Comparison of trunk impairment scale versions 1.0 and 2.0 in people with multiple sclerosis: A validation study

References

• Andresen EM 2000 Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81: S15–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D 1989 Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 41: 304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen J, Gibbons L, Gianas A, Kraft GH 2001 Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test. Multiple Sclerosis 7: 201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron MH, Lord S 2010 Postural control in multiple sclerosis: Implications for fall prevention. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 10: 407–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron MH, Nilsagard YE 2013 Measurement and treatment of imbalance and fall risk in multiple sclerosis using the international classification of functioning, disability, health model. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 24: 337–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Repetti S 2007 Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 29: 1920–1925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo D, Regola A, Meotti M 2006 Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 28: 789–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng EM, Hays RD, Myers LW, Ellison GW, Beckstrand M,Vickrey BG 2001 Factors related to agreement between self-reported and conventional Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Multiple Sclerosis 7: 405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte E, Morales A, Pou M, Aguirrezabal A, Aguilar JJ, Escalada F 2009 Trunk control test: Early predictor of gait balance and capacity at 6 months of the stroke. Neurologia 24: 297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Gear M, Pauli A, Cowan P, Finnigan C, Hunter H, Mobberley C, Nock A, Sims R, Thain J 2010 The effect of core stability training on balance and mobility in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: A multi-centre series of single case studies. Multiple Sclerosis 16: 1377–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels D, Dalgas U, Romberg A, de Groot V, Bethoux F, Vaney C, Gebara B, Medina CS, Maamagi H, Rasova K, de Noordhout BM, Knuts K, Feys P 2012 Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Multiple Sclerosis 18: 364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn H, Creanor S, Haas B, Marsden J, Freeman J 2014 Frequency, characteristics, and consequences of falls in multiple sclerosis: Findings from a cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 538–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ 2003 Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: The 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology 60: 31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS 1987 The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation 1: 6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtzke JF 1983 Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33: 1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C 2005 Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 1618–1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzetta D, Cattaneo D, Pellegatta D, Cardini R 2004 Trunk control in unstable sitting posture during functional activities in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85: 279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth YC, Paul L, McFadyen AK, Mattison P, Miller L 2012 Reliability and clinical significance of mobility and balance assessments in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 35: 69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likhi, M, Jidesh, VV, Kanagaraj, R, George, JK 2013 Does trunk, arm, or leg control correlate best with overall function in stroke subjects? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 20: 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Martin CL, Phillips BA, Kilpatrick TJ, Butzkueven H, Tubridy N, McDonald E, Galea MP 2006 Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Multiple Sclerosis 12: 620–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Bamer AM, Johnson SL, Amtmann D, Kraft GH 2011 Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM&R 3: 624–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuigan C, Hutchinson M 2004 Confirming the validity and responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). Neurology 62: 2103–2105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbaek AG, Jensen E, Sorensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U 2012 Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 34: 2251–2258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS 2010 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: Reliability and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, Denison E, Gunnarsson LG, Bostrom K 2009 Factors perceived as being related to accidental falls by persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 31: 1301–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, Gunn H, Freeman J, Hoang P, Lord S, Mazumder R, Cameron M 2015 Falls in people with MS–An individual data meta-analysis from studies from Australia, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. Multiple Sclerosis 21: 92–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsagård Y, Gunnarsson L, Denison E 2007 Self-perceived limitations of gait in persons with multiple sclerosis. Advances in Physiotherapy 9: 136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, Lundholm C, Denison E, Gunnarsson LG 2009 Predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study. Clinical Rehabilitation 23: 259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, Lundholm C, Gunnarsson LG, Denison E 2007 Clinical relevance using timed walk tests and ‘timed up and go’ testing in persons with multiple sclerosis. Physiotherapy Research International 12: 105–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, von Koch LK, Nilsson M, Forsberg AS 2014 Balance exercise program reduced falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A single-group, pretest-posttest trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 2428–2434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsagard Y, Westerdahl E, Wittrin A, Gunnarsson M 2016 Walking distance as a predictor of falls in people with multiple sclerosis. Physiotherapy Research International 21: 102–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson EW, Cho CC, Finlayson ML 2007 Fear of falling and associated activity curtailment among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 13: 1168–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S 1991 The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 39: 142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringel I, Zettl UK 2006 Estimates of the walking distance in multiple sclerosis patients and their effect on the EDSS. Journal of Neurology 253: 666–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyuer F, Mirza M, Erkorkmaz U 2006 Balance performance in three forms of multiple sclerosis. Neurological Research 28: 555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet R, Hoang P, Lord S, Gandevia S, Delbaere K 2013 Falls efficacy scale-international: A cross-sectional validation in people with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 94: 883–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Kersten P 2010 Investigating the internal validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) using Rasch analysis: the TIS 2.0. Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 2127–2137.
   Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H, Thijs V, Vaes K, De Weerdt W 2005 Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: A comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disability and Rehabilitation 27: 1023–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W 2004 The Trunk Impairment Scale: A new tool to measure motor impairm ent of the trunk after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 18: 326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nuyens G, Nieuwboer A, Van Asch P, Ketelaer P, De Weerdt W 2006 Reliability and validity of trunk assessment for people with multiple sclerosis. Physical Therapy 86: 66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Willems AM, Ooms L, Nieuwboer A 2007 Validity of the trunk impairment scale as a measure of trunk performance in people with Parkinson’s disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88: 1304–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT 1992 Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C 2005 Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age and Ageing 34: 614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar