UiO-66-NH₂ nanocomposites incorporated cellulose acetate for forward osmosis membranes of high desalination performance

References

• Zhang P, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, et al. Cross-linking to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with high-flux for dyes and heavy metal ions removal. Chem Eng J 2017;322:657–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinh DX, Tran TPN, Taniike T. Fabrication of new composite membrane filled with UiO-66 nanoparticles and its application to nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol 2017;177:249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, et al. Enhanced permeability of rGO/S-GO layered membranes with tunable inter-structure for effective rejection of salts and dyes. Sep Purif Technol. 2019;220:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomé LC, Mecerreyes D, Freire CSR, et al. Pyrrolidinium-based polymeric ionic liquid materials: new perspectives for CO2 separation membranes. J Membr Sci. 2013;428:260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takht Ravanchi M, Kaghazchi T, Kargari A. Application of membrane separation processes in petrochemical industry: a review. Desalination. 2009;235(1):199–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Van der Bruggen B. The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(7):2335–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirtalebi E, Shirazi MMA, Kargari A, et al. Assessment of atomic force and scanning electron microscopes for characterization of commercial and electrospun nylon membranes for coke removal from wastewater. Desalin Water Treat. 2014;52(34-36):6611–6619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atadashi IM, Aroua MK, Abdul Aziz AR, et al. Membrane biodiesel production and refining technology: A critical review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011;15(9):5051–5062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, He B, Ding J, et al. Preparation and characterization of the organic–inorganic hybrid membrane for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 2010;101(5):1501–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang KY, Chung T-S, et al. Molecular design of the cellulose ester-based forward osmosis membranes for desalination. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66(9):2008–2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Wang Y, Wang X, et al. Desalination characteristics of cellulose acetate FO membrane incorporated with ZIF-8 nanoparticles. Membranes. 2022;12:122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G-R, Xu J-M, Feng H-J, et al. Tailoring structures and performance of polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) desalination membranes via sublayers adjustment – a review. Desalination. 2017;417:19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Shen L, Guan C-Y, et al. Construction of SiO2@MWNTs incorporated PVDF substrate for reducing internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci. 2018;564:328–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan SE, Bar-Zeev E, Elimelech M. Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. J Membr Sci. 2015;493:703–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song N, Gao X, Ma Z, et al. A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination. 2018;437:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabi Z, Moghadassi AR, Hosseini SM, et al. Preparation and characterization of polyvinylchloride based mixed matrix membrane filled with multi walled carbon nano tubes for carbon dioxide separation. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19(1):347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Din LAN, El-Gendi A, Ismail N, et al. Evaluation of cellulose acetate membrane with carbon nanotubes additives. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;26:259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastgar M, Shakeri A, Bozorg A, et al. Impact of nanoparticles surface characteristics on pore structure and performance of forward osmosis membranes. Desalination. 2017;421:179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ba X, Cui N, et al. Preparation, characterisation, and desalination performance study of cellulose acetate membranes with MIL-53(Fe) additive. J Membr Sci. 2019;590:117057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Feng X, Yuan S, et al. Challenges and recent advances in MOF–polymer composite membranes for gas separation. Inorg Chem Front. 2016;3(7):896–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma D, Han G, Peh SB, et al. Water-stable metal–organic framework UiO-66 for performance enhancement of forward osmosis membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56(44):12773–12782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Wang L, Lv Y, et al. Novel polydopamine/metal organic framework thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane for salt rejection and heavy metal removal. Chem Eng J 2020;389:124452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Wu S, Wu Y, et al. High-efficiency adsorption of norfloxacin using octahedral UIO-66-NH2 nanomaterials: dynamics, thermodynamics, and mechanisms. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;518:146226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du W, Bai Y-L, Xu J, et al. Advanced metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their derived electrode materials for supercapacitors. J Power Sources. 2018;402:281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu X, Yue C, et al. Insight into the efficient co-removal of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) by positively charged UiO-66-NH2 decorated ultrafiltration membrane. Chem Eng J. 2021;404:126546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Shi X, Li J, et al. Selective dye adsorption by zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 loaded UiO-66-NH2. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li T, Ba X, Wang X, et al. MIL-53(Fe)@γ-Al2O3 nanocomposites incorporated cellulose acetate for forward osmosis membranes of high desalination performance. Environ Eng Res. 2023;28(1):210448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishnamazi M, Koushkbaghi S, Hosseini SS, et al. Metal organic framework nanoparticles loaded-PVDF/chitosan nanofibrous ultrafiltration membranes for the removal of BSA protein and Cr(VI) ions. J Mol Liq. 2020;317:113934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramezanzadeh M, Tati A, Bahlakeh G, et al. Construction of an epoxy composite coating with exceptional thermo-mechanical properties using Zr-based NH2-UiO-66 metal-organic framework (MOF): experimental and DFT-D theoretical explorations. Chem Eng J. 2021;408:127366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zango ZU, Sambudi NS, Jumbri K, et al. Experimental and molecular docking model studies for the adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onto UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr) metal-organic frameworks. Chem Eng Sci. 2020;220, 115608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherzadeh M, Bayrami A, Amini M. Enhancing forward osmosis (FO) performance of polyethersulfone/polyamide (PES/PA) thin-film composite membrane via the incorporation of GQDs@UiO-66-NH2 particles. J Water Process Eng. 2020;33, 101107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen Y, Zhang J, Xu Q, et al. Pore surface engineering of metal–organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis. Coord Chem Rev 2018;376:248–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghili F, Ghoreyshi AA, Van der Bruggen B, et al. Introducing gel-based UiO-66-NH2 into polyamide matrix for preparation of new super hydrophilic membrane with superior performance in dyeing wastewater treatment. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):105484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DL, Yeung WS, Zhao Q, et al. Thin-film nanocomposite membranes incorporated with UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles for brackish water and seawater desalination. J Membr Sci. 2020;604:118039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young T-H, Chen L-W. Roles of bimolecular interaction and relative diffusion rate in membrane structure control. J Membr Sci. 1993;83(2):153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wang Y, Chen B-Z, et al. Designing high-performance nanofiltration membranes for high-salinity separation of sulfate and chloride in the chlor-alkali process. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019;58(27):12280–12290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Takagi R, Saeki D, et al. Highly improved organic solvent reverse osmosis (OSRO) membrane for organic liquid mixture separation by simple heat treatment. J Membr Sci. 2021;618:118710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Yu Z, Shao L, et al. A novel strategy for enhancing the performance of membranes for dyes separation: embedding PAA@UiO-66-NH2 between graphene oxide sheets. Chem Eng J 2021;403:126281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Yu Z, Shao L, et al. Ag2CO3@UiO-66-NH2 embedding graphene oxide sheets photocatalytic membrane for enhancing the removal performance of Cr(VI) and dyes based on filtration. Desalination. 2020;491:114558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai GS, Lau WJ, Goh PS, et al. Graphene oxide incorporated thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane for enhanced salt removal performance. Desalination. 2016;387:14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, et al. Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci. 2014;453:292–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhetha TA, Moutloali RM. Antifouling properties of Cu(tpa)@GO/PES composite membranes and selective dye rejection. J Membr Sci. 2018;554:195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y-F, Zhang P-B, Sun J, et al. Electrolyte-responsive polyethersulfone membranes with zwitterionic polyethersulfone-based copolymers as additive. J Membr Sci. 2016;510:306–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar