study of the influence of EPS on the nucleation process. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2009;73:4180–4198. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzerara K, Menguy N, Lopez-Garcia P, et al. Nanoscale detection of organic signatures in carbonate microbialites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9440–9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603255103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei S, Cui H, Jiang Z, et al. Biomineralization processes of calcite induced by bacteria isolated from marine sediments. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015;46:455–464. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246220140533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arp G, Thiel V, Reimer A, et al. Biofilm exopolymers control microbialite formation at thermal springs discharging into the alkaline Pyramid Lake, Nevada, USA. Sediment Geol. 1999;126:159–176. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00038-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupraz C, Visscher PT. Microbial lithification in marine stromatolites and hypersaline mats. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braissant O, Decho AW, Dupraz C, et al. Exopolymeric substances of sulfate-reducing bacteria: interactions with calcium at alkaline pH and implication for formation of carbonate minerals. Geobiol. 2007;5:401–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2007.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imas P, Cohen A. Improving the pH of irrigation waters with acidic fertilizers. The Proceedings of the International Plant Nutrition Colloquium XVI. P4; 2009.
   Google Scholar