The treatment of high-concentration garlic processing wastewater by UASB-SBR

References

• Rashed E M, Massoud M. The effect of effective microorganisms (EM) on EBPR in modified contact stabilization system. HBRC journal. 2015;11(3):384–392.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafari J, Javidb A B, et al. Performance of modified one-stage Phoredox reactor with hydraulic up-flow in biological removal of phosphorus from municipal wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2019;171:216–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari J, Seyedsalehi M, et al. Simultaneous biological organic matter and nutrient removal in an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2O) moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) integrated system. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;14(2):291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghipour D, Rouhbakhsh E, et al. Application of the biological reactor with fixed media (IFAS) for removal of organic matter and nutrients in small communities. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2020;1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari J, Mesdaghinia A, et al. Investigation of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor/ Aerobic Moving Bed Bio Reactor (AFBR/MMBR) System for Treatment of Currant Wastewater. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(8):860–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntner D, Sánchez A, et al. Feasibility of combined UASB and MBR system in dairy wastewater treatment at ambient temperatures. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2013;230:475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S J, Kim T H, Applicability and trends of anaerobic granular sludge treatment processes. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2014;60:189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A A, Gaur R Z, et al. Integrated UASB and Batch Sequencing Reactor System for Domestic Sewage Treatment. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2010;50(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Khan A A, Gaur R Z, et al. Performance assessment of different STPs based on UASB followed by aerobic post treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2014;12(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu G, Song Y, et al. Combination of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for berberine reduction from wastewater and the effects of berberine on bacterial community dynamics. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013;50:246–247.
   Google Scholar
• Chung J, Tian D J. Separation of organic matter from domestic sewage in a UASB-ABF system with anoxic bio-flocculation. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(5):620–628.
   Google Scholar
• Moawad A, Mahmoud U F, et al. Coupling of sequencing batch reactor and UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2009;242(1-3):325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungray A K, Patel K, et al. Coliforms removal in two UASB + ASP based systems. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2011;65(1):23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee P, Ghangrekar M M, et al. Organic matter and nitrogen removal in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket—Moving bed biofilm and rope bed biofilm reactor. Journal of environmental chemical engineering. 2016;4(3):3240–3245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant D, Adholeya A, et al. Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: A review. Bioresource Technology. 2007;98(12):2321–2334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, He H J, et al. Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds. Biotechnology Advanced. 2016;34(6):1091–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffredo V, Falk M W, et al. Biostorage polymers phenomena in cheese wastewater treatment by a sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Environmental Engneering. 2009;135(2):101–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C J, Zhang Y, et al. Study of Pilotscale Experiment for Treatment of Piggery Wastewater by UASB-SBR. Advanced Materials Research. 2012;356-360:2047–2050.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail N F, Jami M S, et al. Modelling and simulation of energy-saving potential of sequential batch reactor (SBR) in the abatement of ammoniacal-nitrogen and organics. Journal of Pure Application Microbiology. 2014;8:809–814.
   Google Scholar
• Chang H N, Moon R K, et al. Simulation of sequential batch reactor (SBR) operation for simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Bioprocess Engneering. 2000;23(5):513–521.
   Google Scholar
• Fu Y, Li F, et al. Research on SBR Process of Garlic Processing Wastewater. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy. 2016;36(001):30–34.
   Google Scholar
• He H, Zhang X, et al. Treatment of organic wastewater containing high concentration of sulfate by crystallization-Fenton-SBR. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2018;144(6):801–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang J, Feng X, et al. Purification and utilization of garlic processing wastewater in lotus pond wetlands. Water Science and Engineering. 2014;7(4):395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial Board of the State Environmental Protection Administration, . State Environmental Protection Administration. Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis Method (Fourth Edition). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Schmieder R, Edwards R, et al. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):863–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carina S, Al-Soud W A, et al. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. Fems Microbiology Ecology. 2013;85(3):612–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouts D E, Sebastian S, et al. Next Generation Sequencing to Define Prokaryotic and Fungal Diversity in the Bovine Rumen. Plos One. 2012;7(11):82–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, De Vrieze J Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic wastewater in a UASB-digester at 10°C and microbial community dynamics. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL. 2018;334(2):2088–2097.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi T, Abbasi S A Formation and impact of granules in fostering clean energy production and wastewater treatment in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16(3):1696–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato N, Okubo T, et al. Prospects for a self-sustained sewage treatment system:a case study on full-scale UASB system in India’s Yamuna River basin. Journal of Environmental Management. 2006;80:198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed M B, Zhou J L, et al. Progress in the biological and chemical treatment technologies for emerging contaminant removal from wastewater: a critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017;323:274–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Velázquez K, Villanueva-Rodríguez M, et al. Removal of 17α-ethinylestradiol and caffeine from wastewater by UASB-Fenton coupled system. Environmental Technology. 2020;18:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D H, Behera S K Methane production potential of leachate generated from Korean food waste recycling facilities: a lab scale study. Waste Management. 2009;29:876–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur R Z, Khan A A, et al. Performance of Full-Scale UASB Reactors Treating Low or Medium Strength Municipal Wastewater. Environmental Processes. 2017;4(1):137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mirghorayshi M, Zinatizadeh A A, et al. Evaluating the process performance and potential of a high-rate single airlift bioreactor for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal through coupling different pathways from a nitrogen-rich wastewater. Bioresource Technology. 2018;260:44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng X, Rui L. Comparative study on microbial community in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors (SBR) and a traditional SBR treating digested piggery wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China: English version. 2017;11(003):97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Jia S, Han H. Impact of high external circulation ratio on the performance of anaerobic reactor treating coal gasification wastewater under thermophilic condition. Bioresource Technology. 2015;192:507–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q L, Song Q, et al. Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor with mixed carbon sources: reactor performance, extracellular polymeric substances and microbial successions. Chemistry Engineering Journal. 2018;331:841–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yuan Y, et al. Enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater in an anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactor with sludge fermentation products as carbon source. Bioresource Technology. 2017;244(1):1158–1165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ye J, Liang J Operation optimization of a photosequencing batch reactor for wastewater treatment: study on influencing factors and impact on symbiotic microbial ecology. Bioresource Technology. 2018;252:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindaichi T, Yamaoka S, et al. Phylogenetic diversity and ecophysiology of candidate phylum saccharibacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2016;92(6):7–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Liu S, et al. Improved performance of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification via nitrite in an oxygen-limited SBR by alternating the DO. Bioresource Technology. 2019;275:153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Dang Y, et al.. Raising nutrients removal efficiency by improving the internal recycling strategy in an anoxic/oxic-membrane bioreactor package plant. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2015;57(23):10815–10825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim Y W, Lee S A, et al. Diversity of denitrifying bacteria isolated from Daejeon Sewage Treatment Plant. Journal Microbiology. 2005;43:383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng W, Wang A, et al. Enhanced biological phosphate removal from wastewater and clade-level population dynamics of “Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis” under free nitrous acid inhibition: linked with detoxication. Chemistry Engineering Journal. 2016;296:234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissbrodt D G, Maillard J, et al. Multilevel correlations in the biological phosphorus removal process: from bacterial enrichment to conductivity-based metabolic batch tests and polyphosphatase assays. Biotechnology Bioengineering. 2014;111:2421–2435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchobanoglous G, Burton F B, et al. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse (4th ed.). Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., USA. 2003;4:611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Yang Q, et al. Advanced landfill leachate treatment using a two-stage UASB-SBR system at low temperature. Journal of Environmental Science (China). 2010;22(4):481–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar