1,406
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Combining numerical simulation with response surface modelling for optimization of reject water partial nitritation/anammox in moving bed biofilm reactor

ORCID Icon &
Pages 2823-2835 | Received 28 Sep 2019, Accepted 25 Nov 2019, Published online: 23 Jan 2020

References

  • Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, et al. Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences – an application survey. Water Res. 2014;55:292–303. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.032
  • UE Urban Waste Water Directive. Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC). J Eur Commun; 34:40.
  • Bugajski P, Chmielowski K, Kaczor G. Reliability of a collective wastewater treatment plant. J Ecol Eng. 2016;17(4):143–147. doi: 10.12911/22998993/64505
  • Mao N, Ren H, Geng J, et al. Engineering application of anaerobic ammonium oxidation process in wastewater treatment. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33(8):153. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2313-7
  • Janiak K, Miodoński S, Muszyński-Huhajło M. Failure of the side-stream deammonification process. risk of violation of the WWTP effluent quality. Environ Prot Eng. 2018;44(2).
  • Zhang Q, Vlaeminck SE, DeBarbadillo C, et al. Reject water organics from anaerobic digestion after thermal hydrolysis cause direct and/or diffusional activity loss for nitritation and anammox. Water Res. 2018;143:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.037
  • Gu BW, Lee CG, Park S. Application of response surface methodology and semi-mechanistic model to optimize fluoride removal using crushed concrete in a fixed-bed column. Environ Technol. 2018;39(5):616–627. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1309074
  • Nair A, Makwana AR, Ahammed MM. The use of response surface methodology for modelling and analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes: a review. Water Sci Technol. 2014;69(3):464–478. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.733
  • Mosaddeghi MR, Pajoum Shariati F, Vaziri Yazdi SA, et al. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing coagulation process of paper recycling wastewater using Ocimum basilicum. Environ Technol. 2018: 1–9. DOI:10.1080/09593330.2018.1491637.
  • Marzouk Trifi I, Trifi B, Ben Souissi E, et al. Response surface methodology for dyes removal by adsorption onto alginate calcium. Environ Technol. 2019;2019:1–10. DOI:10.1080/09593330.2019.1612470.
  • Fernández I, Plaza E, Trela J, et al. Evaluation of deammonification process by response surface models. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011;215(1-4):299–309. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0479-9
  • Xing BS, Guo Q, Zhang ZZ, et al. Optimization of process performance in a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014;170:404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.026
  • Zhou J, Qin G, Zhang J, et al. Study on the mutual interactions between the parameters of a CANON system and its coping strategy when operating at room temperature (15 to 25° C) using response surface methodology. Water Sci Technol. 2014;69(9):1805–1812. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.062
  • Leix C, Drewes JE, Ye L, et al. Strategies for enhanced deammonification performance and reduced nitrous oxide emissions. Bioresour Technol. 2017;236:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.182
  • Gut L, Plaza E, Hultman B. Assessment of a two-step partial nitritation/anammox system with implementation of multivariate data analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2007;86(1):26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.08.004
  • Wanner O, Reichert P. Mathematical modeling of mixed-culture biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;49(2):172–184. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960120)49:2<172::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-N
  • Trojanowicz K, Plaza E, Trela J. Model extension, calibration and validation of partial nitritation–anammox process in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for reject and mainstream wastewater. Environ Technol. 2019;40(9):1079–1100. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1397765
  • Box GE. The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: some general considerations and examples. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):16–60. doi: 10.2307/3001663
  • Szatkowska B, Cema G, Plaza E, et al. A one-stage system with partial nitritation and anammox processes in the moving-bed biofilm reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2007;55(8-9):19–26. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.237
  • Yang J. The deammonification process in moving bed biofilm reactors [PhD thesis]. TRITA LWR PHD-2016:05; 2016.
  • Pynaert K, Smets BF, Beheydt D, et al. Start-up of autotrophic nitrogen removal reactors via sequential biocatalyst addition. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;38(4):1228–1235. doi: 10.1021/es030081+
  • Vlaeminck SE, Terada A, Smets BF, et al. Nitrogen removal from digested black water by one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(13):5035–5041. doi: 10.1021/es803284y
  • Christensson M, Ekström S, Chan AA, et al. Experience from start-ups of the first ANITA Mox plants. Water Sci Technol. 2013;67(12):2677–2684. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.156
  • Beier M, Schneider Y. Abschlussbericht Entwickelung von Bilanzmodellen für die Prozesse Deammonifikation und Nitritation zur Abbildung gross-and halb-technischer Anlagen (Final report development of balance models for deammonification and nitritation processes to illustrate full and half technical scale installations). Hannover: Leibniz University Hannover; 2008; 39.
  • Malovanyy A, Yang J, Trela J, et al. Combination of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and partial nitritation/anammox moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.101
  • Yang J, Trela J, Zubrowska-Sudol M, et al. Intermittent aeration in one-stage partial nitritation/anammox process. Ecol Eng. 2015;75:413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.016
  • Cema G, Płaza E, Trela J, et al. Dissolved oxygen as a factor influencing nitrogen removal rates in a one-stage system with partial nitritation and anammox process. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(5):1009–1015. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.449
  • Sultana R, Plaza E, Wilén BM. Influence of dissolved oxygen concentration on one stage deammonification operated at different temperatures. Proceedings from IWA Specialist Conference - Global Challenges: sustainable wastewater treatment and Resource Recovery; 26–30 October 2014, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Zubrowska-Sudol M, Yang J, Trela J, et al. Evaluation of deammonification process performance at different aeration strategies. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(6):1168–1176. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.356
  • Gustavsson DJI. Biological sludge liquor treatment at municipal wastewater treatment plants – a review. Vatten. 2010;66(3):179–192.
  • Rosenwinkel KH, Cornelius A. Deammonification in the moving-bed process for the treatment of wastewater with high ammonia content. Chem Eng Technol. 2005;28(1):49–52. doi: 10.1002/ceat.200407070
  • Hosseinpour B, Saborimanesh N, Yerushalmi L, et al. Start-up of oxygen-limited autotrophic partial nitrification-anammox process for treatment of nitrite-free wastewater in a single-stage hybrid bioreactor. Environ Technol. 2019: 1–9. DOI:10.1080/09593330.2019.1649467.
  • Nikolaev Y, Kallistova A, Kevbrina M, et al. Novel design and optimisation of a nitritation/anammox set-up for ammonium removal from filtrate of digested sludge. Environ Technol. 2018;39(5):593–606. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1308442
  • Lackner S, Thoma K, Gilbert EM, et al. Start-up of a full-scale deammonification SBR-treating effluent from digested sludge dewatering. Water Sci Technol. 2015;71(4):553–559. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.421
  • Van Hulle SW, Vandeweyer HJ, Meesschaert BD, et al. Engineering aspects and practical application of autotrophic nitrogen removal from nitrogen rich streams. Chem Eng J. 2010;162(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.037
  • Strous M, Kuenen JG, Jetten MS. Key physiology of anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(7):3248–3250. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.7.3248-3250.1999
  • Van Hulle SW, Volcke EI, Teruel JL, et al. Influence of temperature and pH on the kinetics of the Sharon nitritation process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2007;82(5):471–480. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1692
  • Wett B, Rauch W. The role of inorganic carbon limitation in biological nitrogen removal of extremely ammonia concentrated wastewater. Water Res. 2003;37(5):1100–1110. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00440-2
  • Veys P, Vandeweyer H, Audenaert W, et al. Performance analysis and optimization of autotrophic nitrogen removal in different reactor configurations: a modelling study. Environ Technol. 2010;31(12):1311–1324. doi: 10.1080/09593331003713685
  • Sliekers AO, Third KA, Abma W, et al. CANON and anammox in a gas-lift reactor. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;218(2):339–344. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(02)01177-1
  • Tsushima I, Ogasawara Y, Kindaichi T, et al. Development of high-rate anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) biofilm reactors. Water Res. 2007;41(8):1623–1634. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.050