Optimization of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket second-layer influent distribution structure

References

• Austermann-Haun U, Meyer H, Seyfried C, et al. Full scale experiences with anaerobic/aerobic treatment plants in the food and beverage industry. Water Sci Technol. 1999;40(1):305–312. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00399-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettinga G, Field J, van Lier J, et al. Advanced anaerobic waste water treatment in the near future. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(10):5–12. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00222-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massara TM, Komesli OT, Sozudogru O, et al. A mini review of the techno-environmental sustainability of biological processes for the treatment of high organic content industrial wastewater streams. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2017;8(5):1665–1678. doi:10.1007/s12649-017-0022-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski Z, Dyster KN, Nienow AW. The effect of size, location and pumping direction of pitched blade turbine impellers on flow patterns: LDA measurements and CFD predictions. Chem Eng Res Des. 2001;79(8):887–894. doi:10.1205/02638760152721406.
   Google Scholar
• Dabiri S, Hashemi M, Rahimi M, et al. Design of an innovative distributor to improve flow uniformity using cylindrical obstacles in header of a fuel cell. Energy. 2018;152:719–731. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei B, Peng X. Evaluation of parameters monitored in the process of food waste anaerobic digestion. Energy Sources Part A. 2016;38(3):402–409. doi:10.1080/15567036.2013.780114.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang R, Xu J. A CFD-based simulation study of a double-storey sedimentation tank for drinking water treatment. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2020;508(1), doi:10.1088/1755-1315/508/1/012076.
   Google Scholar
• Si B, Li J, Li B, et al. The role of hydraulic retention time on controlling methanogenesis and homoacetogenesis in biohydrogen production using upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and packed bed reactor (PBR). Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:11414–11421. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettinga G. Sustainable integrated biological wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 1996;33(3):85–98. doi:10.1016/0273-1223(96)00303-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury P, Viraraghavan T, Srinivasan A. Biological treatment processes for fish processing wastewater-a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(2):439–449. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germec M, Demirci A, Turhan I. Biofilm reactors for value-added products production: an in-depth review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;27; doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes IB, Meireles A, Goncalves AL, et al. Standardized reactors for the study of medical biofilms: a review of the principles and latest modifications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2018;38(5):657–670. doi:10.1080/07388551.2017.1380601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Chen H, Ji M, et al. Distribution and change of microbial activity in combined UASB and AFB reactors for wastewater treatment. Bioprocess Eng. 2000;22:0315–0322. doi:10.1007/s004490050738.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Xie Q, Rouse JD, et al. Treatment of high-strength corn steep liquor using cultivated polyvinyl alcohol gel beads in an anaerobic fluidized-bed reactor. J Biosci Bioeng 2009;107(1):49–53. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji S, Ma W, Wei Q, et al. Integrated ABR and UASB system for dairy wastewater treatment: engineering design and practice. Sci Total Environ. 2020;749:142267, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues LDS, Pinto ACA, Dutra JDCF, et al. Swine wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled (ARB) and a UASB reactor system. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 2017;38(6), doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n6p3705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Wang D. Influence of external circulation on sludge characteristics during start-up of internal circulation reactor. J Cent South Univ Technol. 2005;12(4):425–429. doi:10.1007/s11771-005-0176-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuan-Foo C, Show-Ying Y, Huey-Song Y, et al. Anaerobic treatment of tetra-methyl ammonium hydroxide (TMAH) containing wastewater. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf. 2008;21(3):486–491. doi:10.1109/tsm.2008.2001227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SY, Huang Q, Chen SB, et al. Engineering example of high concentration printing and dyeing wastewater processed by UBF craft. Adv Mat Res. 2011;255-260:2736–2739. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.2736.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Han B, Cao Y, et al. Impact of substrate concentration on anammox-UBF reactors start-up. Bioresour Technol. 2017;239:422–429. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria CV, Souza DF, Pontes TM, et al. Strategies of anaerobic sludge granulation in an EGSB reactor. J Environ Manage 2019;244:69–76. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Z, Wu J, Rong C, et al. Sludge yield and degradation of suspended solids by a large pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of real municipal wastewater at 25 °C. Sci Total Environ. 2021;759:143526), doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen X, Liu J, et al. Structural characteristics of a spiral symmetry stream anaerobic bioreactor based on CFD. Biochem Eng J 2018;137:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Ding J, Liu XS, et al. The impact of water distribution system on the internal flow field of EGSB by using CFD simulation. Appl Mech Mater. 2014;614:596–604. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.614.596.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch F, Künzler M, Renner M, et al. Liquid distributor design for random packed columns. Chem Eng Res Des. 2019;147:689–698. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyrakos C, Xu C. Soil-structure-water interaction of intake-outlet towers allowed to uplift. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 1997;16(2):151–159. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(96)00034-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, He J, Mu Y, et al. Mathematical modeling of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors: simultaneous accounting for hydrodynamics and bio-dynamics. Chem Eng Sci. 2015;137:677–684. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren TT, Mu Y, Ni BJ, et al. Hydrodynamics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. AIChE J. 2009;55(2):516–528. doi:10.1002/aic.11667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Xiao J, Zhang Y, et al. Gas diffusion through differently structured gas diffusion layers of PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32:4443–4451. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamee PK, Sharma AK. Application of linear programming for looped water supply pipe network design. Water Supply. 2013;13(5):1195–1201. doi:10.2166/ws.2013.126.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Li XX, Huang SK, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of upflow anaerobic reactor feedwater structure. Chem React Eng Tech. 2020;36 (5):395–403. doi:10.11730/j.issn.1001-7631.2020.05.0395.09.
   Google Scholar
• Tay JH, Liu QS, Liu Y. The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57(1-2):227–233. doi:10.1007/s002530100766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B. CFD investigation of turbulence models for mechanical agitation of non-newtonian fluids in anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2082–2094. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonzio G. Biological sabatier reaction with CFD analysis, (2016) doi:10.1063/1.4968767.
   Google Scholar