Greywater treatment in SBR-SND reactor - optimization of hydraulic retention time, volumetric exchange ratio and sludge retention time

References

• Hurlimann A. Household use of and satisfaction with alternative water sources in Victoria Australia. J Environ Manage. 2011;92:2691–2697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noutsopoulos C, Andreadakis A, Kouris N, et al. Greywater characterization and loadings – physicochemical treatment to promote onsite reuse. J Environ Manage. 2018;216:337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto U, Maheshwari BL. Sustainable graywater reuse for residential landscape irrigation – A critical review. Chinese J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2015;13:250–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong JYC, Oh KS, Poh PE, et al. Prospects of hybrid rainwater-greywater decentralised system for water recycling and reuse: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;142:3014–3027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil M, Liu Y. Greywater biodegradability and biological treatment technologies: A critical review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2021;161:105211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Gu S, Peng Y, et al. Progress in the development of control strategies for the SBR process. Clean – Soil, Air, Water. 2010;38:732–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Wei Z, Li S, et al. Performance and operational strategy of simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal system under the condition of low organic loading rate in wet weather. Chemosphere. 2021;270:129464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu GC, Lu YZ, Xu LR. Effects of the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio on a system coupling simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) and denitrifying phosphorus removal (DPR). Environ Technol. 2021;42:3048–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes H, Jungles MK, Hoffmann H, et al. Full-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for domestic wastewater: performance and diversity of microbial communities. Bioresour Technol. 2013;132:262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel A, Zekker I, Jaagura M, et al. Enhancement of anoxic phosphorus uptake of denitrifying phosphorus removal process by biomass adaption. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019;16:5965–5978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Mandel A, Rikmann E, et al. Ameliorating effect of nitrate on nitrite inhibition for denitrifying P-accumulating organisms. Sci Total Environ. 2021;797:149133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Polonio E, Fernández-Navarro J, Iborra-Clar MI, et al. Removal of pharmaceutical compounds commonly-found in wastewater through a hybrid biological and adsorption process. J Environ Manage. 2020;263:110368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Application of an indigenous microorganisms-based fixed-bed GAC-biofilm reactor for passive and sustainable treatment of oil sands process water through combined adsorption and biodegradation processes. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pap S, Kirk C, Bremner B, et al. Low-cost chitosan-calcite adsorbent development for potential phosphate removal and recovery from wastewater effluent. Water Res. 2020;173:115573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TAH, Ngo HH, Guo WS, et al. Modification of agricultural waste/by-products for enhanced phosphate removal and recovery: potential and obstacles. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:750–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Zhang S, Wang Y, et al. Synchronous removal of ammonium and phosphate from swine wastewater by two agricultural waste based adsorbents: performance and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol. 2020;307:123231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojiri A, Ohashi A, Ozaki N, et al. Pollutants removal from synthetic wastewater by the combined electrochemical, adsorption and sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;161:137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski R, Paul A, Lewandowski M. Improving SBR performance alongside with cost reduction through optimizing biological processes and dissolved oxygen concentration trajectory. Appl Sci. 2019;9:2268.
   Google Scholar
• Jagaba AH, Kutty SRM, Lawal IM, et al. Sequencing batch reactor technology for landfill leachate treatment: A state-of-the-art review. J Environ Manage. 2021;282:111946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calero R, Iglesias-Iglesias R, Kennes C, et al. Organic loading rate effect on the acidogenesis of cheese whey: a comparison between UASB and SBR reactors. Environ Technol. 2017;39:3046–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conidi D, Parker WJ, Smith S. Effect of solids residence time on dynamic responses in chemical P removal. Water Environ Res. 2019;91:250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu R, Wu M, Yang J. Effect of sludge retention time and phosphorus to carbon ratio on biological phosphorus removal in HS-SBR process. Environ Technol; 201(34):429–435.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Montgomery: design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Willy Sons; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Priyanka K, Behera M, Neelancherry R. Graywater treatment in sequencing batch reactor using simultaneous nitrification,: denitrification, and phosphorus removal, with kinetic studies of phosphate adsorption onto corncob. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact Waste. 2020;24:04020017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA/AWWA/WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd Edition, Washington, DC, APHA and AWWA and WEF. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jurado E, Fernández-Serrano M, Chemosphere JN-O-, et al. Simplified spectrophotometric method using methylene blue for determining anionic surfactants: applications to the study of primary biodegradation in aerobic. Chemosphere. 2006;65:278–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf L, Eddy H, Tchobanoglous G. Wastewater engineering: treatment,: disposal, and reuse. 4th editio. New York [etc.]: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Muhamad MH, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Mohamad AB, et al. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimisation of COD, NH3-N and 2,4-DCP removal from recycled paper wastewater in a pilot-scale granular activated carbon sequencing batch biofilm reactor (GAC-SBBR). J Environ Manage. 2013;121:179–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro TN, de Carvalho KQ, de Lima MX, et al. Influence of HRT and carbon source on the enhancement of nutrient removal in an anaerobic-oxic-anoxic (AOA) system. Environ Technol. 2021: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargi F, Uygur A. Nutrient removal performance of a sequencing batch reactor as a function of the sludge age. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2002;31:842–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Zhang B, Chen Z, et al. Sludge retention time affects the microbial community structure: A large-scale sampling of aeration tanks throughout China. Environ Pollut. 2020;261:114140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Bhowmick GD, Priks H, et al. ANAMMOX-denitrification biomass in microbial fuel cell to enhance the electricity generation and nitrogen removal efficiency. Biodegradation. 2020;31:249–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez D, Pino N, Technology GP-B, et al. Monitoring the removal of nitrogen by applying a nitrification–denitrification process in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:2316–2321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Huang Y, Wang M, et al. Post-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal in an alternating anaerobic/oxic/anoxic (AOA) system treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) domestic. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;339:450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnis-Hayden A, Majed N, Li Y, et al. Impact of solid residence time (SRT) on functionally relevant microbial populations and performance in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems. Water Environ Res. 2020;92:389–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei CH, Wang N, HoppeJones C, et al. Organic micropollutants removal in sequential batch reactor followed by nanofiltration from municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2018;268:648–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ying G, Shareef A, et al. Occurrence and removal of benzotriazoles and ultraviolet filters in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Pollut. 2012;165:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran NH, Urase T, Ngo HH, et al. Insight into metabolic and cometabolic activities of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms in the biodegradation of emerging trace organic contaminants. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:721–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi A, Karimi M, Ebrahimi H, et al. Sequencing batch reactor/nanofiltration hybrid method for water recovery from textile wastewater contained phthalocyanine dye and anionic surfactant. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:103701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinicius Freire Andrade M, Kimiko Sakamoto I, Gomes de Oliveira Paranhos A, et al. Bioremoval of surfactant from laundry wastewater in optimized condition by anoxic reactors. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar