Preparation of a thin-film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane for the removal of organic micro-pollutants from aqueous solutions

References

• Ravishankar H, Christy J, Jegatheesan V. Graphene oxide (GO)-blended polysulfone (PSf) ultrafiltration membranes for lead ion rejection. Membranes. 2018;8:77. doi: 10.3390/membranes8030077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Gao X, Ma Z, et al. Combined water flux enhancement of PES-based TFC membranes in ultrasonic-assisted forward osmosis processes. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;64:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Go G-W, Jang A. Study of flux decline and solute diffusion on an osmotically driven membrane process potentially applied to municipal wastewater reclamation. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;33:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee R, De S. Novel carbon-nanoparticle polysulfone hollow fiber mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane: adsorptive removal of benzene, phenol and toluene from aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol. 2016;157:229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza W, Lee J, Raza N, et al. Removal of phenolic compounds from industrial waste water based on membrane-based technologies. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;71:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramteke LP, Gogate PR. Treatment of toluene, benzene, naphthalene and xylene (BTNXs) containing wastewater using improved biological oxidation with pretreatment using Fenton/ultrasound based processes. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;28:247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Liu X-Y, Chung T-S, et al. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO). Water Res. 2016;91:104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sule MN, Templeton MR, Bond T. Rejection of organic micro-pollutants from water by a tubular, hydrophilic pervaporative membrane designed for irrigation applications. Environ Technol. 2016;37:1382–1389. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1116610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintor AM, Vilar VJ, Botelho CM, et al. Oil and grease removal from wastewaters: sorption treatment as an alternative to state-of-the-art technologies. A critical review. Chem Eng J. 2016;297:229–255. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhaveri JH, Patel CM, Murthy Z. Preparation, characterization and application of GO-TiO2/PVC mixed matrix membranes for improvement in performance. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;52:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaviska F, Chun Y, Heran M, et al. Using FO as pre-treatment of RO for high scaling potential brackish water: energy and performance optimisation. J Memb Sci. 2015;492:430–438. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey T, Bajraktari N, Vogel J, et al. The effects of physicochemical wastewater treatment operations on forward osmosis. Environ Technol. 2017;38:2130–2142. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1246616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das P, Singh KKK, Dutta S. Insight into emerging applications of forward osmosis systems. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;72:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law JY, Mohammad AW. Multiple-solute salts as draw solution for osmotic concentration of succinate feed by forward osmosis. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;51:264–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah N, Yusof N, Lau W, et al. Recent trends of heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by membrane technologies. J Ind Eng Chem. 2019;76:17–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey T, Zarebska A, Bajraktari N, et al. Influences of mechanical pretreatment on the non-biological treatment of municipal wastewater by forward osmosis. Environ Technol. 2017;38:2295–2304. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1256440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip NY, Elimelech M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:10273–10282. doi: 10.1021/es203197e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emadzadeh D, Lau WJ, Matsuura T, et al. A novel thin film composite forward osmosis membrane prepared from PSf–TiO2 nanocomposite substrate for water desalination. Chem Eng J. 2014;237:70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma N, Wei J, Qi S, et al. Nanocomposite substrates for controlling internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes. J Memb Sci. 2013;441:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhu H, Feng L, et al. Effects of polyethylene glycol on the structure and filtration performance of thin-film PA-Psf composite forward osmosis membranes. Sep Sci Technol. 2016;51:862–873. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2015.1119846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Ng HY. Fabrication of layered silica–polysulfone mixed matrix substrate membrane for enhancing performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. J Memb Sci. 2015;481:148–163. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ou R, Wang H, et al. Graphene oxide modified graphitic carbon nitride as a modifier for thin film composite forward osmosis membrane. J Memb Sci. 2015;475:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Deng B. Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. J Memb Sci. 2015;479:256–275. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung W-S, Chiao Y-H, Sengupta A, et al. Tuning the interlayer spacing of forward osmosis membranes based on ultrathin graphene oxide to achieve desired performance. Carbon. 2018;142:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajik S, Moini Jazani O, Shokrollahzadeh S, et al. Thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane prepared by graphene oxide embedded PSf substrate. J Particle Sci Technol. 2016;2:103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Yin J, Zhu G, Deng B. Graphene oxide (GO) enhanced polyamide (PA) thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for water purification. Desalination. 2016;379:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi-Jurkuyeh A, Jonidi-Jafari A. Synthesis of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for removing organic micro-pollutants from aqueous solutions. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. 2018;19:1160–1166. doi: 10.2166/ws.2018.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi-Jurkuyeh A, Jafari AJ, Kalantary RR, et al. A novel synthetic thin-film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane modified by graphene oxide and polyethylene glycol for heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions. React Funct Polym. 2020;146:104397. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia S, Yao L, Zhao Y, et al. Preparation of graphene oxide modified polyamide thin film composite membranes with improved hydrophilicity for natural organic matter removal. Chem Eng J. 2015;280:720–727. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini M, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A. Synthesis of novel thin film nanocomposite (TFN) forward osmosis membranes using functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Memb Sci. 2013;435:233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emadzadeh D, Lau WJ, Matsuura T, et al. Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization. J Memb Sci. 2014;449:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc-Grabowska E. Effect of micropore size distribution on phenol adsorption on steam activated carbons. Adsorption. 2016;22:599–607. doi: 10.1007/s10450-015-9737-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Gao X, Wei Y, et al. Enhanced desalination performance of carboxyl functionalized graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes. Desalination. 2017;405:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh B, Isloor AM, Ismail AF. Enhanced hydrophilicity and salt rejection study of graphene oxide-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane. Desalination. 2013;313:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CY, Kwon Y-N, Leckie JO. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination. 2009;242:149–167. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali ME, Wang L, Wang X, et al. Thin film composite membranes embedded with graphene oxide for water desalination. Desalination. 2016;386:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, et al. Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Memb Sci. 2014;453:292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee R, Bhunia P, De S. Impact of graphene oxide on removal of heavy metals using mixed matrix membrane. Chem Eng J. 2016;292:284–297. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrgozar Eslah S, Shokrollahzadeh S, Moini Jazani O, et al. Forward osmosis water desalination: fabrication of graphene oxide-polyamide/polysulfone thin-film nanocomposite membrane with high water flux and low reverse salt diffusion. Sep Sci Technol. 2018;53:573–583. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2017.1398261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, et al. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Memb Sci. 2012;396:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaki H, Sharma K, Saktaywin W. Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters. Desalination. 2002;144:287–294. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00329-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang S, Gao J, et al. Layer-by-layer construction of graphene oxide (GO) framework composite membranes for highly efficient heavy metal removal. J Memb Sci. 2016;515:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M, Nghiem LD, Price WE, et al. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2012;46:2683–2692. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar