Effects of art in retail environments

References

• Aiken, N. E. 1998. The Biological Origins of Art. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 2000. “Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes.” European Review of Social Psychology 11 (1): 1–33.10.1080/14792779943000116
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and T. J. Madden. 1986. “Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22 (5): 453–474.10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuizen, N., and S. V. Sgourev. 2014. “Pièces De Résistance? Core and Casual Consumers’ Valuations of Aesthetically Incongruent Artworks.” Psychology & Marketing 31 (8): 604–614.10.1002/mar.2014.31.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argo, J. J., D. W. Dahl, and A. C. Morales. 2006. “Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others.” Journal of Marketing 70 (2): 81–94.10.1509/jmkg.70.2.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., M. Chen, and L. Burrows. 1996. “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (2): 230–244.10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., and J. Rossel. 2004. “Art and Prices. Reputation as a Mechanism for Reducing Uncertainty in the Art Market.” Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 56 (1): 32–50.10.1007/s11577-004-0002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Bettman, J. R. 1970. “Information Processing Models of Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 7 (3): 370–376.10.2307/3150297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P. H., F. F. Brunel, and T. J. Arnold. 2003. “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (4): 551–565.10.1086/346250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, T. T., and R. E. Petty. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Consumer Research 11: 674–675.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. 1980. “Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5): 752–766.10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupchik, G. C. 1992. “From Perception to Production: A Multilevel Analysis of the Aesthetic Process.” In Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process, edited by G. C. Cupchik and J. Laszlo, 83–99. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cupchik, G. C., and R. Gebotys. 1988. “The Experience of Time, Pleasure, and Interest during Aesthetic Episodes.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 6 (1): 1–12.10.2190/5YN3-J3P8-FWHY-UDB3
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A., and G. B. Carvalho. 2013. “The Nature of Feelings: Evolutionary and Neurobiological Origins.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14 (2): 143–152.10.1038/nrn3403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, D., and E. Arnould. 2011. “Retail Luxury Strategy: Assembling Charisma through Art and Magic.” Journal of Retailing 87 (4): 502–520.10.1016/j.jretai.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, E. 1982. “Aesthetic Experience and Human Evolution.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41 (2): 145–155.10.2307/430265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, R. J., and J. R. Rossiter. 1982. “Store Atmosphere: An Environmental Psychology Approach.” Journal of Retailing 58 (1): 34–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, R. J., J. R. Rossiter, G. Marcoolyn, and A. Nesdale. 1994. “Store Atmosphere and Purchasing Behavior.” Journal of Retailing 70 (3): 283–294.10.1016/0022-4359(94)90037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. D., H. C. Galton, R. Morgan, D. Evans, C. Oliver, M. Meyer, R. Cusack, et al. 2010. “Listening to Your Heart How Interoception Shapes Emotion Experience and Intuitive Decision Making.” Psychological Science 21 (12): 1835–1844.10.1177/0956797610389191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. 2003. “Authenticity in Art.” In Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by T. Oxford, 258–274. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 2002. The Arts and the Creation of Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, P. S. 1994. “Do We Know What We Need to Know? Objective and Subjective Knowledge Effects on Pro-Ecological Behaviours.” Journal of Business Research 30 (1): 43–52.10.1016/0148-2963(94)90067-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., and C. J. Williams. 1986. “Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of the Attitude–Perception and Attitude–Behavior Relations: An Investigation of the 1984 Presidential Election.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 505–514.10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J., and T. R. Brady. 2004. “Openness to Experience, Non-Conformity, and the Preference for Abstract Art.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 22 (1): 77–89.10.2190/Y7CA-TBY6-V7LR-76GK
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B. 1992. Varieties of Visual Experience. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, L. R., and R. E. Goldsmith. 1999. “A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge.” Journal of Business Research 46 (1): 57–66.10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00057-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J., K. Matzler, K. Hutter, and J. Hautz. 2012. “Consumers’ Creative Talent: Which Characteristics Qualify Consumers for Open Innovation Projects? An Exploration of Asymmetrical Effects.” Creativity and Innovation Management 21 (3): 247–262.10.1111/caim.2012.21.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1976. The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Glasman, L. R., and D. Albarracín. 2006. “Forming Attitudes That Predict Future Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Attitude-Behavior Relation.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (5): 778–822.10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeppel-Klein, A. 2005. “Arousal and Consumer in-Store Behavior.” Brain Research Bulletin 67 (5): 428–437.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., and V. M. Patrick. 2008. “Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products.” Journal of Marketing Research 45 (3): 379–389.10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., and V. M. Patrick. 2011. “Turning Art into Mere Illustration: Concretizing Art Renders Its Influence Context Dependent.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 (12): 1624–1632.10.1177/0146167211415631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., V. M. Patrick, and R. Hagtvedt. 2008. “The Perception and Evaluation of Visual Art.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 26 (2): 197–218.10.2190/EM.26.2.d
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and J. Matthes. 2009. “Computational Procedures for Probing Interactions in OLS and Logistic Regression: SPSS and SAS Implementations.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (3): 924–936.10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P., and P. C. Van Wieringen. 1996. “Beauty in the Eye of Expert and Nonexpert Beholders: A Study in the Appraisal of Art.” The American Journal of Psychology 109 (3): 389–407.10.2307/1423013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P., D. Snelders, and P. C. Wieringen. 2003. “‘Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable’: Typicality and Novelty as Joint Predictors of Aesthetic Preference in Industrial Design.” British Journal of Psychology 94 (1): 111–124.10.1348/000712603762842147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., and M. P. Gardner. 1993. “An Approach to Investigating the Emotional Determinants of Consumption Durations: Why Do People Consume What They Consume for as Long as They Consume It?” Journal of Consumer Psychology 2 (2): 123–142.10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80021-6
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., J. J. Wang, T. S. Chan, J. F. Sherry, and G. Cui. 2014. “M (Art) Worlds: Consumer Perceptions of How Luxury Brand Stores Become Art Institutions.” Journal of Retailing 90 (3): 347–364.10.1016/j.jretai.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltcheva, V. D., and B. A. Weitz. 2006. “When Should a Retailer Create an Exciting Store Environment?” Journal of Marketing 70 (1): 107–118.10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J. N. 2014. “The Artification of Luxury: From Artisans to Artists.” Business Horizons 57 (3): 371–380.10.1016/j.bushor.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., E. Ko, and Y. I. Lee. 2012. “Art Infusion in Fashion Product: The Influence of Visual Art on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention of Consumers.” Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 3 (4): 180–186.10.1080/20932685.2012.10600848
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and D. Augustin. 2004. “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (4): 489–508.10.1348/0007126042369811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. C., W. W. Chen, and C. W. Wang. 2015. “The Role of Visual Art in Enhancing Perceived Prestige of Luxury Brands.” Marketing Letters 26 (4): 593–606.10.1007/s11002-014-9292-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., and R. A. Elkin. 1987. “When Motives Clash: Issue Involvement and Response Involvement as Determinants of Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (2): 269–278.10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M., and B. A. Weitz. 1998. Retailing Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., and T. A. Whitfield. 2004. “Integrating Aesthetics within an Evolutionary and Psychological Framework.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (1): 73–90.10.1080/1463922031000086726
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. P., and P. J. Forrest. 2011. “A Framework for Identifying Factors That Influence Fine Art Valuations from Artist to Consumers.” Marketing Management 21 (1): 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, A. S., and J. Wirtz. 2001. “Congruency of Scent and Music as a Driver of in-Store Evaluations and Behavior.” Journal of Retailing 77 (2): 273–289.10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00042-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. 2007. “Aesthetic Chills as a Universal Marker of Openness to Experience.” Motivation and Emotion 31 (1): 5–11.10.1007/s11031-007-9053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. 1977. “A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Stimulus Screening and Associated Differences in Arousability.” Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 1 (2): 89–103.10.1007/BF01145458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and J. A. Russell. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S., and B. Kahn. 2002. “Cross-Category Effects of Induced Arousal and Pleasure on the Internet Shopping Experience.” Journal of Retailing 78 (1): 31–40.10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00064-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulard, J. G., D. H. Rice, C. P. Garrity, and S. M. Mangus. 2014. “Artist Authenticity: How Artists’ Passion and Commitment Shape Consumers’ Perceptions and Behavioural Intentions Across Genders.” Psychology & Marketing 31 (8): 576–590.10.1002/mar.2014.31.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G. E., and P. Bloom. 2012. “Art and Authenticity: The Importance of Originals in Judgments of Value.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3): 558–569.10.1037/a0026035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G. E., G. Diesendruck, and P. Bloom. 2011. “Celebrity Contagion and the Value of Objects.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (2): 215–228.10.1086/658999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L. 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty?” Journal of Marketing 63: 33–44.10.2307/1252099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, H.. 1986. What Makes an Experience Aesthetic? In Possibility of the Aesthetic Experience. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., J. T. Cacioppo, C. F. Kao, and R. Rodrigues. 1986. “Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (5): 1032–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., C. P. Haugtvedt, and S. M. Smith. 1995. “Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior.” Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences 4: 93–130.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J., and J. H. Gilmore. 1998. “Welcome to the Experience Economy.” Harvard Business Review 76: 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40 (3): 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., and W. Hirstein. 1999. “The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6/7): 15–51.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, D., and B. Bastian. 2002. “Painting Preference and Personality, with Particular Reference to Gray’s Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Approach Systems.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 20 (2): 177–193.10.2190/73UQ-50QU-UATW-RY5E
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., P. Winkielman, and N. Schwarz. 1998. “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments.” Psychological Science 9 (1): 45–48.10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, D. T., and R. Fazio. 1977. “On the Consistency between Attitudes and Behavior: Look to the Method of Attitude Formation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (1): 28–45.10.1016/0022-1031(77)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, T. 2006. “Color Preferences of High and Low Sensation Seekers.” Creativity Research Journal 18 (2): 229–235.10.1207/s15326934crj1802_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., K. A. Mccarthy, and E. Svenson. 1994. “Judgments of the Creativity of Artwork from Students and Professional Artists.” The Journal of Psychology 128 (1): 23–31.10.1080/00223980.1994.9712708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., and A. Mehrabian. 1976. “Environmental Variables in Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 3 (1): 62–63.10.1086/jcr.1976.3.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. B., and R. A. Spreng. 1996. “A Proposed Model of External Consumer Information Search.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (3): 246–256.10.1177/0092070396243005
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., J. P., McLaughlin, and P. Leighten. 1989. “Novice Strategies for Understanding Paintings.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 3 (1): 65–72.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfeld, S., and A. Reinstaller. 2007. “The Effects of Gallery and Artist Reputation on Prices in the Primary Market for Art.” Journal of Cultural Economics 31 (2): 143–153.10.1007/s10824-007-9031-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. E. 2005. “The Artist and the Brand.” European Journal of Marketing 39 (11/12): 1291–1305.10.1108/03090560510623262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, E., A. Mathur, and R. B. Smith. 1997. “Store Environment and Consumer Purchase Behavior: Mediating Role of Consumer Emotions.” Psychology and Marketing 14 (4): 361–378.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. 2005. “Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 23 (2): 119–133.10.2190/12AV-AH2P-MCEH-289E
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., K. Fayn, E. C. Nusbaum, and R. E. Beaty. 2015. “Openness to Experience and Awe in Response to Nature and Music: Personality and Profound Aesthetic Experiences.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9 (4): 376–384.10.1037/aca0000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinyard, W. R. 1993. “The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions.” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (2): 271–280.10.1086/jcr.1993.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley, L. W., and R. E. Milliman. 2000. “Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behaviour: A Review of the Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Business Research 49 (2): 193–211.10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven, L., and L. Ashworth. 2007. “Looking Forward, Looking Back: Anticipation is More Evocative than Retrospection.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (2): 289–300.10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., S. A. Brown, L. M. Maruping, and H. Bala. 2008. “Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation.” MIS Quarterly 32 (3): 483–502.10.2307/25148853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, V. A. 2013. “Stimuli–Organism-Response Framework: A Meta-Analytic Review in the Store Environment.” Journal of Business Research 66 (9): 1420–1426.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. C., J. Baker, J. A. Wagner, and K. Wakefield. 2007. “Can a Retail Web Site Be Social?” Journal of Marketing 71 (3): 143–157.10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R., and F. D. Davis. 1984. “Self-Understanding and the Accuracy of Behavioral Expectations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10 (1): 111–118.10.1177/0146167284101013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, T. A. 2005. “Aesthetics as Pre-Linguistic Knowledge: A Psychological Perspective.” Design Issues 21 (1): 3–17.10.1162/0747936053103002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, A. S., and G. C. Cupchik. 1992. “The Evaluation of High Art and Popular Art by Naive and Experienced Viewers.” Visual Arts Research 18 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., and J. E. Bateson. 1999. “Consumer Satisfaction with Services: Integrating the Environment Perspective in Services Marketing into the Traditional Disconfirmation Paradigm.” Journal of Business Research 44 (1): 55–66.10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00178-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., and M. C. Lee. 2003. “An Examination of the Quality and Context-Specific Applicability of Commonly Used Customer Satisfaction Measures.” Journal of Service Research 5 (4): 345–355.10.1177/1094670503005004006
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., A. S. Mattila, and R. L. Tan. 2000. “The Moderating Role of Target-Arousal on the Impact of Affect on Satisfaction – An Examination in the Context of Service Experiences.” Journal of Retailing 76 (3): 347–365.10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00031-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., T. Ringberg, H. Mao, and L. A. Peracchio. 2011. “The Construal (in)Compatibility Effect: The Moderating Role of a Creative Mind-Set.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (4): 681–696.10.1086/660118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel, D. W., M. Nadal, A. Flexas, and E. Munar. 2013. “An Evolutionary Approach to Art and Aesthetic Experience.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7 (1): 100–109.10.1037/a0028797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar